Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Were walkmans allowed during the 1980's?

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Were walkmans allowed during the 1980's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Aug 2013, 18:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: .
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Were walkmans allowed during the 1980's?

During take off and landing? Or were they required to be switched off? Just out of curiosity. I was wondering if all this hysteria about electronic devices on planes started with mobile phones or whether it's always been like that.

Likewise the first laptops predated genuinely portable mobiles. Were they banned also?

Last edited by t1grm; 26th Aug 2013 at 18:27.
t1grm is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 19:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
t1grm,

Try google ? Yields a number of results that include.....

Since the 1980s, airlines have prohibited passengers from using any electronic devices while planes are in flight (and as they depart and land)
mixture is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 19:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All which hysteria? I haven't looked at the daily mail recently. Was another spoiled brat unfairly treated for not following the instructions of the crew?
ExXB is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 21:04
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: .
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try google ? Yields a number of results that include.....
Yes lets google everything and not discuss anything on here. Makes for a really lively and vibrant internet forum - not.
t1grm is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 21:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: .
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All which hysteria? I haven't looked at the daily mail recently. Was another spoiled brat unfairly treated for not following the instructions of the crew?
Neither have I (daily mail that is) although the tone of your response would suggest you are a regular reader (spoilt brat etc).

I suppose I was referring to the fact that it is discussed more frequently now since the massive increase in smart phone usage. Before smartphones there wasn't much you could do on a mobile whilst on a plane.

P.S. Lot of angst on this forum it seems...
t1grm is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 22:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In order to avoid being referred to as a spoilt brat (though I am sure many who read the DM are neither spoilt or brats) for the record I neither buy or read that newspaper.

To respond to the OP's enquiry - NO! There were no constraints on the use of walkmans or similar devices which generally reproduced music from tape. Such machines had no capability to emit signals which might interfere with aircraft systems, radio, navaids etc. as do "modern" devices (hence the "hysteria")

And in case the OP doubts my sources - I am well qualified to know having used both long and shorthaul since the early '60s, before such devices were either available or fashionable. (My first long-haul was in 1951, London Singapore return, when in flight announcements were barely audible over the din of P&W/Wright or RR Merlin power so they would have been inaudible anyway.)

I suspect if we had taken the entertainment of the day - a wind up gramophone - on board a Constellation in 1951 there might have been quite a party half way to Rome with dancing.............
rgsaero is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 22:18
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: .
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info. No reason to doubt your sources. Why would I?

That does beg the question why we can't use "modern" devices in flight mode if walkmans etc were OK (during take off and landing that is). Also the advice seems to extend to non transmitting devices nowadays such as mp3 players, digital cameras and ebook readers.

P.S. I wasn't accusing DM readers of being spoilt brats. I was implying that turn of phrase was typical of the sensationalist terminology used in the DM.

Last edited by t1grm; 26th Aug 2013 at 22:20.
t1grm is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 23:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: home @ 103E
Age: 59
Posts: 81
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps rsdio operators, navigators & flight engineers were more immune to EMF interference than the magic boxes underneath the floorboards...?
perantau is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2013, 23:35
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: .
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite possibly!
t1grm is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 04:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brazil
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unlike the old analog devices which worked only in the audio band, the digital ones have a 'clock' of several megahertz. In a badly shielded device there's a possibility of the harmonics of this clock radiating into the antenna cabling and interfering with navigation and communication. Cellphones and wi-fi and bluetooth enabled devices have their own transmitters which may create even stronger interference.
belfrybat is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 05:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall one Ms. Tina Turner, during the Private Dancer Tour circa 84/85, boarding a Twotter at PLH bound for LHR and being asked to removed her Walkman during the safety brief/demo but I do believe she was allowed to use it during flight.
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 06:13
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
really lively and vibrant internet forum
I think you've come to the wrong place, try the next forum down on the left.
mixture is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 07:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t1grm
Thanks for the info. No reason to doubt your sources. Why would I?

That does beg the question why we can't use "modern" devices in flight mode if walkmans etc were OK (during take off and landing that is). Also the advice seems to extend to non transmitting devices nowadays such as mp3 players, digital cameras and ebook readers.

P.S. I wasn't accusing DM readers of being spoilt brats. I was implying that turn of phrase was typical of the sensationalist terminology used in the DM.
Well this spoiled brat says that if you don't like google, why not try searching this forum. Lots to learn on this subject here.
ExXB is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 07:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Presumably the Twotter crew wanted Tina Turner to hear what was said in the safety briefing?
rgsaero is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 07:24
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: have I forgotten or am I lost?
Age: 71
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also the advice seems to extend to non transmitting devices nowadays
you'd be surprised at what transmits.

a friend of mine used to tune a particular frequency on an AM radio and borrow my Hewlett Packard HP35. (HP's first calculator.) He would punch in a particular series of numbers and the radio would pick the keystrokes up and play a music box tonal piece. quite well done actually.
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 08:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 383
Received 18 Likes on 6 Posts
I suspect the answer was that after you had spent your money on a Walkman, you wouldn't have been able to afford a holiday which involved flying.

My first one was circa 1980 as a student (Sanyo model) and I didn't go on a passenger jet until 1986.
GrahamO is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 08:15
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 65
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That does beg the question why we can't use "modern" devices in flight mode if walkmans etc were OK (during take off and landing that is). Also the advice seems to extend to non transmitting devices nowadays such as mp3 players, digital cameras and ebook readers.
...And so the Hamster Wheel continues to rotate: There is nothing, repeat nothing in the modern world quite so intolerable as having to switch stuff off for 15 minutes.: Starvation, Global Water Shortage, Chemical Weapons are issues that apparently pale into insignificance next to the requirement to switch off an iPod.

FWIW, there was no initial problem with walkmans, however the arrival of the CD playing variety (supposedly non-transmitting) led to a noticeable surge in reported incidents. I have been involved in one such incident myself and quite literally seen the effects.

It is also worth mentioning that
non transmitting devices nowadays such as mp3 players, digital cameras and ebook readers
are in fact, usually, transmitting devices (if network ready).

The FAQ and Search functions are your friends.
TightSlot is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 09:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tamworth, UK / Nairobi, Kenya
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has (had) nothing to do with whether the individual item transmits or receives, or if that item could or could not impact the flight instruments in any way.

It was because if any device could, then all devices had to be "banned" because it would be impossible for the flight crew to know which devices, models, versions, operating systems, etc., do and do not affect flight instruments.

So, once it was discovered that there was such a thing as a device which affected flight instruments, they all had to be banned. Years later, the ban is slowly being lifted as everyone realizes that today's equipment is different and does not interfere with flight instruments on today's airliners.
darkroomsource is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 12:52
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brazil
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the CD playing variety (supposedly non-transmitting)
Because they're digital. Just like with the calculator above, the clock is a square wave, very rich in harmonics (multiples of the clock frequency). Some of those may interfere with sensitive equipment.
belfrybat is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2013, 15:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,684
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 23 Posts
My understanding has always been that EMF interference was secondary to the takeoff/landing procedure, this was to stop pax becoming totally immersed (as they seem to do even when walking along/across the street) in their beloved walkman, not listening to the safety briefing, and not being able to respond to or even hear sudden commands if an event happens during takeoff/landing.

In the same vein are those pax who talk loudly and/or hold up large broadsheet newspapers during the safety briefing.

I do often wonder how those who walk out across the street absorbed in their Walkman would cope with handling a light aircraft circuit single-handed, doing all the aspects of handling a turbulent approach, and keeping a lookout for other traffic, while keeping attention on hissy-scratchy static ATC for anything that might affect them, and getting their calls in on cue.
WHBM is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.