Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Thomson Dreamliner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 22:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thomson Dreamliner

So there's been plenty of adverts for this new "dreamliner" which seemingly claim that everyone gets more legroom. How would the standard legroom on this aircraft compare to any other? What is so unique about this new aircraft?
RTN11 is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 23:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Boeing 787 Dreamliner - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2012, 19:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I am aware, passengers in the main economy cabins are getting between 34 and 36 inch pitch depending exactly where they are seated.

A lot more than most other carriers economy seats.

And "Dreamliner" is Boeing's name for the aircraft not something Thomson has made up

Last edited by TFlyguy; 23rd Sep 2012 at 19:23.
TFlyguy is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2012, 00:45
  #4 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Boeing have worked assiduously on promoting this name. They have branded it by this name long before it got the first two components stuck together. Which makes sense. They had to differentiate it and make sure that it was not given a name by anyone else.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2012, 09:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Subject to the maximum number of seats, approved by the FAA and other regulatory bodies, airlines can cram as many or as few seats as they deem appropriate.

The original B747-100 had about 435 seats while other variants (such as the Japanese Short Range) had over 550. Same basic fuselage size, different markets.

Thompson has a website on what they are proposing. I'm not sure if 'Economy Club' is economy or something better but they say: "Travel in Economy Club and you’ll get a 33” or 34” seat pitch – that’s more legroom in economy than BA, Virgin Atlantic, bmi and Monarch."
ExXB is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2012, 15:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Economy Club is some idiot in marketing's brainwave - it means economy.
TFlyguy is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2012, 16:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Got to say, the product looks stunning.
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2012, 19:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: W
Age: 42
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the Thomson blurb economy seat pitch is 33-34" compared to current 33" on their 767 long haul. Premium Economy is put at 38" compared to 36" on current 767. Given the 767 Thomson long haul product is fantastic assuming the dreamliner meets what is advertised it will be superb.
PhilW1981 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2012, 16:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks nice. I love this piece from the website:

Powerful engines: When it comes to powerful engines, the Dreamliner’s take some beating. Each one has enough power to supply energy to two million iPods at the same time.
That's reassuring. Fantastic piece of meaningless comparison (50 football pitches, a hundred double-decker buses, twice the size of Wales, etc).
LondonPax is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2012, 21:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 382
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Yes, its even less impressive when you realise it is 10-15% less powerful than the Trent 800 engine fitted to the A380.

I think its rating of 3.8 cats per square ironing board says so much more
GrahamO is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2012, 16:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Trent 900 not 800 on the A388?
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2012, 12:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, that one's 4.3 cats (or 3 million iPods in new money).
LondonPax is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.