Empty bottle through security?
Thread Starter
Empty bottle through security?
I am travelling hand luggage only from Manchester next week. I wish to take one of those metal sport bottles in an insulated sleeve to my destination. It will be empty and dry.
What chances of getting it through security or does anyone know who I can ring for advice?
Thanks
What chances of getting it through security or does anyone know who I can ring for advice?
Thanks
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny you should ask this. I accidentally left mine (1 litre aluminium) in my handbaggage two weeks ago when travelling from EDI. I took it out and asked the security chap if it was OK, explaining that I'd forgotten it but it was empty. He said as long as it's empty it's fine. He didn't check, just put it through and all was well.
I was very surprised as I thought that no containers were allowed, empty or full, and I expected to be barked at and told to throw it in the bin.
I was very surprised as I thought that no containers were allowed, empty or full, and I expected to be barked at and told to throw it in the bin.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably not a recommended method but this guy got everything through.
Norwegian tourist falls asleep on airport baggage belt - Telegraph
Norwegian tourist falls asleep on airport baggage belt - Telegraph
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Over here in the land run by the TSA Gestapo, all kinds of people take empty bottles/containers through, and fill them from the water fountain beyond security.
Not everyone wants to pay $5 for a bottle of water that probably came out of a sewage line anyway.
Not everyone wants to pay $5 for a bottle of water that probably came out of a sewage line anyway.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Cologne
Age: 34
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt it would be a problem, I think 9 times out of 10 though it depends who you get at MAN.
I worked there as a psa for 4 years and in that time it was hit and miss with who bothered with plastic bags/liquids etc. I even got a bottle of drink through once - full.
It was late at night and I was staff but still 
And lets not forget a young boy got through
I think as long as you mention it first there shouldn't be a big to do about it.
I worked there as a psa for 4 years and in that time it was hit and miss with who bothered with plastic bags/liquids etc. I even got a bottle of drink through once - full.
It was late at night and I was staff but still And lets not forget a young boy got through
I think as long as you mention it first there shouldn't be a big to do about it.
obgraham - while I understand your dislike for the TSA and am aware that it has its rogue agents and impinges on some civil liberties, most of the people working for the TSA are fundamentally decent ordinary people.
The TSA doesn't arrest people in their homes at night. People do not just disappear. The TSA as far as I'm aware does not run secret jails where people are routinely tortured at length in the most painful ways possible. The TSA does not shoot people dead on whim.
Could you maybe modify the way you describe the TSA, so as to recognise the difference with 1930s/1940s Germany ?
The TSA doesn't arrest people in their homes at night. People do not just disappear. The TSA as far as I'm aware does not run secret jails where people are routinely tortured at length in the most painful ways possible. The TSA does not shoot people dead on whim.
Could you maybe modify the way you describe the TSA, so as to recognise the difference with 1930s/1940s Germany ?
Last edited by davidjohnson6; 10th Aug 2012 at 23:54.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
reasonable balance
The TSA do not raid your home.
However they do often over exert thier position, as a result of a power complex.
I will leave it to you to decide where the balance is.
However they do often over exert thier position, as a result of a power complex.
I will leave it to you to decide where the balance is.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Comparisons with Nazis are always puerile, rarely shedding light on anything more than the nature of the person making the comparison.
You'll never stop it, so just ignore it.
You'll never stop it, so just ignore it.
While on a trip to Germany, I realized that empty bottles are just an other harmless item on the carry on and several trips later, security staff at various airports seem to agree with me.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,073
Received 2,942 Likes
on
1,253 Posts
Knowing UK Plc, they will want you to pour the air out lol.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could you maybe modify the way you describe the TSA
Sorry you don't like my comparison.
I do accept that it might have been better posted in JetBlast.
Last edited by obgraham; 12th Aug 2012 at 16:42.
What I do is to put the cap in my pocket. If challenged it is then arguably a drinking container like a cup - not a bottle. Put the top in another bag or your coat pocket.
Plastic bottles rarely get picked up by x-ray, the only time I can remember is at ATL but the TSA agent was happy enough when I said that it was empty. I suspect that a metal one might.
One of my personal dislikes is airports that do not have drinking fountains airside. US airports are good in this respect, the larger hubs are OK, leisure airports can be awful - I think that they see selling bottled water as a revenue stream. You can also use water from taps (doubtless hygenic but I generally carry water purification tablets in any case) but when they are mixer taps - ugh!
My other pet hate is secondary security which specifically prevents you taking water on board. Security yes, but if you can't trust primary security whats its point?
Plastic bottles rarely get picked up by x-ray, the only time I can remember is at ATL but the TSA agent was happy enough when I said that it was empty. I suspect that a metal one might.
One of my personal dislikes is airports that do not have drinking fountains airside. US airports are good in this respect, the larger hubs are OK, leisure airports can be awful - I think that they see selling bottled water as a revenue stream. You can also use water from taps (doubtless hygenic but I generally carry water purification tablets in any case) but when they are mixer taps - ugh!
My other pet hate is secondary security which specifically prevents you taking water on board. Security yes, but if you can't trust primary security whats its point?
Last edited by Peter47; 12th Aug 2012 at 19:54.
Doubt if an empty bottle would be a problem but as already said some of these security folks seem to make the rules up as they go along.
Had an incident recently at Birmingham where I missed my flight due entirely to the security taking so long to empty my carry on item by item for a recheck. When I asked them if they wouldn't mind going a bit faster it appeared to slow the process even more. When my name was paged to get to the gate during this I asked the security would they mind calling the gate and letting them know where I was and I got the standard reply that they had a job to do, I said I appreciate that but maybe you could do it a bit quicker. When I had missed my flight I asked the security supervisor if I could get a note/letter for my company to say why I had extra costs due to missing the flight and I was told that they can't do that but did I want to lodge a complaint, I thought that it was bit confrontational to say the least.
And before all the comments start I was checked in 90 minutes before the departure time for a domestic flight.
One thing that has occurred to me is with all this focus on bottles of liquids whats to stop somebody from having a false bottom/battery pack in the likes of a laptop and having liquids in that.
Had an incident recently at Birmingham where I missed my flight due entirely to the security taking so long to empty my carry on item by item for a recheck. When I asked them if they wouldn't mind going a bit faster it appeared to slow the process even more. When my name was paged to get to the gate during this I asked the security would they mind calling the gate and letting them know where I was and I got the standard reply that they had a job to do, I said I appreciate that but maybe you could do it a bit quicker. When I had missed my flight I asked the security supervisor if I could get a note/letter for my company to say why I had extra costs due to missing the flight and I was told that they can't do that but did I want to lodge a complaint, I thought that it was bit confrontational to say the least.
And before all the comments start I was checked in 90 minutes before the departure time for a domestic flight.
One thing that has occurred to me is with all this focus on bottles of liquids whats to stop somebody from having a false bottom/battery pack in the likes of a laptop and having liquids in that.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And then there's the check that's done on all bottles taken airside for sale to the public.
I have observed the channel that the pallets go through, at a number of airports. A quick glance at a full pallet, evidently to check that the packaging is undisturbed, and "OK, mate".
Noting that hi-jacks in the early 1970's (one example of many; VC10 at DXB) were in some cases planned 12-18 months in advance and used staff infiltrated into airside jobs over a longer period, the complacency of the security authorities who believe that it cannot happen again, while they persist in the absurd security theatre in the passenger, staff and crew channels, beggars belief.
Do they really believe that terrorist planners are incapable of co-ordinating a packer in the supplier's premises, a security guard, and an airside employee, to put explosives and/or weapons into the hands of a suicidal "clean skin" terrorist buying stuff in WH Smith? Perhaps all from the same ethnic background, in the UK at least.
I suspect, on the available evidence, that they do indeed believe that.
I think about this every time I watch some bored, officious, super-sensitive security person bullying a hard-of-hearing granny who did not realise she had to remove all her outer garments, metallic items, shoes etc to walk through a scanner and be patted down by a short-tempered wardress before being allowed airside, to prove that she's not carrying in her handbag or about her person the wherewithal to take control of a large civil aircraft.
I have observed the channel that the pallets go through, at a number of airports. A quick glance at a full pallet, evidently to check that the packaging is undisturbed, and "OK, mate".
Noting that hi-jacks in the early 1970's (one example of many; VC10 at DXB) were in some cases planned 12-18 months in advance and used staff infiltrated into airside jobs over a longer period, the complacency of the security authorities who believe that it cannot happen again, while they persist in the absurd security theatre in the passenger, staff and crew channels, beggars belief.
Do they really believe that terrorist planners are incapable of co-ordinating a packer in the supplier's premises, a security guard, and an airside employee, to put explosives and/or weapons into the hands of a suicidal "clean skin" terrorist buying stuff in WH Smith? Perhaps all from the same ethnic background, in the UK at least.
I suspect, on the available evidence, that they do indeed believe that.
I think about this every time I watch some bored, officious, super-sensitive security person bullying a hard-of-hearing granny who did not realise she had to remove all her outer garments, metallic items, shoes etc to walk through a scanner and be patted down by a short-tempered wardress before being allowed airside, to prove that she's not carrying in her handbag or about her person the wherewithal to take control of a large civil aircraft.
Last edited by Capot; 13th Aug 2012 at 09:40.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think about this every time I watch some bored, officious, super-sensitive security person bullying a hard-of-hearing granny
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And then there's the check that's done on all bottles taken airside for sale to the public.
I have observed the channel that the pallets go through, at a number of airports. A quick glance at a full pallet, evidently to check that the packaging is undisturbed, and "OK, mate".
Noting that hi-jacks in the early 1970's (one example of many; VC10 at DXB) were in some cases planned 12-18 months in advance and used staff infiltrated into airside jobs over a longer period, the complacency of the security authorities who believe that it cannot happen again, while they persist in the absurd security theatre in the passenger, staff and crew channels, beggars belief.
Do they really believe that terrorist planners are incapable of co-ordinating a packer in the supplier's premises, a security guard, and an airside employee, to put explosives and/or weapons into the hands of a suicidal "clean skin" terrorist buying stuff in WH Smith? Perhaps all from the same ethnic background, in the UK at least.
I suspect, on the available evidence, that they do indeed believe that.
I think about this every time I watch some bored, officious, super-sensitive security person bullying a hard-of-hearing granny who did not realise she had to remove all her outer garments, metallic items, shoes etc to walk through a scanner and be patted down by a short-tempered wardress before being allowed airside, to prove that she's not carrying in her handbag or about her person the wherewithal to take control of a large civil aircraft.
I have observed the channel that the pallets go through, at a number of airports. A quick glance at a full pallet, evidently to check that the packaging is undisturbed, and "OK, mate".
Noting that hi-jacks in the early 1970's (one example of many; VC10 at DXB) were in some cases planned 12-18 months in advance and used staff infiltrated into airside jobs over a longer period, the complacency of the security authorities who believe that it cannot happen again, while they persist in the absurd security theatre in the passenger, staff and crew channels, beggars belief.
Do they really believe that terrorist planners are incapable of co-ordinating a packer in the supplier's premises, a security guard, and an airside employee, to put explosives and/or weapons into the hands of a suicidal "clean skin" terrorist buying stuff in WH Smith? Perhaps all from the same ethnic background, in the UK at least.
I suspect, on the available evidence, that they do indeed believe that.
I think about this every time I watch some bored, officious, super-sensitive security person bullying a hard-of-hearing granny who did not realise she had to remove all her outer garments, metallic items, shoes etc to walk through a scanner and be patted down by a short-tempered wardress before being allowed airside, to prove that she's not carrying in her handbag or about her person the wherewithal to take control of a large civil aircraft.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
... or snatching a small bottle of cool drink with a few drops left in the bottom from the clutches of a two year old child who doesn't even understand English.
Thread Starter
Pleased to say that my empty aluminium bottle sailed through MAN security without any eyebrows being raised.
However both 12yo son and I were subjected to the whole body scanner.
However both 12yo son and I were subjected to the whole body scanner.
At least the TSA, for all their faults, unlike the DEA, don't lock people in a room for 5 days having forgotten them. No food, no water, no lavatory, and the guy had to be taken to hospital with kidney damage. Plus the guy didn't have any drugs - he was in car with people who did.
I hope he gets the $20 million he's suing for.
I hope he gets the $20 million he's suing for.