Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

A380.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th January 2012 | 16:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia.
A380.

A very large aircraft. Should we worry about wing cracks?
Avitor is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2012 | 17:09
  #2 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,842
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
Yes!

Any aircraft that has a crack ANYWHERE, needs checking. Why do you ask? Hopefully, not a doubtful YouTube video.
PAXboy is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2012 | 17:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: The Isle Dordt
Considering the current "no hull loss" and "no cracked wing" status of the A380, I think Airbus and the authorities have a point when they say that those cracks are not serious.
MathFox is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2012 | 13:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: On Earth
Although it is not really potentially serious in the short-term, it might have a devastating effect in the long-term. Sometimes I feel like the QF31 incident occurred to make us aware of such wing cracks before it gets too serious and leads to a hull-loss.
The Aviation Herald report makes it clear what the Airworthiness Directive thinks about it, I think you should read that.
EmadIV is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2012 | 14:23
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 2
From: Europe
The term "Wing Cracks" is incorrect, as it implies a far more dangerous condition than it really is. It evokes a picture of cracks all over the wing, with bits falling off.

See Tech Log for some facts.

The Times today described the cracks as being in the roots of certain brackets where they are attached to the wing structure, internally, and while unrectified these cracks could eventually affect the wing integrity, they do not at the moment.

And that seems to me to be about right, judging from what the experts in Tech Log say, although you need to sort them from the BS merchants. But I am not an expert in composite structures.

Problem is, so few of us are, including most of the LAME community.
Capot is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2012 | 14:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: On Earth
I have to agree with Capot.
EmadIV is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd January 2012 | 03:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: earth
The term "Wing Cracks" is incorrect, as it implies a far more dangerous condition than it really is. It evokes a picture of cracks all over the wing, with bits falling off.

See Tech Log for some facts.

The Times today described the cracks as being in the roots of certain brackets where they are attached to the wing structure, internally, and while unrectified these cracks could eventually affect the wing integrity, they do not at the moment.

And that seems to me to be about right, judging from what the experts in Tech Log say, although you need to sort them from the BS merchants. But I am not an expert in composite structures.

Problem is, so few of us are, including most of the LAME community.
Ok we have a wing that initially failed it's loading test, now we have statements that these fixtures are composite and were installed for production purposes being less than secondary structure... Sounds like Airbus installed these fixtures as a light weight resolution to pass the wing load test and they are now the weak link. They have been found as a result of fuel leaks and catastrophic engine failure driving someone to inspect the wing. Aluminum is a bit heavier but it bends before it breaks as is the opposite with composite structure. Now we have a CAA mandate to inspect this aircraft.

The problem now is what do you do to prevent these fixtures from breaking W/O adding weight to the aircraft and maintain the wing loading expectations of the CAA.

Granted much of what I have said is based upon 2nd hand information and speculation based on my readings of the progression of this aircraft from design to operation. The wings are not likely to fall off... YET. Here is an interesting link to insight on the massive wing flex this aircraft endures (composite material does not flex well).


grounded27 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.