Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

APD and Government aviation policy

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

APD and Government aviation policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Nov 2011, 19:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Driffield
Age: 73
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
APD and Government aviation policy

I have written to my MP Greg Knight, to get him to explain the Governments current aviation policy. Which to me consists of no airport expansions until 20 whenever. An increase in Air Passenger duty, which so outraged Willie Walsh in Michael O'Leary they appeared on the same news clip together! Germany are about to complete a new runway in Frankfurt and a completely new airport in Berlin. The UK seems to have a complete luddite outlook, I presume to garnish votes from the green lobby. All the jobs in aviation in the UK this attitude will cost doesn't bear thinking about. Looks like in the future we will have to move abroad to keep out jobs. I will let you know wht his reply is. Some fob off no doubt.
stephenkeane is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 01:30
  #2 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
stephenkeane Welcome aboard our luxury cabin.

It will be great to learn what reply you get not least if we discover that they do HAVE an aviation policy. Many people who are involved with, or interested in UK aviation, do not believe that any such policy exists.

Currently, they have two policies which are applied to everything and anything:
  1. Try not to upset the people who vote for us or might vote for us and that means don't upset ANY newspaper.
  2. Get as much money as possible - from any source at any time.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 08:21
  #3 (permalink)  

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The South of France ... Not
Age: 74
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I attended a high level aviation event in September, which was addressed by Philip Hammond, then Secretary of State for Transport (subsequently promoted, of course).

So – his words not mine – HMG do not have an aviation policy. They are developing a ‘draft strategy document’ for release early in the New Year, with a final text due in 2013. So until then they will just carry on making it up as they go along.
The SSK is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 10:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lemonia. Best Greek in the world
Posts: 1,759
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
No Government has had an Aviation policy for many years. Not since they sold off BAA et al.
Alistair Darling tried, but ripped up what he had written as soon as he got to the Treasury. (Who remembers runway 2 at Stansted, a poss runway 2 at lgw,and runway 3 at lhr??)
The main reason is that the DfT is seen by ambitious Civil servants as a career graveyard. The CS know that a move to the DfT is the end of their careers. The only place with a worse collection of CS is the Min of Ag., or whatever they call it now.
If a fast track civil servant gets anywhere near the DfT, they quickly come off the track - or leave, sharpish.

Ditto with Ministers. they are only at the DfT to either launch themselves in to a better job, or into political oblivion.

Until this changes, forget any notion of a National Aviation strategy.
Ancient Observer is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 14:22
  #5 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Thanks The SSK, VERY interesting. Of course, a final text in 2013 and an election possible in 2014 and certainly by 2015 = no action can be taken in that timescale. Another smart political move.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 17:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 152 Likes on 95 Posts
I beleive that govt policy is very much centered on high speed rail within UK and even in Europe so aviation is not that high on the agenda, as well as having variouse issues with Green agenda attached to it (APD good for tax raising though if you are politician). As our political masters all work out of London the Channel tunnel makes this quite logical for them and those who live in the SE. However for the rest of the country high speed rail is just not an option for the forseable future, and even when built journey times via SE England will still be longer than flying.
Do we not all remember when the tunnel was being sold to us how we were going to get Night Sleepers from the North of England / Scotland to Europe (Rolling stock now in Canada I beleive) and how we will commute Manchester to Paris via the Channel Tunnel for example. British govt,s have never had a joined up transport policy as they take too long to put together for politicians who just love to tinker, and do not return quick enough profits for UK banks so little intrest there either.

Small rant over time for G&T !
Mr Mac is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.