Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

BA/Quantas Linkup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th October 2011 | 21:03
  #1 (permalink)  
77
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 125
Likes: 3
From: Europe
BA/Qantas Linkup

In view of the current Qantas problems and possible future problems is it a wise move for BA to give routes eg BKK-SYD to QANTAS.

Last edited by 77; 31st October 2011 at 16:20. Reason: typo
77 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2011 | 06:29
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 9
From: BHX LXR ASW
BA/QANTAS linkup

After an independent tribunal ordered a permanent end to the industrial dispute with its union members, then I don't see a problem.

Passengers voting with their feet, well that's a different story altogether.
crewmeal is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2011 | 08:23
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,726
Likes: 103
From: The Winchester
After an independent tribunal ordered a permanent end to the industrial dispute with its union members
Not so sure it's that permanent, I think the parties have a time limit in which to reach agreement over the current dispute, otherwise a solution will be imposed.

I think the OP's question is a good one. Worse case - do BA want to be putting their codeshare passengers on a third party "outsourced" Longhaul service in the Far East?

IMHO the lawyers will have the codeshare agreement all sewn up and in this day and age the passengers won't care if they think they're getting a good deal.
wiggy is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2011 | 12:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 13
From: UK
Given the Industrial Relations problems BA have had in recent years you could ask whether QF should have given more thought to whether they wanted to put their passengers on to BA. I accept that QF do still fly to London so they are able to carry their own pax all the way but that's not what actually happens all the time.

Maybe they deserve one another?

PS Qantas not Quantas!
Hartington is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2011 | 21:42
  #5 (permalink)  
77
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 125
Likes: 3
From: Europe
Given that Qantas seem to have a declining popularity (see reports on other threads) it would seem to me that BA would be better off keeping the routes into Oz rather than pax avoid BA in order to avoid Qantas.
Re BA industrial relations I would guess that with the intoduction of New Fleet the extreme views of som CC may well be tempered.
77 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2011 | 06:27
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 9
From: BHX LXR ASW
It seems that both sides have had industrial relations problems. BA and the cabin crew, (which is still 'ongoing' judging by the negative comments elsewhere in this forum) now QF with their current problems with ground staff.

I doubt whether anything will change in the near future unless QF are suddenly sold off, then BA would have to look into codesharing on the kangaroo routes all over again.

In 2 years time SQ will probably have their low cost brand up and running, which take competition and yields to a new level.
crewmeal is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.