Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Qantas grounds entire worldwide fleet

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Qantas grounds entire worldwide fleet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Oct 2011, 10:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas grounds entire worldwide fleet

Posted FYI - in case any of you are booked and/or affected

Qantas grounds entire worldwide fleet | Business | guardian.co.uk
TightSlot is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2011, 12:41
  #2 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
... and so Qantas move into a new era that denotes them 'progressing' to the category of carriers that are now elderly and endangered. Why do I say that? Because the are trying to play hard-ball with people who have long standing grievances and, critically, contracts.

They are walking the same road as allt he European and American legacy carriers and look as if they are going to make the same mistakes. To be fair both sides have genuine points, of course, but neither side wants to lose and neither side seems to want to find a negotiated middle line. Ergo, they will all lose. Very sad but they will be in illustrious company as they slide down the scale to obscurity over the next decade.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2011, 18:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 77
Posts: 1,267
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
Am I correct in assuming that all pax flying to/from Eu destinations will have to be hotelled and victualled at Qantas expense? Plus Eu compensation?
radeng is online now  
Old 30th Oct 2011, 13:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Harrow England
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As QF is not an EU based airline the rules will not apply on return flights back to Europe and seats on other airlines are hard to find. For EU based passengers it appears they are telling customers to stay at home, contact a travel agent and re book. I don't think anyone should make any assumptions at the moment, if they are not flying again in a few days, they may never do so.
san diego is online now  
Old 30th Oct 2011, 15:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 2,866
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Whilst there may well be real reasons to play hardball, the very idea of such brinksmanship in these interesting times is, IMHO, just a bit short of mad. The competition, especially the Middle-Eastern giants will just capitalise on this event and hoover up the passengers, especially those wanting to travel over the xmas/ny period who won't want to risk disruptions. Image or the perception of it is everything and to take an internal issue external and affect your customers......never a good idea.
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2011, 16:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From working in Australia some years ago I was not overly impressed by the power, and abuse of it, by the unions. At times it was just a total pi**take. If playing hardball at the risk of temporarily (IMHO) paralysing the airline brings the power crazy unions to their senses, then go for it Mr. Joyce.

In the end it can only benefit the pax.
Shack37 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2011, 16:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 77
Posts: 1,267
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
sandiego

I thought the rules applied to airlines flying to the EU, as well as from it.
radeng is online now  
Old 30th Oct 2011, 18:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Where its at
Age: 40
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sandiego

I thought the rules applied to airlines flying to the EU, as well as from it.
They do, but they only apply to flights which actually land at an EU airport. They do not necessarily apply to itineraries which have an EU airport as a final destination. This has the potential to catch people out if they have connections or layovers en route (as all ''Kangaroo' itineraries do).

For example, if a passenger has booked to fly Sydney-London via Singapore, they have no rights under EU Regulation 261 if the flight is canceled or delayed before they board the plane in Sydney. The first leg of the journey (SYD-SIN) is not covered by the regulations because it takes place completely outside the EU (despite the fact that (1) the itinerary ends at an EU destination and (2) you have missed your connection as a result of industrial action by the airline). If flights were grounded while the passenger was in Singapore then they would be able to enforce their rights under the Regulations as the destination of the specific flight in question is within the EU.

Unfortunately, I know this through bitter experience...

Last edited by Anansis; 30th Oct 2011 at 18:29.
Anansis is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2011, 20:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see Quantas doing damage that will take years to recover from, if they resume operations. Foolish move unless their intent is to cease operations sell assets and restart paying slave wages as a new operator.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2011, 20:35
  #10 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
An independent tribunal in Australia has ordered a permanent end to the industrial dispute that has grounded all Qantas flights.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 11:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 68
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Joyce has got roundly criticised for "madness" but in one move he got the Australian gumment (Julia Gillard et al) acting exclusively on his behalf on his dispute and ordering his employees back to work on pain of criminal sanctions. Hard-ball, for sure, but "mad" I would wonder, actually.

Yes, his precipitate action may have pi**ed off passengers, but wasn't the piecemeal action doing that anyway?
HKPAX is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 12:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, his precipitate action may have pi**ed off passengers, but wasn't the piecemeal action doing that anyway?
I totally agree, his 100% grounding for a short period will cause less pax pain than a series of rolling strikes disrupting services over a much longer period and affecting a greater number of passengers.
Shack37 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 18:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE]I totally agree, his 100% grounding for a short period will cause less pax pain than a series of rolling strikes disrupting services over a much longer period and affecting a greater number of passengers. [QUOTE]


I see the complete opposite, rolling disrubtions will be seen as a union action most people place the blame on the employees. 100% shows a company willing to screw all their customers to throw a tantrum and make a point. Next time you buy a ticket and the fares are similar who would you choose. Australians used to fly Quantass out of patriotism in many cases, Quantass just lost that.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 19:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Australians used to fly Quantass out of patriotism in many cases, Quantass just lost that.
I doubt that ... and it's QANTAS
TSR2 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 23:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see the complete opposite, rolling disrubtions will be seen as a union action most people place the blame on the employees. 100% shows a company willing to screw all their customers to throw a tantrum and make a point. Next time you buy a ticket and the fares are similar who would you choose. Australians used to fly Quantass out of patriotism in many cases, Quantass just lost that.
I think it shows a company with spheroids to take on the unions. The fleet was grounded for about a day and affected (if what I read is accurate) some 70,000 people. A string of rolling strikes, especially if called without advanced warning would probably affect a similar number of pax each time. Pat on the back for Mr. Joyce, "good onya mate"
Shack37 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2011, 01:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt that ... and it's QANTAS
It will be soon refered to as WAS Qantass.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2011, 07:55
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or was qantas
ejectx3 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.