Lost Luggage
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Age: 44
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lost Luggage
A simple question which I hope can be answered here;
Is it really possible for a flight of a major UK airline to take off from a major UK airport with over 100 cases missing and the airline to then be able to claim they never knew anything was wrong?
Is it really possible for a flight of a major UK airline to take off from a major UK airport with over 100 cases missing and the airline to then be able to claim they never knew anything was wrong?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Short answer : Yes.
If you had asked : Should it be possible, rather than is it possible, then the answer would be no.
There are many reasons why suitcases may be left behind, but for the airline to say they were unaware that anything was wrong is inexcusable.
If you had asked : Should it be possible, rather than is it possible, then the answer would be no.
There are many reasons why suitcases may be left behind, but for the airline to say they were unaware that anything was wrong is inexcusable.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Generally for most airlines, the loadsheet for the capt is produced based on the computerised system (unless of course you're doing a manual loadsheet). If there was lets say 300 bags checked in, the loadsheet would say 300. The dispatcher / load controller would have to tell the captain about these missing pieces of luggage as it'd require a new loadsheet.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Age: 44
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely with close on a third of the luggage missing the airline is duty bound to inform the passengers of the situation.
No one wants to go on holiday without their luggage.
No one wants to go on holiday without their luggage.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And delay the flight?? And the return and possibly the one after... sometimes you have to upset the minority to ensure the majority are happy... plus in most cases the bags are with you in 24hrs anyway and there is this cool thing called travel insurance if there is something you desperately need in the bag.
Last edited by londoneasyjetboi; 7th Oct 2011 at 05:03. Reason: Atrocious English.
N4790P
plus in most cases the bags are with you in 24hrs anyway and there is this cool thing called travel insurance if there is something you desperately need in the bag.
If it is deemed necessary to leave 100 bags behind it is possible that the reason was due to a weight restriction preventing them from being carried.
It is easier to reduce the weight by offloading bags than to try to offload fewer bags and their owners, with all the arguments that would follow and the costs of re-booking accommodation etc etc. Re booking passengers onto other flights can be very difficult especially if the following flights are fully booked, whereas getting 100 bags away within 24 hours is easier and cheaper.
However there should be no way that the pilot or airline rep is unaware of a reduced payload as the pilot will have had to have changes made to their loadsheet, and the ground agents loading staff sign a form stating the bags loaded and where they are loaded on the aircraft.
The down route station should be aware that passengers will be arriving without their bags, but depending on the flight time they might not have all the details of whose bags etc before the flight gets there.
It is easier to reduce the weight by offloading bags than to try to offload fewer bags and their owners, with all the arguments that would follow and the costs of re-booking accommodation etc etc. Re booking passengers onto other flights can be very difficult especially if the following flights are fully booked, whereas getting 100 bags away within 24 hours is easier and cheaper.
However there should be no way that the pilot or airline rep is unaware of a reduced payload as the pilot will have had to have changes made to their loadsheet, and the ground agents loading staff sign a form stating the bags loaded and where they are loaded on the aircraft.
The down route station should be aware that passengers will be arriving without their bags, but depending on the flight time they might not have all the details of whose bags etc before the flight gets there.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MAN
Age: 55
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lost luggage
and there is this cool thing called travel insurance if there is something you desperately need in the bag.
Tell me you wrote this in Jest...
With the posters name I'm not sure!
Nope, travel insurance is there to cover unforseen events, it's not
an insurance copanies job to pay for a carriers incompetence.
Tell me you wrote this in Jest...
With the posters name I'm not sure!
Nope, travel insurance is there to cover unforseen events, it's not
an insurance copanies job to pay for a carriers incompetence.
Last edited by Jetdriver; 7th Oct 2011 at 12:05.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Geneva
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The down route station should be aware that passengers will be arriving without their bags, but depending on the flight time they might not have all the details of whose bags etc before the flight gets there.
Well, if the computer knew that all along, why didn't someone tell me earlier??? Why can't the handling agent intercept the baggage-less at the door of the aircraft, and hand them the paperwork already prepared, along with whatever vouchers or compensation might be applicable?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Age: 44
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope, travel insurance is there to cover unforseen events, it's not
an insurance copanies job to pay for a carriers incompetence.
an insurance copanies job to pay for a carriers incompetence.
The pilot just didn't want anything to make him miss his slot with all the knock on ramifications and expense to the airline that would cause.
For the airline to then turn around and say nothing to do with us, go claim off your travel insurance seems a very dodgy practice indeed.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your flight was an international flight, or any flight in the EU the provisions of the Montreal Convention 1999 (MC99) apply. While compensation, in the sense of automatic payment for your inconvenience, doesn't apply, the airline is liable for proven damages up to a fixed maximum.
I would send a claim setting out your losses and ask them to pay. There is no "extraordinary circumstances" defense under MC99. You may be asked for original receipts for your claims, and this would be reasonable for any expenses you incurred.
Good luck
I would send a claim setting out your losses and ask them to pay. There is no "extraordinary circumstances" defense under MC99. You may be asked for original receipts for your claims, and this would be reasonable for any expenses you incurred.
Good luck
I'll probably get shot down in flames here but it's not a great idea to tell passengers if theres a lot of bags being left behind. The crew would get endless grief for however long the flight is when ultimately they're there for safety and wouldn't be able to do anything about it. There would always be someone ready to start a mutiny and go OTT which is not good in an aircraft scenario. It would also impede on service delivery......whether that be BOB or complimentary. Chances are most would travel without their luggage anyway so inform them on arrival.
Baggage shouldn't be left in an ideal world but there are obviously occasions where it is necassary. Earlier this Summer LGW had baggage belt issues and for my airline if they waited for the bags that were missing the schedule would have ben a right off. Despite all the understandable issues surrounding left bags, most pax would rather the schedule keep on track.
However, an airline should always know where large amounts of left bags are.
Baggage shouldn't be left in an ideal world but there are obviously occasions where it is necassary. Earlier this Summer LGW had baggage belt issues and for my airline if they waited for the bags that were missing the schedule would have ben a right off. Despite all the understandable issues surrounding left bags, most pax would rather the schedule keep on track.
However, an airline should always know where large amounts of left bags are.
DC8 freighter to the rescue the next day 
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Age: 44
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chances are most would travel without their luggage anyway so inform them on arrival.
A carrier like Easyjet will not even compensate you a single penny in the first 24 hours for lost luggage. So if you want a dip in the hotel pool that'll be in your bra & knickers because Stelios won't be paying for a new cossie.
Let's not forget that because of security people have to put their medicines in the hold baggage. Two people on my flight had to scramble around to find replacements for vital medication.
It's not as if hold luggage is a perk any more, it's £30 a case!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you read squeezies "carrier regulations" you will see that it is "their policy" to cover costs of a maximum of £25 per day after the first 24 hours.
Of course this policy does not overrule MC99 which makes them liable for a maximum of SDR1123 per passenger regardless. (Note that squeezie's website still refers to SDR1000, which is almost two years out of date)
If you have suffered a loss due to lost or delayed luggage then they are liable under MC99, to the maximum amount stated above.
Proving a loss may be difficult but most courts would consider the circumstances. A cossie for eight Glasweigians would probably be considered reasonable, in the circumstances mentioned.
Also, medicines are exempt from the 100ml security rule. Any amount, within reason, can be taken on board in hand luggage. Never put medicines or valuables in hold luggage - ever!
Of course this policy does not overrule MC99 which makes them liable for a maximum of SDR1123 per passenger regardless. (Note that squeezie's website still refers to SDR1000, which is almost two years out of date)
If you have suffered a loss due to lost or delayed luggage then they are liable under MC99, to the maximum amount stated above.
Proving a loss may be difficult but most courts would consider the circumstances. A cossie for eight Glasweigians would probably be considered reasonable, in the circumstances mentioned.
Also, medicines are exempt from the 100ml security rule. Any amount, within reason, can be taken on board in hand luggage. Never put medicines or valuables in hold luggage - ever!
Er I don't think so, who wants to go on a two week Mediterranean holiday with the kids dressed for the Glasgow rain?
Paxing All Over The World
Also, medicines are exempt from the 100ml security rule.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But I do travel with a copy of my prescription and the insulin is a self enclosed pen, properly labeled (in french) but not in the box it came in.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it really possible for a flight of a major UK airline to take off from a major UK airport with over 100 cases missing and the airline to then be able to claim they never knew anything was wrong?
You can answer these questions probably better than I can.
PM
I remember a flight from Nice to Heathrow some years back: as we pushed back, we could see a load of our bags sitting there........Quite expensive for BA, delivering them all.