CAA Act on Cabin Baggage
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why, therefore, is hold baggage submitted in the normal manner at the check-in desk not verified in this manner, apart from the anodyne "did you pack this yourself has it always been with you"
Secondly, there are a lot of items that you are not specifically questioned about at check-in: The list of such items is theoretically endless.
And thirdly, checked baggage (in the UK at least) is subjected to considerably more checking than the verbal questions at check-in - the primary function of which is an attempt to stimulate the remaining memory brain cells of the genuinely stupid.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm wondering as to how all the laptops made in China and Taiwan make the initial trip to the US. Situation on board a FedEx freighter must be equally bad coz' the Flight Crew cannot access the holds in flight.
Or maybe mint condition batteries are assumed to be less risk?
Or maybe mint condition batteries are assumed to be less risk?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks TightSlot!
A wacky thought; is "a descent, door cracked open and out it goes" a thought that crosses ever your minds?
Another question that crossed my mind is, let's say you had fire and smoke, the natural PAX tendency might be to move away from it. Could PAX get so clustered as to upset the CG; are these things the CC watch for; I was curious.
Also, being inspired by ships: is it an option to have smoke and fire resistant bulkheads that could be used to isolate a fire to a section? Maybe at least for galleys, lavs and such areas?
ross_M - BCF is used because it is extraordinarily effective: It works, and works fast. If you need to cool after smothering, you can follow up with water, assuming no elex are involved.
Another question that crossed my mind is, let's say you had fire and smoke, the natural PAX tendency might be to move away from it. Could PAX get so clustered as to upset the CG; are these things the CC watch for; I was curious.
Also, being inspired by ships: is it an option to have smoke and fire resistant bulkheads that could be used to isolate a fire to a section? Maybe at least for galleys, lavs and such areas?
Last edited by ross_M; 21st Jun 2011 at 09:28.
I'm wondering as to how all the laptops made in China and Taiwan make the initial trip to the US. Situation on board a FedEx freighter must be equally bad coz' the Flight Crew cannot access the holds in flight.
Or maybe mint condition batteries are assumed to be less risk?
Or maybe mint condition batteries are assumed to be less risk?
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is "a descent, door cracked open and out it goes" a thought that crosses ever your minds?
Once the fire is out, the authorities are going to want to examine the evidence, so disposing of it is frowned upon - not least by those living under the flightpath. Finally, depressurising and opening doors is tricky stuff on a large jet. The only aircraft I've known where a procedure for this existed is 747 for smoke clearance: Having read and learned the procedure, it's not something I'm ever in a hurry to do.
C/G and trim - I don't know the answer - we don't watch for it as we're expected to be fighting the fire.
Bulkheads - I assume that they are fireproofed to a degree but they are not hermetically sealed: Smoke, Gas and Fumes will travel throughout the aircraft and usually will kill you long before the heat. One of the things that we need to be careful about in a cabin fire is the use of passenger oxygen systems. The Flight deck on large jet transports does (usually) have an independent oxygen supply.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fail to see how anything in this safety notice, apart from the battery part, is news.
The battery part also can only be called "relatively" new.
In my 20 years as CC this problem has always been present, as it will be until time's end.
All you can hope for is a company that actually backs CC and FC when offloading, asking for PAX to stick to published limits is obviously not realistic.
Mind you, there are of course many Passengers who DO come abord with baggage within limits. Still, there are enough who don't.
The battery part also can only be called "relatively" new.
In my 20 years as CC this problem has always been present, as it will be until time's end.
All you can hope for is a company that actually backs CC and FC when offloading, asking for PAX to stick to published limits is obviously not realistic.
Mind you, there are of course many Passengers who DO come abord with baggage within limits. Still, there are enough who don't.