Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

body scanners and pregnant women

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

body scanners and pregnant women

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Nov 2010, 15:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: the great white north
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
body scanners and pregnant women

hi all,
my wife will be asked to submit to a full body scan in philadelphia tomorrow and she is in her first trimester. is it safe for her? if not, can she refuse and still fly?
thanks in advance
Fun Police is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2010, 16:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Potomac Heights
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding is that she can refuse the full body scan, but will have to accept a full body frisk as the alternative. Otherwise, no fly.
SeenItAll is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2010, 19:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Africa
Posts: 20
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know about the safety but at least you will know if its a boy or girl!
Pandabear is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2010, 19:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockport
Age: 84
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The principle of the scanners is that the radiation does not penetrate flesh, so she should be OK.

As an alternative, if she does not want to be radiated or groped, she could offer to strip off provided she was not touched.
Dairyground is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2010, 21:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US anger at invasive airport security measures - Telegraph


This from the Telegraph
Shack37 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 14:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brussels
Age: 46
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK Health Protection Agency - safe for all

Assessment of comparative ionising radiation doses from the use of rapiscan secure 1000 x-ray backscatter security scanner
shogan1977 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 15:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oil Capital of Central Scotland
Age: 56
Posts: 485
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
As the equivalent dose is orders of magnitude less than she is exposing herself to by flying in the first place............

Let us know how it went.
Donkey497 is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2011, 06:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not safe

These scanner produce ionizing radiation. No body knows how much is too much and unfortunately how little is truly safe. The radiation is of a for considered dangerous to medical imaging workers called back scatter radiation . It delivers it's energy into the cell and may cause damage. It is very dangerous for rapidly dividing cells ie developing fetus .
In my opinion not safe for anyone. Any radiation should be avoided unless medically necessary, and that goes double for pregnant women.
While tissues on the surface will be most at risk 1 photon at the wrong place at the wrong time, and you could have problems.
Your eyes are at risk every exposure to this stuff. They fit the criteria perfectly. Surface tissue and rapidly dividing cells exposed to unregulated doses of ionizing radiation.
biggles49 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.