Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

They are at it again!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th October 2010 | 13:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
BOAC & Right Way Up. Common or garden nous isn't restricted only to 'professional pilots', although some here seem to think otherwise.

How about a small cyber bet. My particular nous tells me the aircraft was not on 'a southern NAT track using the Azores'. If it was, then my point in para one is redundant.
forget is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 13:49
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Inside
What is more likely? The Daily Mail making inquiries as to the actual routing in order to draw an accurate map or The Daily Mail just drawing a map?
One Outsider is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 13:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Outsider. Neither point is relevant. The fact is they diverted to Gander.
forget is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 13:56
  #24 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
...and I'm sure you are right, Forget, but I thought I might just introduce a pause in the attack on the journos, since you don't know.

Since I assume you have no experience of conducting a non-emergency diversion I was merely trying to give you insight into what might happen.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 14:05
  #25 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
In the comments on the article, Ali from KL suggests a "small holding cell" onboard.

I'll do one better: a trap door in said holding cell.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 14:08
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
BOAC, Your assumption is correct; but does this mean I've won the bet.

(I'm surprised no one has produced a Flight Tracker log, or whatever they are called.)
forget is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 14:14
  #27 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 24
From: England
ICAO/the relevant body need to revise the rules. A doctor on board should be allowed to administer a tranquiliser in the interest of safety for all on board. Trouble is you've still got to land ASAP because if anything happened to the f***** he's human rights would be called and both the doctor and airline would be sued.
Superpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 14:17
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: SLF, living somewhere East in the West
Interesting that it only took 3 hours delay. Unless VA has representatives at the airport. I had to divert a BA 777 once (as a physician on board) to Shannon and we were delayed a good 5 hours into LHR (from BOS) as there were no BA agents apparently at Shannon (which seems odd but what do I know). BA was kind enough to put me in business after that so it wasn't that bad for me, they also did a very good job arranging for connecting flights for me.
grimmrad is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 14:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: guess where...
I'm expecting Mr. O'Leary will be making some statements shortly informing that the cabin crew (preferably a different one from the one having the training to replace the copilot) will be allowed to use taser-guns against unruly passengers.

The stunned passenger will then be strapped to his/her seat since a proposal to lock him/her in the toilet was rejected as it would render a future revenue source unusable.

Daermon ATC is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 14:48
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: The frozen north
Talking

A quote from the comments section.
With the rising of fuel and operation cost, it would be suggested, that air carriers operating Jumbo jets, assign a small holding room to jail such a passenger behaving in a dangerosly mannar. rather diverting the plane to landing and departing again.
great suggestion, but why limit its use to passengers though?
CoiledString is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 15:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
With slight modification small holding rooms are already on-board. Toilets, with a small mod to air flow. We know the perp (got it from the Bill) isn't carrying knives or screw-drivers to do any damage so, lock him in, squirt some appropriate non lethal sedative gas through a hole, and on you go. And don't say geting him in there is a problem. First of all he's pissed, and there are always a couple of ex squaddies, or similar, willing to help out.

Diverting a heavy aircraft because of one legless slob is ridiculous.
forget is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 15:30
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Planet Moo Moo
The stunned passenger will then be strapped to his/her seat
Thus incurring a £100 'handling' fee!
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 15:52
  #33 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: Canada
Do not most aircraft carry restraining ties? I know we had them on board our company air craft, and cutters to get them off when needed. I'm sure there had to be enough able bodied volunteers on board to help get the necessary done.
innuendo is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 16:49
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Sunny East Sussex
Lets just imagine that map in the mail is absolutely accurate. The aircraft seems equidistant from most eastern seaboard destinations. What with Gander/St Johns being the closest to the uk, it seems an eminently sensible place to go. Add to that the fact I have no idea of the TAFs for any of them, it hardly seems an unreasonable place to go for an immediate landing.

I've often flown a track similar to that from FL back to the uk. Wind is just as important as track miles over the pond.

With the extra track miles flown, 5 mins to arrest the man, 30 mins to gas up, 45 mins to get some paperwork/brief, and 30 mins faff time, 3 hrs sounds fair to me.
P-T-Gamekeeper is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 17:17
  #35 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 9
From: BHX LXR ASW
For the benefit of Daily Mail editors. Orlando to 'London'.
Nice map, now move the line north to Manchester where the flight was going, and it's even more of a reason to call into Gander
crewmeal is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 18:13
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Paris, France
Sounds like a FAR violation to me, since the crew either served alcohol to the man until he was intoxicated or allowed him to board intoxicated. It seems hypocritical to board drunks and/or make passengers drunk and then complain when they cause a disruption.

And diverting the flight was obviously overreaction. Tie him up, sit him down, and continue the flight.
AnthonyGA is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 19:31
  #37 (permalink)  

Lady Lexxington
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: The Manor House
Of course AnthonyGA, pax have never, ever been known to have their own little stash of booze going on, say bought from duty free and to be quietly getting stuck into it. Easier to point and blame without all the facts.
lexxity is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 19:32
  #38 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: On the western edge of The Moor
Aviation Herald suggests 200NM south of Gander when PAN declared. Landed on runway 03, 35 minutes later
west lakes is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 19:33
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 287
Likes: 7
From: Exit stage right.
Personally I go with the trusting of persons paid to fly the plane and look after the welfare of passengers in making the correct decision in the interests of all of the Passengers onboard. This is notwithstanding the fact that some of same passengers need Lobotomies which as of yet airlines can't provide.

Of course the crew will have considered their own personal safety and welfare as well ........selfish sods but least they landed missing the schools, hospitals and everything else they need to consider to keep Daily Mail readers happy.
racedo is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2010 | 21:56
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Trailer in BC
We ferried this 727 from MIA to Cape Verde with no extra tanks. Didn't divert to Gander though I wanted to.


The 727 that Vanished | History of Flight | Air & Space Magazine
fesmokie is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.