Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Pax and SLF Quote of the Year

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Pax and SLF Quote of the Year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Apr 2010, 15:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Blue Castle
Age: 58
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pax and SLF Quote of the Year

In resopnse to the new charges for Carry On luggage
by Spirit Airlines
"Everyone, and everything, on a plane must pay its own way.
Nobody brings their package to FedEx or U.P.S. and expects them to ship it for free,” said Ben Baldanza, the chief executive of Spirit Airlines
B13Err is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2010, 17:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From their website:

Fees apply for carry-on baggage that will not fit in the under seat space.
Basically, they want to charge for the large heavy stuff that American pax like to take on board as carry-on. Fair enough.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2010, 18:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Age: 60
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nobody brings their package to FedEx or U.P.S. and expects them to ship it for free,” said Ben Baldanza, the chief executive of Spirit Airlines.
Not really a fair analogy, because the passenger has already paid to be transported and it is a long-standing tradition that the air fare includes the transportation of one piece of hand luggage of a certain size (usually 55x45x25 or thereabouts). Bags of this size will fit comfortably into an overhead locker but there is no way they will fit beneath a seat. In effect, this airline is now charging for all carry-on luggage bigger than a handbag - it is clearly nothing more than a revenue-raising exercise, and another nail in the coffin of pleasant economy-class air travel.
Rusland 17 is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2010, 19:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
large heavy stuff that American pax like to take on board
If only that included the large heavy stuff American pax. I'm less than 60kg a believe I should get a discount (or an extra 10-50kg baggage allowance)
ExXB is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2010, 11:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The bar of the Frog and Peach
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In resopnse to the new charges for Carry On luggage

Why me??
Carry0nLuggage is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2010, 12:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Thailand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually if they charged by the kilo it might encourage some of our American friends to lay off the upsized burger meals - what a healthy suggestion!

ChicoG is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2010, 00:06
  #7 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Devil

Carry0nLuggage, you have my deepest sympathies. May I politely suggest a Deed Pole exercise to change your name? After all, the public names in a forum are often known as a 'handle' and it seems that you might need a new one...?
PAXboy is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2010, 12:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: France
Posts: 527
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Deed Pole
.......... or even a deed poll ...................

(and nothing whatever to do with a deceased parrot from Monty Python)
Alsacienne is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 19:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(prepares to be shot down)
When you travel by train or bus/coach on a non-local journey, you take luggage with you for your trip; the same "assumption" has been applied by the airlines over the years. I suspect that a vast majority air of passengers will take luggage with them and therefore expect, that just like the other modes of transport, when they pay their fare it includes a luggage allowance.
What seems to be happening is that rather than an "all-inclusive" fare as major airlines used to charge, the young upstarts are now implementing a "compartmentalisation" approach (probably a marketing guy's idea) whereby a low headline-grabbing price is advertised but by the time you add in the cost of buying the ticket, adding some luggage, pay-to-print boarding passes etc etc, the fare soon costs more than that of a reputable, established carrier. Possibly this is along the lines of, in the UK the "delivery charge" that was for many years a non-optional "extra" when buying a new car.
IMHO an advertised flight price should include all the "essentials" that a majority of passengers expect (ie includes a reasonable luggage allowance, printing of boarding passes, payment fees etc)
HamishMcBush is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 19:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Concept ...

Business pax mainly travel with an overnight bag and a laptop? Mainly in J or F.
Leisure pax travel with loads of holiday luggage? Mainly in Y.

J & F subsidise Y already.

E C O N O M I C S

MPN11 is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2010, 07:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 1,370
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Everyone wants their Airline Ticket to cost less than the Taxi Fare to get them to the Airport. Only way to really do this is to charge for the basic ticket and then have you only pay for what you plan on using. This stops people using the complaint "Why should I pay as much as the guy next to me when i'm only bringing on half the luggage and don't care which seat i'm in?".

People want cheap as tickets, then they start charging for what you use and don't use, downside is that the extra you used to pay went back into the airline allowing for more aircraft to be available and as such delays would be less because if there was a tech problem they could have another aircraft that was free and ready to go in far less time than it would take the fix the current aircraft. If there was a problem with crewing there would be extra crew ready to go because they had that extra money. Lets face it, we get what we pay for!!
Ixixly is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 09:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lewes, UK
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Business pax mainly travel with an overnight bag and a laptop? Mainly in J or F.
Not in my experience. I've very rarely travelled in J or F unless upgraded by the airline, even when working for large, well-heeled companies. And quite frequently I find myself travelling next to someone also on business. Wish it weren't so - but it frequently is.

Doesn't mean I don't travel light though, and there's still a huge time advantage to be had with no bags to pick up on arrival.
liteswap is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 10:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 89
Posts: 31
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
It's my ambition to travel with only my passport tucked into my pocket, not quite made it yet, but working on it, voluminous shirt with 'normous pockets - sold in Camping / Safari Holiday type outfitters called Magellan, 1060 Santa Monica Avenue, CA. topped with one of those photographers sleeveless jerkins with millions of pockets, and completed with cargo pants, also with millions of pockets.

Canvas 'money' belt with plastic buckle that I positively refuse to remove for the Gestapo - no metal, doesn't register, look, I'll prove it - and Crocs that can be kicked off for all the stupid security lines that one is unable to avoid.

I trattle and clank, and look like an " Anorak " - but who cares ? ( actually, I've noticed that my wife tends to get behind in the Duty Free, or Newsagent shops, and boards after me ! )

Still need a backpack - on wheels, with retractable handle, but working on it.
ExSp33db1rd is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 11:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lemonia. Best Greek in the world
Posts: 1,759
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Next time your free pensionner flights get you to the UK, John Lewis had backbacks on wheels with retractable handles.
However, they appear to allow the wheels/handle set up to weigh too much, so I didn't buy one. I'm sure there are lighter weight strong plastics around!
Ancient Observer is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 16:29
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the version before this model from Timberland Speedbird...

Timberland Trekker 18 Wheeled Backpack

its the mutt's nuts. Bought it in T1 LHR
dubh12000 is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 17:31
  #16 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
I found the link irresistible, an 18 wheeler backpack??????? But then found the inches mark had not appeared. I was disappointed. But it looks very good and a good price.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I assume Carry On Luggage is the latest in the film series?

Ooh matron, what have you got in there?
GwynM is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.