The average SLF experience is a miserable one
Guest
Posts: n/a
The average SLF experience is a miserable one
The term Self Loading Freight is an ironic (some might say humorous) one but it also reflects a financial truth that people are cargo and that the more you can pack onto an aircraft the higher will be the carrier's return per air mile. Despite the enormous benefits that the industry has brought to millions of people through efficiencies at every level in the aviation business I was pondering how many more "efficiencies" the average (economy passenger) will be able to withstand before the whole passenger experience becomes intolerable. I was sitting admiring a Sunderland flying boat with a long retired airline captain the other day and he was waxing lyrical about the enormous luxuries enjoyed by the early passengers on the Imperial Airline routes (well before his time). I was quick to point out that these passengers were representatives of the moneyed classes and that modern aviaion has ushered in freedom for the masses. He agreed but asked me if I thought that flying as an "average" passenger" was a tolerable experience. He travels often to France and now always uses the train in preference to scheduled airlines as he finds the French train exeperience more "civilised". What do pilots and passengers think? I was apt to think about this all again after reading this article in The Times.
Cassandra: aeroplane etiquette - Times Online
Cassandra: aeroplane etiquette - Times Online
Last edited by Michael Birbeck; 16th Apr 2009 at 11:05. Reason: Self loading freight not Specified Flight Level
The term Self Loading Freight is an ironic (some might say humorous) one but it also reflects a financial truth that people are cargo and that the more you can pack onto an aircraft the higher will be the carrier's return per air mile...... Sunderland flying boat with a long retired airline captain the other day and he was waxing lyrical about the enormous luxuries enjoyed by the early passengers on the Imperial Airline routes
"The more you pack the higher return". This flies in the face of mainstream airline wisdom that it is the Premium, well spaced-out, nicely catered seats at the front where the money is made. Ask BA. And ask all those high-density seating carrers who have gone out of business.
"Sunderland" and "luxury" in the same sentence ? It had fixed seats, a tinpot galley which couldn't even manage ice for the drinks, vibration beyond adjectives from the four piston engines, no pressurisation so it blew your ears, reliability which led to arrivals at Southampton often days late and an accident record such that you needed to take out supplementary insurance. All for a return fare to Australia of more than the average annual salary.
In "Sunderland" I take it as a reference to the Empire/Sandringham/Solent types. The actual Sunderland was a military RAF aircraft.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sunderland
The Sunderland just prompted the thought of flying boats. I take it you flew on one of the Empire flying boats? 
As one who has moved cargo (not humans) over the years then I can only say, more cargo, more money. If you agree with the statement that passengers are not to be treated as cargo but as human beings then I am with you and the enlightened elements within the industry.
Haven't flown with BA recently. If they are giving passengers more room than I suffered the last time with them then good for them. Was hoping not to make this thread airline specific!
As one who has moved cargo (not humans) over the years then I can only say, more cargo, more money. If you agree with the statement that passengers are not to be treated as cargo but as human beings then I am with you and the enlightened elements within the industry.
Haven't flown with BA recently. If they are giving passengers more room than I suffered the last time with them then good for them. Was hoping not to make this thread airline specific!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The bit from take-off to landing is invariably ok. its what happens either side thats invariably not ok.
My break point used to be 4 hours, less dont fly. Now sadly its gone up to 6.
My break point used to be 4 hours, less dont fly. Now sadly its gone up to 6.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Continental Europe
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the worst part is really just the airport experience. Buying a ticket online is quite easy, and if you print a boarding pass at home, it's not so bad. But if you have to arrive early at the airport, far from the city centre, wait in long queues, be humiliated by security, gate changes, etc, etc...
WHBM has it right. If you want to pay civilized first class fairs, flying can still be rather civil. If you want to get from A to B for the cheapest possible cost, it's bring your own caviar I'm afraid.
WHBM has it right. If you want to pay civilized first class fairs, flying can still be rather civil. If you want to get from A to B for the cheapest possible cost, it's bring your own caviar I'm afraid.
Boardingpass has it about right. Once on you are on board, you get pretty well what you pay for. BA tend to be a bit better than most of the ones I've tried: First class is very good.
But the hassle at the airport is the problem. It would help if the security people at Heathrow had ever heard of the word 'please'.
But the hassle at the airport is the problem. It would help if the security people at Heathrow had ever heard of the word 'please'.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern UK
Age: 55
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually think the experiance is pretty much the same as it was 20 years ago on board (economy), as said by others, its the airport experiance that has got worse, although the introduction of the "print at home" boarding pass has at least cut the check in queue out of the experiance.
I have to say that personally USA airport security is by far the worst bit about the journey now - it is getting to the point where you think about travelling in just a thong (and trust me - I dont look good in a thong!) to avoid the taking off of belts, shoes, coats, etc.
Personally I would be quite happy to walk through one of those "full bodied x ray things" where the operator can see you naked, if it avoided all the security hassles...
I have to say that personally USA airport security is by far the worst bit about the journey now - it is getting to the point where you think about travelling in just a thong (and trust me - I dont look good in a thong!) to avoid the taking off of belts, shoes, coats, etc.
Personally I would be quite happy to walk through one of those "full bodied x ray things" where the operator can see you naked, if it avoided all the security hassles...
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree it is the airport experience which is the worst part of it all. Back in 1978 when I flew on a 747 for the first time it only took 1 hour from getting in the queue to check in to push back. Now one spends forever at everything. In addition to all the airport hassles we know about I find there are too many shops around. I prefer somewhere quiet, just a place to get a cup of coffee and then a seat to look out of a window. Shopping is not what I want. If I can I try to fly from small airports but of course that is often not possible. Where possible now I take to crossing the pond by ship and have virtually given up on flying to Europe, trains and cars are much better. I reserve flying to a necessity eg London to Oz.
Flying itself is still generally speaking a reasonable experience, even in economy. However the advent of touch screens has been a serious down grade in my view. In fact entertainment systems generally I would rather do without and have the underseat leg room back by getting rid of those boxes.
Unfortunately some carriers have also down graded the seat pitch to such an extent I won't use them any more, BA being a very unfortunate example since their service levels are good.
And as for the "old" days, well I bounced all the way from London to Singapore and back in a Bristol Britannia in the early 1960's. I prefer flying today it is fair to say.
Flying itself is still generally speaking a reasonable experience, even in economy. However the advent of touch screens has been a serious down grade in my view. In fact entertainment systems generally I would rather do without and have the underseat leg room back by getting rid of those boxes.
Unfortunately some carriers have also down graded the seat pitch to such an extent I won't use them any more, BA being a very unfortunate example since their service levels are good.
And as for the "old" days, well I bounced all the way from London to Singapore and back in a Bristol Britannia in the early 1960's. I prefer flying today it is fair to say.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And as for the "old" days, well I bounced all the way from London to Singapore and back in a Bristol Britannia in the early 1960's.
The general consensus is right, it's the bits before and after the trip which are a pain in the butt, the on board experience is still (mostly) OK.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coalville
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's the airport experience that hurts, what makes it even worse is the inconsistency with security depending on where you fly from.
For a short trip to, say, Paris give me the train any day.
I don't find much difference between carriers in economy, for example I have recently flown with Iberia and Qantas short haul and they were no better or worse than Easyjet or Virgin Blue, ok for a short hop but pretty terminal for anything over three hours.
I would doubt that the "good old days" could match today's business or first class product in terms of comfort or amenities though, we all look back with rose tinted glasses but honestly a 777 beats a DC-4 anyday!
For a short trip to, say, Paris give me the train any day.
I don't find much difference between carriers in economy, for example I have recently flown with Iberia and Qantas short haul and they were no better or worse than Easyjet or Virgin Blue, ok for a short hop but pretty terminal for anything over three hours.
I would doubt that the "good old days" could match today's business or first class product in terms of comfort or amenities though, we all look back with rose tinted glasses but honestly a 777 beats a DC-4 anyday!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is a difficult one, partly because we can't trust our memories (nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it?).
One thing's for sure, though - ultra longhaul nonstops have made economy class long distance travel a pretty awful experience for a great many people. No wonder Singapore has no economy on its longest flights (correct me if I'm wrong).
On the other hand, I remember BA First Class was no better than the first Club (the cradle seats, remember?) and when forty years ago all passengers had their suitcases opened on entry to the US.
The numbers travelling then were, of course, much lower - even a full VC10 arriving at Boston or Chicago will have delivered fewer than 140 arrivals. Now we have the A380.....
P.S. Getting to many airports has improved. Who remembers the rigmarole of getting the A1 bus from Hounslow West, where the Piccadilly Line used to terminate?!
One thing's for sure, though - ultra longhaul nonstops have made economy class long distance travel a pretty awful experience for a great many people. No wonder Singapore has no economy on its longest flights (correct me if I'm wrong).
On the other hand, I remember BA First Class was no better than the first Club (the cradle seats, remember?) and when forty years ago all passengers had their suitcases opened on entry to the US.
The numbers travelling then were, of course, much lower - even a full VC10 arriving at Boston or Chicago will have delivered fewer than 140 arrivals. Now we have the A380.....
P.S. Getting to many airports has improved. Who remembers the rigmarole of getting the A1 bus from Hounslow West, where the Piccadilly Line used to terminate?!
I think its just miserable.
I dislike it from start to finish and where I can I avoid it like the plague.
The reduction of customer service by the airlines has really done just what you are saying for me.
I fly business between syd-per monthly and it is just suckful. The mealsy s are what i used to get on Ansett years ago in economy, and they dont even serve desert any more.
The fifty minute wait for bags at either end (usually sydney is worse than perth for this) just tops it off, then you have to battle the taxi nazis in sydney
I dislike it from start to finish and where I can I avoid it like the plague.
The reduction of customer service by the airlines has really done just what you are saying for me.
I fly business between syd-per monthly and it is just suckful. The mealsy s are what i used to get on Ansett years ago in economy, and they dont even serve desert any more.
The fifty minute wait for bags at either end (usually sydney is worse than perth for this) just tops it off, then you have to battle the taxi nazis in sydney
Guest
Posts: n/a
My first experience of flying was by far my best experience! In 1957 travelled back from Singapore to UK (my father incidentally was a Flt Eng on Sunderlands at RAF Seletar). Our flight was in an Airwork Hermes (civilian equivalent of the Hastings, I think) we also took off from Paya Lebar and our route was Bankok (refuel) - Calcutta (refuel) - Karachi (nightstop, crew and pax) - Bahrain (refuel) - Beirut (refuel) - Brindisi (nightstop, crew and pax) - Blackbushe! The journey was like a modern day cruise experience, everyone got to know everyone else, the crew seemed like normal human beings,and of course in those days flight deck visits were not only welcomed but were positively encouraged! wonderful for a lad of 10!! You may wonder why coming back from Singapore was my first flying experience, we actually went out by troopship the Empire Fowey, 22 days but thats another story! Yes its true we do tend to remember the "good" times but I've often thought, after years of flying, how nice it would be to relive that journey.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK/Philippines/Italy
Age: 73
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may wonder why coming back from Singapore was my first flying experience, we actually went out by troopship the Empire Fowey,
Came back in '55 in a shiny new Hastings.
Do read the book "Beyond the Blue Horizon" by Alexander Frater, who did a comparable thing, retracing the route in recent times of the old Empire Flying Boats of the 1930s from London to Australia, stopping at all the same points along the way. Probably one of the best books about old-time commercial aviation ever written.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Alexander Frater
"Beyond the Blue Horizon". What an evocative piece of writing.
Was racking my brains or what's left of them. Wasn't there an attempt by a French chap, a couple of years ago, to set up a luxury trans Africa service following the old Imperial Airways route to Durban or Cape Town? I think he intended to use a Catalina (not a Short Empire but still a graceful flying boat from another continent).
I suspect that wars, bureaucracy and good old fashioned economics may have scuppered this idea.
I believe the Empire S.23 was the direct precursor to the military Sunderland. If the stories of the Sunderland's vibration are anything to go by, how bad was the Empire flying boat? Perhaps the well heeled passengers of the day were made of more sturdy stuff than today's voyagers. I suspect the occasional glass of bubbly and the knowledge that one was part of an empire upon which the sun would never set helped
.
I know my mother made a trip across Africa in the 50's in a DC6 and her being most complimentary about the experience despite the appearance of one of the pilots at certain points with a flash light to look at an engine that was disgorging an inappropriate amount of oil. The commercial industry had obviously moved on rapidly from the 30's and 40's.
Was racking my brains or what's left of them. Wasn't there an attempt by a French chap, a couple of years ago, to set up a luxury trans Africa service following the old Imperial Airways route to Durban or Cape Town? I think he intended to use a Catalina (not a Short Empire but still a graceful flying boat from another continent).
I suspect that wars, bureaucracy and good old fashioned economics may have scuppered this idea.
I believe the Empire S.23 was the direct precursor to the military Sunderland. If the stories of the Sunderland's vibration are anything to go by, how bad was the Empire flying boat? Perhaps the well heeled passengers of the day were made of more sturdy stuff than today's voyagers. I suspect the occasional glass of bubbly and the knowledge that one was part of an empire upon which the sun would never set helped
.I know my mother made a trip across Africa in the 50's in a DC6 and her being most complimentary about the experience despite the appearance of one of the pilots at certain points with a flash light to look at an engine that was disgorging an inappropriate amount of oil. The commercial industry had obviously moved on rapidly from the 30's and 40's.
Last edited by Michael Birbeck; 20th Apr 2009 at 19:27.
Guest
Posts: n/a