Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Economy Seating - Would you pay more for legroom?

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Economy Seating - Would you pay more for legroom?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2008, 14:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,223
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I have paid for WT+ on all my recent long haul flights (say the last 4/5 years). In fact I'm paying for Air NZ Business LHR/HKG/AKL/SFO/-LAX/LHR starting any day now. As others have said when I can no longer afford it I probably won't want to undergo long haul however comfortable.

As others have said, a bit of searching can often find you a good deal on such products.

There is another reason for buying WT+ and that is that I've been told that one reason it came into being was that the upgrade between WT and C was becoming too steep. Thus when a premium card waving passenger books WT and waves the card they can be given an upgrade (to WT+) without giving too much away - that can (sometimes) lead to upgrades from WT+ to C.
Hartington is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 04:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: not a million miles from old BKK
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My current airline of choice when traveling BKK to LHR and return is EVA. A late model fleet,fabulous in flight service and really good departure and arrival times in each direction - day flight to London and night flight back.
Currently the difference in fares between Economy and Premium Economy is 13,500 Baht (£214 at normal rates of exchange but currently £270 due to the pounds' weakness). It translates to about a 30% increase over the Economy Class fare.
Needless to say you have to book very early to secure a seat in Premium Economy but at the price it is well worth it.
Xeque is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 12:30
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JNB
Age: 59
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Economy + Great Barrier Reef vs Business

Have just flown Emirates JNB-DXB-BKK-SYD return with my wife and 2 kids. Cattle class. The cost of upgrading just 1 of us to business was more than a 4 day cruise on the Great Barrier Reef in two suites. The reef won hands down.

Travelling as a family we can create much better memories by putting the available funds to use at the destination. Travelling business does not create memories!
MidmarMile is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 12:46
  #24 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,165
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Travelling business does not create memories!
Oh yes it does!!!

You are right, MidmarMile, that for a family it is prohibitively expensive. For a couple, it can be a real positive and boost the holiday. It is all down to money and personal priorities. It is clear for the carriers that money will be the single biggest point for their customers, even without the deep recession.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2009, 22:32
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As much as I would LOVE to fly business class, it's just impossible for us. We make a yearly trip from LHR to BNE, it's a fair old journey, so I would definitely be willing to pay a couple of hundred quid per seat for more comfort/legroom. A 22/23 hour flight is not fun in Y, but I have to say last year we were on Singapore's A380 for the LHR - SIN leg and it was definitely more comfortable that the 747's. Still, 2 or 3 more inches for a £100 would be a no brainer for me.
dreamwatch is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 10:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 851
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts
yes

yes i will pay more

if i can get decent long haul Y seat with a min of 34'' of legroom (which frankly is the MINIMUM that any airline should be offering to its l/h pax)
then thats fine but no way i am sitting 9 hours plus in a seat so vile i want to get off !
how come i have been more comfy in a domestic a320 or smaller jet on an hours' hop then to find myself painfully wedged in a virgin wide-body jet for a 10 hour slog>?
it beggars belief doesnt it>?

if the best l/h airlines had not put in the extra damn seats in the first place but kept the fares abit higher we still would have travelled LOL!!!

believe it or not one of the roomiest leg rooms u can get in cheapo class is with Olympic on their a340's 34'' and wide roomy seat with leg rest,
ok they may snarl at you but its very comfy !
rog747 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 14:16
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone else remember the nine-across seating which at least some 747 operators had in the early-'70s? A bit like the upper deck lounge - didn't last long!
Seat62K is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 15:30
  #28 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,165
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
dreamwatch
Still, 2 or 3 more inches for a £100 would be a no brainer for me.
I suspect the problem is called 'product differentiation' or some such by the kids in marketing.

The problem is that, if they give you that three inches for £150, how do they continue to justify giving someone in the next cabin along an extra nine inches for £1,500?

Obviously I am just picking figures at random but they HAVE to keep the price gap high, in order to keep up the price of the really big seats. If they allow pricing to start sliding backwards, they will be in trouble, especially as they need to raise prices. (On one route I looked at as a possible this year, checking at February and October, the October price was 25% higher and you would expect it to be the other way around.)

I think that the way they are providing the few extra inches for £100/150 is the selling of exit row seats (which has been discussed here a lot). Lastly, American Airlines did a big campaign to throw out rows of seats and expand the leg room. They found it made no difference to sales as the sale is dependent upon the price. They found that people want to pay less and grumble more - and that was two years ago before the Recession.

So I do not see any carrier changing current practice and offering a bit more for a reasonable price.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 16:57
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
32 inch seat pitch to 35 inch is around 13% more in ticket price for economy.

Personally I would have 30 inches in Economy and a superior service in the premium cabins at a price to encourage sales.

Economy is price sensitive, not service or comfort sensitive.
The Real Slim Shady is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 20:41
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Basingstoke
Age: 59
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA kindly upgraded myself and Mrs TN from WT to WT+ DXB-LHR a few weeks ago and I have to say it was a lot better than WT. The quiet was the main thing I noticed as well as the increase in comfort. I would definitely consider WT+ as a paying customer but it all depends on the price difference to economy. The thing is - you don't get there any quicker in the premium cabins - you did with Concorde and that's why people used it.

TN
timmyneedham is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2009, 00:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Podes
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paxboy is correct. The premium charged for Business and First is jealously guarded as it is essential for any profit. Back of the bus barely covers operating cost.
Fruity Tones is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2009, 04:24
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thailand
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Back of the bus barely covers operating cost."

...which is why TG is finding life tough these days. So many of its premium cabin seats are always given away to politicians, bureaucrats, superannuated air force brass and the families of the above, that it doesn't make money at the front, either. Which leaves... Oops!

Is it the only airline in the world which doesn't make money from the premium cabins? One would surmise that there might be the odd African or former Soviet outfit in the same position. What wonderful company we do keep in this country.
rshbkk is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2009, 15:14
  #33 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dreamwatch
We make a yearly trip from LHR to BNE, it's a fair old journey, so I would definitely be willing to pay a couple of hundred quid per seat for more comfort/legroom.
How about premium economy for the long sector between LHR and SIN (or wherever)? If you buy at the right time, that might be only a couple of hundred quid each way.
Globaliser is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.