Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Who pays? 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2008, 12:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who pays? 2

In defence of the poster of the original thread.

Rainboe et al...far fetched or not it DID happen

http://http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/7660302.stm

Mods...A plea...please allow those of us with a command of the english language to contribute before you cut us off
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cheshire
Age: 78
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy maybe a harsh decision . . . . . . ?

please allow those of us with a command of the english language to contribute before you cut us off
I'd like to second that. Looking back at post # 3 of the original thread the only departure from fairly standard english was "u" in place of "you". That's harmless enough, and compared with some of the grammar and spelling regularly seen on these pages, some of which verges on illiteracy, it's really not bad at all.

The story is genuine, and aviation related. A diversion due to a medical emergency, and two disruptive passengers on the same flight !
AMEandPPL is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ireland
Age: 49
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a good job the story is true or Tightslot might have sent the cops round!!!

Last edited by gavin360; 5th Nov 2008 at 16:23.
gavin360 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 15:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a good job the story is true or tightslot might of sent the cops round!!!
It's a good job the story is true or TightSlot might have sent the cops round!!!
Tudor is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 16:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please re-read the first post on the original thread HERE. There is an absence of punctuation and grammar and text-spelling has been used, in addition to the various incorrect spellings. The result is hard to read and comprehend.

I'm not the spelling police, and have no desire to be - however, contributors to this forum are required, as a courtesy to other readers (some of whom may not have English as a first language) to make at least a minimum effort.

Some of you will disagree, or see this as an excellent chance to pass the time mod-bashing: That's fine by me. Before you complain, just consider if you would prefer to visit this forum is a majority of the posts made were to the standard shown in the post linked to above.

gavin360 - thank you for the PM, which further demonstrated the writing technique demonstrated above - Oh, and a little hostility for good measure. I'd suggest that you calm down and have a quiet think for a while.

Now - may we move on please?
TightSlot is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 17:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ireland
Age: 49
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell da truth Tightslot u love it !!!
gavin360 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 17:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the first instance and in the majority of medical diversions the airline pays. A passenger becoming ill does not necessarily result in a diversion. The Captain would make the final decision on the course of action to be taken. This would occur after seeking whatever guidance and advice was available in the circumstances, including professional guidance and advice that may be available after radio communication.

It is not unusual for passengers taken ill on cruise ships to be charged for the costs involved in treating them or removing them to another facility, and although it seldom happens on airliners, there is nothing in practice preventing airlines from seeking recovery of their costs in such circumstances. All travellers are recommended to carry insurance to protect them against the costs incurred in falling ill abroard or in transit, and such insurance should be able to meet the expenses resulting from a decision to divert. In the future I suspect this is likely to happen more and more.

In the case of a diversion due to a passenger causing a disturbance, that would be matter for compensation in the criminal courts, or recovery through the civil courts depending on the circumstances and outcome. Certainly it is covered in the contract of carriage that a passenger would be deemed liable for such costs.
Bealzebub is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.