Couple of questions about BOS-LHR-BOS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern California
Age: 53
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Couple of questions about BOS-LHR-BOS
Hi and thanks.
Was curious about the following:
When flying from BOS to LHR,
Can you tell me what dictates the flight path taken?
For example... when we flew BOS-LHR (Oct 17th) we took a path that led us up and over coming within 350 miles from Iceland at 39,000 feet (AA B777)
On the way home (Oct 25th) we took the same plane straight across at 32,000 feet the whole way until hitting land on the US side...
I was under the impression that higher was more effecient so if time permits could someone comment on what would cause the differences? Both planes were fairly full.
Thanks for any feedback.
Was curious about the following:
When flying from BOS to LHR,
Can you tell me what dictates the flight path taken?
For example... when we flew BOS-LHR (Oct 17th) we took a path that led us up and over coming within 350 miles from Iceland at 39,000 feet (AA B777)
On the way home (Oct 25th) we took the same plane straight across at 32,000 feet the whole way until hitting land on the US side...
I was under the impression that higher was more effecient so if time permits could someone comment on what would cause the differences? Both planes were fairly full.
Thanks for any feedback.
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Terribly sorry, message removed- you didn't get up early enough! Perhaps our friendly moderator here or some of the other 'instant experts' who infest it here have a better answer for you!
Last edited by Rainboe; 27th Oct 2008 at 14:38.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Slough, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi beachfront71,
The route that your aircraft took would have been dictated by the North Atlantic tracks which are generated twice a day by Shanwick and Gander in order to make best use of the strong tailwinds blowing from the US to Europe and also to best avoid them if travelling the other way! Since there is no radar coverage over the huge ocean, aircraft fly along these preset tracks and report positions along the track at set intervals. The controllers can then build up a picture of where all the aircraft are that are crossing the Atlantic.
As for flight levels, the optimum altitude that the aircraft would have flown isn't just concerned with number of passengers but other unseen weights such as extra fuel (the aircraft would most likely be carrying more fuel heading to the US due to the slower groundspeed and therefore longer flightime) and cargo in the hold for example.
Finally, the most likely reason for the fairly low altitude of 32,000ft on a relatively short North Atlantic run would be due to other traffic. Very often, aircraft are forced to fly at lower altitudes than optimum due to conflicting traffic hogging the skies above them!
Regards,
champair79
The route that your aircraft took would have been dictated by the North Atlantic tracks which are generated twice a day by Shanwick and Gander in order to make best use of the strong tailwinds blowing from the US to Europe and also to best avoid them if travelling the other way! Since there is no radar coverage over the huge ocean, aircraft fly along these preset tracks and report positions along the track at set intervals. The controllers can then build up a picture of where all the aircraft are that are crossing the Atlantic.
As for flight levels, the optimum altitude that the aircraft would have flown isn't just concerned with number of passengers but other unseen weights such as extra fuel (the aircraft would most likely be carrying more fuel heading to the US due to the slower groundspeed and therefore longer flightime) and cargo in the hold for example.
Finally, the most likely reason for the fairly low altitude of 32,000ft on a relatively short North Atlantic run would be due to other traffic. Very often, aircraft are forced to fly at lower altitudes than optimum due to conflicting traffic hogging the skies above them!
Regards,
champair79
