What is going on in FRA??
OLD RED DAMASK
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
Age: 70
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is going on in FRA??
Flying Lufthansa a lot recently. Came back from Casablanca the other week on my way to Manchester no problem.
On Monday I turned up for the last flight and the gate number was B32.
Went through passport control and then security. Made my way down to the gate where B31-33 are. Bugger me another security check. That was two in the space of 100meters.
Asked a security person why, got the answer...airport policy. Same question to Lufthansa girl at desk and got an indignant look and was told to shut up and stop questioning airport policy.
Why are we Brits being picked out for this sort of treatment??
On Monday I turned up for the last flight and the gate number was B32.
Went through passport control and then security. Made my way down to the gate where B31-33 are. Bugger me another security check. That was two in the space of 100meters.
Asked a security person why, got the answer...airport policy. Same question to Lufthansa girl at desk and got an indignant look and was told to shut up and stop questioning airport policy.
Why are we Brits being picked out for this sort of treatment??
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We had the same treatment at Munich recently, en route from London to Tirana. Two further security checks, including the X-raying of our hand luggage, while transferring between planes.
We were told it was due to the UK not being part of Schengen - but I thought Schengen had nothing to do with security?
We were told it was due to the UK not being part of Schengen - but I thought Schengen had nothing to do with security?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: OXF
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Schengen Agreement has everything to do with transit. Someone with ILtR in the UK will still require a visa to travel to the continent, or transit through one of its airports that requires transit visas (CPH is one, AMS is another). The same is generally not the case vice versa, unless the pax is from a country that is required to have a UK visa (Commonwealth is generally not an issue as 3-month visas are granted at immigration on entry).
In Barcelona and Porto you are also required to undergo two security checks, although not with x-ray. If you travel internally (i.e. within the UK) with a connection to the continent, you are also screened twice, once for domestic security, once for security to the continent).
The US and the TSA pretty much do this based on passport. If you are from any country other than the US, especially those from Africa, Latin America, Asia (Japan excl), you will be pulled over for 'random' inspection, plus a secondary inspection at the gate (and boy, if your boarding pass was not marked by TSA, you will have an almighty rumpus at the gate).
S.
In Barcelona and Porto you are also required to undergo two security checks, although not with x-ray. If you travel internally (i.e. within the UK) with a connection to the continent, you are also screened twice, once for domestic security, once for security to the continent).
The US and the TSA pretty much do this based on passport. If you are from any country other than the US, especially those from Africa, Latin America, Asia (Japan excl), you will be pulled over for 'random' inspection, plus a secondary inspection at the gate (and boy, if your boarding pass was not marked by TSA, you will have an almighty rumpus at the gate).
S.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rafelle
What us Brits done now?
Guest
Posts: n/a
What us Brits done now?
And the UK is not a Schengen signatory.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: EDDS
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not a transit issue. Departed from FRA last Tuesday night to IST. Passed "normal" security check (laptop out, jacket off, belt off, shoes off, watch off, etc.), then got dressed again and passed passport control. Down the escalators and another bl**dy security check. When I asked about the person responsible for this insanity who would accept my complaint, I was told that as a German taxpayer I had no recourse.
Well, at least the last lot who gave us such brainless stop-and-search checks had names.... Himmler, Heydrich, Goebbels, Schellenberg. And their address was the Reichssicherheitshauptamt. Now, it's an anonymous apparatus working against you.
Well, at least the last lot who gave us such brainless stop-and-search checks had names.... Himmler, Heydrich, Goebbels, Schellenberg. And their address was the Reichssicherheitshauptamt. Now, it's an anonymous apparatus working against you.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If they have a gate change at FRA, they march the passengers (100+ when I saw it done) back through the "insecure" lounge area, and then bypass the first security check queue by simply herding people through a door beside the checkpoint, without going through the search or X-ray.
Any who protests at this absurdity, comments too loudly to a neighbour or even laughs in a particularly sarcastic way, is threatened with being offloaded for being disruptive. Several of us were so threatened.
Any who protests at this absurdity, comments too loudly to a neighbour or even laughs in a particularly sarcastic way, is threatened with being offloaded for being disruptive. Several of us were so threatened.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: OXF
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Viktor, unfortunately Germany is a bit schizophrenic where its love-hate affair with the US is concerned. On the one hand they want to be their own nation, on the other they'll bend over backwards to assist the US with anything they get asked. The whole terrorist era in the seventies and eighties didn't help the paranoia much.
IST is Turkey, which is NOT an EU country or a Schengen signatory, so I wouldn't be surprised at a secondary check.
S.
IST is Turkey, which is NOT an EU country or a Schengen signatory, so I wouldn't be surprised at a secondary check.
S.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: EDDS
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VAFFPAX, I was on my way to IST, not back from it.
Anyway, I did not notice any Heckler & Koch or Walther shop between the first and second security check, so where would I pick any weapon from?
Anyway, I did not notice any Heckler & Koch or Walther shop between the first and second security check, so where would I pick any weapon from?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: OXF
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesn't matter if you're on the way there or back... you are departing EU/Schengen country. When I fly ex-BCN or ex-OPO to non-EU (i.e. near African) locations, I am also made to do two security checks.
As for the HK comment - It's not about what you may possibly buy, but what you may be given. There are people who can get past the first security point, but not the second (different privileges). I've had that in Africa where I could go airside in the Terminal, but not actually step onto the tarmac outside (i.e. couldn't go past departure gates). A second check makes sure you don't have something that shouldn't make it past security.
S.
As for the HK comment - It's not about what you may possibly buy, but what you may be given. There are people who can get past the first security point, but not the second (different privileges). I've had that in Africa where I could go airside in the Terminal, but not actually step onto the tarmac outside (i.e. couldn't go past departure gates). A second check makes sure you don't have something that shouldn't make it past security.
S.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: EDDS
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VAFFPAX, I see you are trying hard to find a logical explanation, but there is none.
I use FRA twice or more monthly to fly to BOM, DEL, or MAA (all outside the Schengen territory). I never encounter a second check when doing so.
I use FRA twice or more monthly to fly to BOM, DEL, or MAA (all outside the Schengen territory). I never encounter a second check when doing so.
FRA has been doing this for a long time. I used to travel regularly on LH from NUE via FRA to BHX. Because the UK isn't a signatory to Schengen, flight to UK used to wind up boarding next to departures for such unsavoury destinations as Israel - and I wondered if this over to top security wasn't in some way due to the "company" which we were forced to keep, in the way of the destinations of adjacent aircraft.
Anyway, being outside Schengen makes arriving and departing a more longwinded process. How about starting a petition get get our government to sign up - soon! I for one am fed up being treated as a second class citizen within the EU.
Anyway, being outside Schengen makes arriving and departing a more longwinded process. How about starting a petition get get our government to sign up - soon! I for one am fed up being treated as a second class citizen within the EU.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They did this (second security check) for all BA flights from DUS for 3 years or more in departure area B. Dammed annoying it was too but I never figured it out. Then, seemingly overnight a couple of years ago, normality again. Flew FlyBe from there today via departures C and still only the one check.
Now my memory is hazy on this but I'm pretty sure that BA used to be two checks but the same route on LH was just the one - but I'm happy to stand corrected....
Now my memory is hazy on this but I'm pretty sure that BA used to be two checks but the same route on LH was just the one - but I'm happy to stand corrected....
Last edited by rjc54n; 28th Oct 2008 at 21:24. Reason: relevance
Sorry if its a daft question - but why is the UK not part of the Schengen agreement?
What makes "the Island" so special when as part of the EEC we have to endure the likes of Brussels telling us the fishing constraints that Scotland for example has to implement (potentially) yet we seem to be treated somewhat differently when flying between Europe and the "golden shores" of Blighty.
Nivsy
What makes "the Island" so special when as part of the EEC we have to endure the likes of Brussels telling us the fishing constraints that Scotland for example has to implement (potentially) yet we seem to be treated somewhat differently when flying between Europe and the "golden shores" of Blighty.
Nivsy
AFAIK (or recollect), secondary security checks only for UK or US flights. (Higher risk level = higher security level)
Of course, if they're departing from an area shared by other gates (UK flights from the dungeons in B Concourse for remote position departures, frinstance), then everyone gets the benefit.
To be honest, it's never bothered me.
The security people aren't as aggressively obnoxious (or as cerebrally challenged) as their UK or US counterparts, the process works smoothly, never missed a flight yet
Of course, if they're departing from an area shared by other gates (UK flights from the dungeons in B Concourse for remote position departures, frinstance), then everyone gets the benefit.
To be honest, it's never bothered me.
The security people aren't as aggressively obnoxious (or as cerebrally challenged) as their UK or US counterparts, the process works smoothly, never missed a flight yet
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: OXF
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nivsy, the reason is simple... If the UK had agreed to all Schengen requirements (it's signed up to some, but not all, including the immigration control agreement), it would've been forced to apply Schengen requirements to everyone, including Commonwealth countries (like many African countries, the Asian subcontinent etc). The Commonwealth was still bigger (and still is) than the EEA at the time, so it was better politically to put the border control at all points to the continent, rather than include the UK as a whole in the Schengen area and leave the rest of the Commonwealth in the cold.
It was a political decision, something that does make sense looking back at the political climate at the time, but considering recent changes in the UK's stance on immigration, doesn't anymore.
S.
It was a political decision, something that does make sense looking back at the political climate at the time, but considering recent changes in the UK's stance on immigration, doesn't anymore.
S.
FRA is where the security goon insisted on confiscating a 4 and 2 BA spanner from me. As if I could take an Airbus apart with it! Twerps.