No need to tolerate thugs like this
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central London
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No need to tolerate thugs like this
Despite the perceived glamour of flying as a career the day to day routine has its problems.
This story below underlines why it is time for aircrew to get tough.
From the BBC website
Air rage smoker jailed for attack
A 53-year-old man who terrified fellow passengers on board a holiday flight and assaulted an air steward has been jailed for 12 months.
Stephen Robinson clambered over seats to hit his victim after being told to put out a cigarette on the Thomas Cook Turkey to Newcastle flight in March.
At Newcastle Crown Court he admitted endangering the safety of the aircraft and causing actual bodily harm.
Robinson of Hope Town Lane, Darlington, forced the plane to be diverted.
The hearing on Friday heard how Robinson clambered over other passengers in his row of seats.
In the melee that followed airline steward Philip Miles was hit in the face causing damage to eight of his teeth, the court heard.
The busy Boeing 757, from Antalya to Newcastle, was diverted to Frankfurt in Germany where Robinson was removed.
Recorder Brian Forster QC said: "You terrified the people who were about you and you made the life of the aircraft crew very difficult."
In a report on the incident one passenger said: "I have never witnessed any behaviour like this before when I have flown and I hope I will never see it again." Tim Parkin, prosecuting, said Robinson offered the guilty plea on the basis that he admitted endangering other passengers but not the aircraft.
The court heard how Robinson became aggressive after trying to use a House of Fraser store card to buy drinks.
Cabin crew needed the help of passengers to restrain Robinson after the attack and held him down before he could be handcuffed.
Kristian Mills, defending, said Robinson had no money and was forced to eat leftovers from canteens as he roamed around the German airport for two days.
He eventually asked a charity to fund his flight home as nobody in the UK was willing to act as a guarantor.
The court was told that the judge had no power to ban Robinson from flying again, but that he had been blacklisted by Thomas Cook.
This story below underlines why it is time for aircrew to get tough.
From the BBC website
Air rage smoker jailed for attack
A 53-year-old man who terrified fellow passengers on board a holiday flight and assaulted an air steward has been jailed for 12 months.
Stephen Robinson clambered over seats to hit his victim after being told to put out a cigarette on the Thomas Cook Turkey to Newcastle flight in March.
At Newcastle Crown Court he admitted endangering the safety of the aircraft and causing actual bodily harm.
Robinson of Hope Town Lane, Darlington, forced the plane to be diverted.
The hearing on Friday heard how Robinson clambered over other passengers in his row of seats.
In the melee that followed airline steward Philip Miles was hit in the face causing damage to eight of his teeth, the court heard.
The busy Boeing 757, from Antalya to Newcastle, was diverted to Frankfurt in Germany where Robinson was removed.
Recorder Brian Forster QC said: "You terrified the people who were about you and you made the life of the aircraft crew very difficult."
In a report on the incident one passenger said: "I have never witnessed any behaviour like this before when I have flown and I hope I will never see it again." Tim Parkin, prosecuting, said Robinson offered the guilty plea on the basis that he admitted endangering other passengers but not the aircraft.
The court heard how Robinson became aggressive after trying to use a House of Fraser store card to buy drinks.
Cabin crew needed the help of passengers to restrain Robinson after the attack and held him down before he could be handcuffed.
Kristian Mills, defending, said Robinson had no money and was forced to eat leftovers from canteens as he roamed around the German airport for two days.
He eventually asked a charity to fund his flight home as nobody in the UK was willing to act as a guarantor.
The court was told that the judge had no power to ban Robinson from flying again, but that he had been blacklisted by Thomas Cook.
Last edited by Phil Space; 28th Sep 2007 at 21:12. Reason: To show his face
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be nice to think that it would be possible for his name and passport number to be shared with other UK airlines so no other crews have to be subjected to this vile piece of scum.
I like the bit about him wandering around FRA starving for three days though. Serves him right.
I like the bit about him wandering around FRA starving for three days though. Serves him right.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brrrrrr
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fatboy slim
It would be nice to think that it would be possible for his name and passport number to be shared with other UK airlines so no other crews have to be subjected to this vile piece of scum.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oman
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excuse a heli pilot for also asking Beausoleil's question. Why didn't our European brothers in Germany arrest him? Is there no pan-european arrangement to deal with arseholes like this?
Thank God I don't have to transport his like!
Thank God I don't have to transport his like!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by whoateallthepies
Why didn't our European brothers in Germany arrest him? Is there no pan-european arrangement to deal with arseholes like this?
* because there was no reason to suspect he had committed an offence over which Germany has jurisdiction
* because the U.K. had not issued an international arrest warrant under EU rules
The crew presumably wanted him off the plane as fast as possible, and didn't want to circle while the U.K. authorities completed the paperwork for an arrest warrant.
With increasing numbers of incidents of this type, it may well be a good idea for aircrew to familiarise themselves with the legal possibilities and procedures for dealing with such things. In saying this, I do not mean to suggest that the British crew were not so familiar. But questions on this thread so far suggest that others might not be.
PBL
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Before we go too far down the thread of 'why wasn't he arrested?', he was...or at least the German police came onto the aircraft and removed him themselves. Why he then ended up roaming the airport I don't know, but he was last seen by the crew being carted off by Frankfurt's finest...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: A town called malice
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as I know its up to the crew whether they want the passenger arrested and charges pressed. It would involve court cases etc for the crew in Germany which can be a hassle to say the least but ensures these scumbags don't get away lightly. Otherwise he's off the hook, which seems to have been the case here....
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thing that surprises me most is that he has actually been jailed!!! Sadly, in many cases, the punishment handed down is disproportionately trivial for the distress caused - the law simply doesn't take it very seriously... (from personal experience)
However, in this instance, there was a good result - with time off for good behaviour and the current obsession for early release he shouldn't be out until at least... next week?
However, in this instance, there was a good result - with time off for good behaviour and the current obsession for early release he shouldn't be out until at least... next week?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norwich, UK
Age: 71
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tightslot said:
It would certainly make a lot of sense - if they can do that for known football hooligans it must be possible, especially when you've actually got someone in court.
Must admit, this was the best item on the lunchtime news at work yesterday!
why cannot those convicted of air-rage type offences have their passports removed?
Must admit, this was the best item on the lunchtime news at work yesterday!
Riding the Euro Gravy Plane
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Strasbourg
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The article doesn't give any indication if this individual was jailed for ABH or endangerment of the aircraft or a combination of the two. I suspect it's more for ABH, which is a fairly serious and violent offence committed against some one who was carrying their employment duties and a 12 month jail term seems appropriate.
Taking passports away from people under such circumstance probably isn't appropriate, justified, practical and certainly not possible. Yes, football thugs have to surrender their passports when some international games take place but there is specific legislation which allows this.
I would bet money that this guy probably has some sort of criminal history, you don't become violent overnight at the age of 53 nor do violent people restrict their activities to aircraft. Taking his passport away wouldn't, in anycase, take away his ability to board aircraft, there are plenty of domestic flights in the UK.
Taking passports away from people under such circumstance probably isn't appropriate, justified, practical and certainly not possible. Yes, football thugs have to surrender their passports when some international games take place but there is specific legislation which allows this.
I would bet money that this guy probably has some sort of criminal history, you don't become violent overnight at the age of 53 nor do violent people restrict their activities to aircraft. Taking his passport away wouldn't, in anycase, take away his ability to board aircraft, there are plenty of domestic flights in the UK.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Taking passports away from people under such circumstance probably isn't appropriate, justified, practical and certainly not possible
- Appropriate - I'd suggest that it is so and would have a deterrent value?
- Justified - Ditto?
- Practical - In practical terms, the passport is physically removed and/or cancelled - surely not impossible.
- Not Possible - This is what I was querying initially: Would additional legislation be required or is the possession of a passport a right that can be easily withdrawn?
I accept your point about domestic flights, however within the UK we can rely on a marginally more robust legal response to these kinds of incidents than on international flights.
Riding the Euro Gravy Plane
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Strasbourg
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tightslot
I didn't really explain clearly what I meant. Because someone has been convicted of an offence which ocurred onboard an aircraft it isn't appropriate or justified to withdraw their passport. Aircraft sometimes cross borders and sometimes don't. The punishment simply isn't appropriate. If you're trying to prevent people from being violent on aircraft it wouldn't work. Also, if someone has a violent nature, like the chap in question, it's unlikely they would restrict their crimes to aircraft. I suspect the aforementioned toerag may have an alcohol problem and becomes violent when his supply is cut off.
As to taking away peoples passports, I'm sure the government can do this, in certain circumstances. But, if you were to withdraw a passport you'd be involved in a legal minefield where you, as a government, would be held accountable. The UK doesn't have a constitution but there are all sorts of things which are now enshrined in law which give people certain rights and the govt. has a legal obligation to protect and guarantee such rights, if they don't they end up in court. If you were to remove someone's passport the government would be in violation of a whole host of human rights laws. Let's just take one; citizens have the "right to leave to leave the country" If you don't have a passport it's difficult to leave. That's just one example but there are many, many more. We could move on to EU employment directives, free movement of trade etc
Is removal of passport a deterrent ? for sure it is, but in my opinion so is 12 months in prison. Hope this clarifies what I meant.
I didn't really explain clearly what I meant. Because someone has been convicted of an offence which ocurred onboard an aircraft it isn't appropriate or justified to withdraw their passport. Aircraft sometimes cross borders and sometimes don't. The punishment simply isn't appropriate. If you're trying to prevent people from being violent on aircraft it wouldn't work. Also, if someone has a violent nature, like the chap in question, it's unlikely they would restrict their crimes to aircraft. I suspect the aforementioned toerag may have an alcohol problem and becomes violent when his supply is cut off.
As to taking away peoples passports, I'm sure the government can do this, in certain circumstances. But, if you were to withdraw a passport you'd be involved in a legal minefield where you, as a government, would be held accountable. The UK doesn't have a constitution but there are all sorts of things which are now enshrined in law which give people certain rights and the govt. has a legal obligation to protect and guarantee such rights, if they don't they end up in court. If you were to remove someone's passport the government would be in violation of a whole host of human rights laws. Let's just take one; citizens have the "right to leave to leave the country" If you don't have a passport it's difficult to leave. That's just one example but there are many, many more. We could move on to EU employment directives, free movement of trade etc
Is removal of passport a deterrent ? for sure it is, but in my opinion so is 12 months in prison. Hope this clarifies what I meant.
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The article doesn't give any indication if this individual was jailed for ABH or endangerment of the aircraft or a combination of the two
The fuller story was that he had been found guilty at an earlier hearing at which the judge reccomended a ban from all aircraft.
This was a sentancing hearing with a different judge who stated he did not have the power to ban.
The guy actually has a holiday home in Turkey & is classed as a frequent flyer as well.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norwich, UK
Age: 71
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always thought a UK pasport was a privelege, bestowed by Her Majasty's Government, requesting that a British citizen would be allowed to pass, unhindered, across international borders?
A privelege which, like most, could be withdrawn at any time - otherwise what would be the point of complicated application forms - you may as well by one when you by your travel ticket if it is a right.
Or am I being a little old-fashioned here?
A privelege which, like most, could be withdrawn at any time - otherwise what would be the point of complicated application forms - you may as well by one when you by your travel ticket if it is a right.
Or am I being a little old-fashioned here?
Riding the Euro Gravy Plane
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Strasbourg
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FF
The right to leave the UK is something to which you are entitled, it is not a privilege. There are many 20th century examples of societies which did limit the movements of their citizens, the one which springs to mind is the USSR, though there are others.
Getting back to the subject of this thread, the person in question was dealt with by the courts and was sent to prison for 12 months. Personally, I think this is an appropriate punishment. Violent conduct is unacceptable, especially when the victim is simply doing their job, on this occasion the Court agreed and I think everyone should be satisfied with the end result.
The right to leave the UK is something to which you are entitled, it is not a privilege. There are many 20th century examples of societies which did limit the movements of their citizens, the one which springs to mind is the USSR, though there are others.
Getting back to the subject of this thread, the person in question was dealt with by the courts and was sent to prison for 12 months. Personally, I think this is an appropriate punishment. Violent conduct is unacceptable, especially when the victim is simply doing their job, on this occasion the Court agreed and I think everyone should be satisfied with the end result.
Paid...Persona Grata
Taking his passport away wouldn't, in anycase, take away his ability to board aircraft, there are plenty of domestic flights in the UK.
Seriously, though, why can't FAs have a taser to restrain thugs like this?
UFO