Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Rough weather at BHD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jan 2007, 12:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast
Age: 60
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rough weather at BHD

I tried this query on airlines, airports and routes but I think I was using the wrong forum so I'll try passengers and slf instead.
Recently, during particularly stormy weather one early morning in Belfast I had a look at BHD departures and arrivals on the airport's website.
The first bmi flight from Heathrow (an A320) had been diverted to BFS but the Aer Arran ATR from Cork landed more or less as scheduled.
Some Flybe services operated by Dash 8-400's were cancelled but others continued to operate.
This is probably an anorakish thing to ask but why would an A320 have more difficulty getting in to BHD in gales than an ATR?
Why were Dash 8-400's able to operate while others remained on the ground?
Is it really up to each individual pilot to make the decision?
It was very windy but as a passenger I've landed and taken off at BHD in similar conditions.
frequentflyer2 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2007, 12:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 36
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by frequentflyer2
I tried this query on airlines, airports and routes but I think I was using the wrong forum so I'll try passengers and slf instead.
Recently, during particularly stormy weather one early morning in Belfast I had a look at BHD departures and arrivals on the airport's website.
The first bmi flight from Heathrow (an A320) had been diverted to BFS but the Aer Arran ATR from Cork landed more or less as scheduled.
Some Flybe services operated by Dash 8-400's were cancelled but others continued to operate.
This is probably an anorakish thing to ask but why would an A320 have more difficulty getting in to BHD in gales than an ATR?
Why were Dash 8-400's able to operate while others remained on the ground?
Is it really up to each individual pilot to make the decision?
It was very windy but as a passenger I've landed and taken off at BHD in similar conditions.
The main factor is pilot's discretion. If the pilot feels he's out of his limits, or he's had to perform a missed approach/went around a couple of times to no avail the diversion may be considered.

Also company SOP's may come into play... although I'm not sure of this since I'm not an airline pilot (airline jocks feel free to correct me on this one if I'm wrong).

Cheers

Smithy
Captain Smithy is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2007, 13:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In addition to the variations mentioned in the previous posts, different aircraft types will have different limitations affecting their performance: For example, based on the information shown in your post, jet aircraft were diverting, whereas turboprop aircraft were not.

Weather conditions will also vary from one approach to another, and also within the same approach.

Without monitoring each individual flight, it is difficult to know the precise reasons for decisions taken: It really is up to each pilot, within the established boundaries for each approach, and I'm absolutely relaxed about that - it's as it should be.

Hope this helps...
TightSlot is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2007, 12:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 have more difficulty getting in to BHD in gales than an ATR
Not a pilot...but a BFS Atco.....A320 is considerably heavier than a Dash 8 Runway22/04 at BHD is a LOT shorter than 25/07 at BFS ergo it would seem it would be easier to stop on a LONGER runway?(not to mention 17/35 which might have been into wind.) Maybe "Keep it Lit" can assist?

Last edited by eastern wiseguy; 11th Jan 2007 at 23:22.
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 18:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eastern wiseguy
Not a pilot...but a BFS Atco.....A320 is considerably heavier than a Dash 8 Runway22/04 at BHD is a LOT shorter than 25/07 at BFS ergo it would seem it would be easier to stop on a LONGER runway?(not to mention 17/35 which might have been into wind.) Maybe "Keep it Lit" can assist?
Is 17/35 not already closed? BFS is going to become single ops mainly due to cost (alot more expensive to operate two runways) but also to aid land for expansion of terminals.
SelectMgt is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 21:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may be way off the mark but I've always believed (stand to be corrected) that aircraft with a high wing (ie) Q400, ATR, 146 are typically more stable in crosswinds than those aircraft with low wings 320,737,195

This could have been the reason why. To my knowledge Flybe had no diversions during this time at BHD, Q400 or 146
JobsaGoodun is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 21:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SelectMgt
Is 17/35 not already closed? BFS is going to become single ops mainly due to cost (alot more expensive to operate two runways) but also to aid land for expansion of terminals.
No it is open and serviceable....


Mind you there have been whispers......
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 22:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This might be more to do with whether or not the aircraft concerned are fitted with windshear warning equipment or not. If the warning goes off you have no choice but to go around , if its not fitted (atr doesn't have it assume dash 400 same) it cant go off and then its up to the pilot!
towser is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 07:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by JobsaGoodun
I may be way off the mark but I've always believed (stand to be corrected) that aircraft with a high wing (ie) Q400, ATR, 146 are typically more stable in crosswinds than those aircraft with low wings 320,737,195
If so it would be the reverse of what is experienced in light aircraft, where a Cessna (high wing) is notably more active in roll during a windy approach than a Piper (low wing) is. Seems to apply to each manufacturer's whole range.
WHBM is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 17:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe the big boys are more worried about sudden turbulence leaving them with a lap full of hot tea - us TP boys only get cold water.

Maude Charlee is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.