Gongs on offer for stupid security measures
Thread Starter
Gongs on offer for stupid security measures
Human rights watchdog Privacy International has re-launched its hunt for the World's most stupid security measures.
The "Stupid Security" awards aims to highlight the absurdities of so-called security procedures that make little contribution to real security improvements. The international compo aims to unearth the world's most pointless, intrusive, stupid and self-serving security measures.
Privacy International's director, Simon Davies, said the organisation had taken the initiative because of "innumerable" security initiatives around the world that had "absolutely no genuine security benefit". This will be the second competition in the series, following inaugural awards in 2003 which attracted 5,000 entries.
Privacy International, the outfit behind the Big Brother awards, says that the time has never been better to cast a critical eye on security in its widest sense. "Even before the recent 'liquid bomb' scare a whole army of bumbling amateurs has taken it upon themselves to figure out pointless, annoying, intrusive, illusory and just plain stupid measures to 'protect' our security," it said.
Gongs will be awarded in five categories: the Most Egregiously Stupid Award, Most Inexplicably Stupid Award, Most Annoyingly Stupid Award, Most Flagrantly Intrusive Award and Most Stupidly Counter Productive Award. Privacy International cites a few choice examples of the sort of pointless measures it is seeking to hold up to ridicule; including an airport that this month emptied out a full plane because a passenger was drinking from a lemonade bottle, to the British schools that fingerprint their children to "stop" the theft of library books, to the airline company that refused to allow passengers to bring books or magazines onto the plane.
There are real concerns about security, of course. Privacy International argues that unworkable security practices and illusory security measures do nothing to address issues of real public concern. They only hinder the public, intrude unnecessarily into our private lives and often reduce us to the status of cattle.
"The situation has become ridiculous" said Davies. "Security has become the smokescreen for incompetent and robotic managers the world over".
Although the airline industry has become the most prominent offender in introducing pointless security measures it is far from alone in its folly. For example, a rail company recently banned train-spotters on the grounds of security.
Meanwhile the security desk of a US office building complained because paramedics rushing to attend a heart-attack victim had failed to sign-in.
Privacy International is calling for nominations to name and shame the worst offenders. Entries, open to anyone from any country, need to be submitted by 31 October. Nominations can be sent to [email protected]. The competition will be judged by an international panel of well-known security experts, public policy specialists, privacy advocates and journalists.
The "Stupid Security" awards aims to highlight the absurdities of so-called security procedures that make little contribution to real security improvements. The international compo aims to unearth the world's most pointless, intrusive, stupid and self-serving security measures.
Privacy International's director, Simon Davies, said the organisation had taken the initiative because of "innumerable" security initiatives around the world that had "absolutely no genuine security benefit". This will be the second competition in the series, following inaugural awards in 2003 which attracted 5,000 entries.
Privacy International, the outfit behind the Big Brother awards, says that the time has never been better to cast a critical eye on security in its widest sense. "Even before the recent 'liquid bomb' scare a whole army of bumbling amateurs has taken it upon themselves to figure out pointless, annoying, intrusive, illusory and just plain stupid measures to 'protect' our security," it said.
Gongs will be awarded in five categories: the Most Egregiously Stupid Award, Most Inexplicably Stupid Award, Most Annoyingly Stupid Award, Most Flagrantly Intrusive Award and Most Stupidly Counter Productive Award. Privacy International cites a few choice examples of the sort of pointless measures it is seeking to hold up to ridicule; including an airport that this month emptied out a full plane because a passenger was drinking from a lemonade bottle, to the British schools that fingerprint their children to "stop" the theft of library books, to the airline company that refused to allow passengers to bring books or magazines onto the plane.
There are real concerns about security, of course. Privacy International argues that unworkable security practices and illusory security measures do nothing to address issues of real public concern. They only hinder the public, intrude unnecessarily into our private lives and often reduce us to the status of cattle.
"The situation has become ridiculous" said Davies. "Security has become the smokescreen for incompetent and robotic managers the world over".
Although the airline industry has become the most prominent offender in introducing pointless security measures it is far from alone in its folly. For example, a rail company recently banned train-spotters on the grounds of security.
Meanwhile the security desk of a US office building complained because paramedics rushing to attend a heart-attack victim had failed to sign-in.
Privacy International is calling for nominations to name and shame the worst offenders. Entries, open to anyone from any country, need to be submitted by 31 October. Nominations can be sent to [email protected]. The competition will be judged by an international panel of well-known security experts, public policy specialists, privacy advocates and journalists.
JAS
Too mean to buy a long personal title
to the airline company that refused to allow passengers to bring books or magazines onto the plane
But then, these attention-hungry and publicity-seeking organisations don't always do so well on the research front, do they? Thank goodness there are some NGOs who are actually good at what they do.
Globaliser,
>How to demonstrate one's complete ignorance of the very issue that one is criticising, in one easy step.<
So how does someone timing trains get information useful to a terrorist that he can't get from timetables on the web and on-line train running information - also on the web - from an official web site too?
There's far too much paranoia and unjustified control in the name of security.
>How to demonstrate one's complete ignorance of the very issue that one is criticising, in one easy step.<
So how does someone timing trains get information useful to a terrorist that he can't get from timetables on the web and on-line train running information - also on the web - from an official web site too?
There's far too much paranoia and unjustified control in the name of security.
Too mean to buy a long personal title
Originally Posted by radeng
There's far too much paranoia and unjustified control in the name of security.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Age: 64
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radeng - Don't think that one qualifies. Anyone knows that what arrives at a station nowadays bears scant relation to what is printed in a timetable!
However, how about this one: Here in Asia, most hotels have security checks for cars. Visiting one major hotel last evening, the well meaning chap doing the checks stopped me at the barrier (which was within 20 metres of the hotel lobby), opened the boot of the car and ran his metal detecting wand officiously over my golf club bag(which of course caused it to bleep madly) before waving me through.
However, how about this one: Here in Asia, most hotels have security checks for cars. Visiting one major hotel last evening, the well meaning chap doing the checks stopped me at the barrier (which was within 20 metres of the hotel lobby), opened the boot of the car and ran his metal detecting wand officiously over my golf club bag(which of course caused it to bleep madly) before waving me through.
