Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

UK to introduce exit border checks

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

UK to introduce exit border checks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jul 2006, 08:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Evanelpus
Where my partner works the entire contract staff are foreign, mainly Poles and the like.
As Poland is a member of the EU and so Poles can work anywhere in the EU, what's your point and its relevance to this debate?
Groundloop is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 08:23
  #22 (permalink)  

Lady Lexxington
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Manor House
Age: 43
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shall we get this thread back on track eh? This is about exit border controls. It is about catching those who are here illegaly, not those who are entitled to be here under EU rules or who have been granted asylum.

No one has any problem with a person who comes to this country and contributes to it.
lexxity is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 12:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lexxity has hit the nail on the head, if they contribute.

The problem with the particular Poles in question (as mentioned in my previous post) is that they are a lazy workshy bunch of sods who came here to have an easy life and when threatened with discipliniary action,claim they are being discriminate against because they are 'foreign'.

Back to the original topic.........
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 08:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not about immigrants per se. It's about whether a refugee from war torn Somalia is able to function well in a 21st century western secular society. Or whether a goat herd from an agrarian who gets to marry a young british girl he's never met for a passport is really what this country needs.
Some succeed. Many build ghettos of isolation and the debate is being hijacked by extremists from both sides.
As a Scot in England, I am a foreigner to an extent but at least I have the skills to fake it......
However knowing who has a right to be here and who doesn't can only help things along.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 11:12
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Age: 64
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never understood the idea behind not having exit checks. The visa issuing process for the UK is a bureaucratic dog's dinner and an unpleasant experience for the applicants. However, once through it, there are no checks to see if the person actually leaves. You can't pretend that anyone is actually going to be stopped and checked to see if they are an illegal immigrant, once they are out and about in today's PC UK society? Honestly, I don't know why they bother. It seems the policy is to make it as hard and nasty an experience as possible for someone to get into the UK, but then once they are there, just give up. It's a lot like Hong Kong before reunification, where Chinese immigrants were basically allowed to stay, as long as they had the luck or skill to get past the border and into town.

Reintroducing exit checks is a start towards effectively controlling immigration. I have no opinion on the rights or wrongs of immigration per se, but if you don't have a working control system, then you might as well scrap the whole thing.
Bangkokeasy is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 20:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please keep this thread on the topic originally raised and avoid jetblast style posts - from here on in, I'll delete further posts that make absurd generalisations about nationalities or that stray off topic.

Thank you
TightSlot is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2006, 00:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hove
Age: 72
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exit controls are one thing but as already mentioned we should have tighter controls for the entry points and better ways of dealing with anyone caught entering illegally.

I've heard of at least two occassions and dealt directly with cases where police officers caught some foreign persons found in the back of a lorry. Once they were brought into police custody we contacted the immigration officers to be told "Give them a rail warrant to Croydon and tell them to make their own way to the immigration offices". When asked if an escort was coming to collect them we were told no. Later it was not a surprise to be told they had not turned up. A neighbouring force had the same problem some 2 years later, which this time made the news.

I wonder how many have skipped in this way?
clicker is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2006, 23:08
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South England
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Golf Charlie Charlie
Right after 7 July last year, they did reintroduce passport checks on departure at LHR Terminal 3 (just past security) and I think at some or all other LHR terminals, but I see that has been discontinued. Maybe that was just some sort of trial for a general reintroduction.
It's still there in the evenings in T3 for certain departures imigration always keep their eye on!

I think it's a brilliant idea.

About a year ago we had a spate of people selling selling their UK visas their passports as well as forged UK visas and passports - and they were all caught by immigration in T3 departures.
striparella is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2006, 20:41
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have we worked out why or been fed some spin as to why it is actually going to take 8 years to reinstate the border controls? Like that is a huge amount of time in anyones book!
potkettleblack is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2006, 11:53
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,084
Received 292 Likes on 163 Posts
While I can fully understand the point of keeping a very close eye on the coming and goings of non-EU traffic, most other EU countries have signed up to the Schengen agreement, which gives true freedom of movement between participating states.

Surely, if the UK took a more enlightened approach, then the manpower saved by not checking EU arrivals and departures could be redeployed on beefing up checks on those coming to and from non-EU (Schengen) countries, and this be achieved sometime before the next 8 years.

I do know that it's an absolute pleasure driving and flying across most EU internal borders without the nonsence of border controls - once that it is I've left the UK!
ATNotts is online now  
Old 30th Jul 2006, 13:57
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 648
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a personal note i agree with previous post. its very obvious at a lot of european airports that flights to the UK means you are directed through some form of passport control and towards gates that are for UK flights only while those travelling to other destinations within Europe pass through to departure areas without any need for control. In my experience entry to the UK always results in passport checks and ofcourse in some occassions lenghty details as only 1 or 2 immigration officers appear only to be on duty.

Also nowadays due to electronic ticketing at lot of passport checks are undertaken by the airline.

I should think the introduction of departure checks from the UK will result in just more delays for the hard hit passenger - however i can understand the requirement. I just hope they have plenty of immigration/frontier personnel on duty - and some how i doubt that.


Nivsy
nivsy is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2006, 14:05
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by potkettleblack
Have we worked out why or been fed some spin as to why it is actually going to take 8 years to reinstate the border controls? Like that is a huge amount of time in anyones book!
It has now taken over 10 years NOT to introduce the the national database containing the names of all holders of, and applicants for, firearms and shotgun permits in UK. This is a measure which was promised after the killings at Dunblane and should have been easy. This makes 8 years to re-intruduce border exit checks look really really speedy!
A2QFI is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2006, 11:51
  #33 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ATNotts
Surely, if the UK took a more enlightened approach, then the manpower saved by not checking EU arrivals and departures could be redeployed on beefing up checks on those coming to and from non-EU (Schengen) countries, and this be achieved sometime before the next 8 years.
There are other issues involved in this, though. One very obvious one, from practical experience, is the different visa lists operated by the UK/Ireland and by Schengenland. There is a huge practical impact on countries with many low-risk visitors like South Africa. If we were to join Schengen, a vast amount of manpower would then be diverted into issuing countless thousands of visas to South Africans.

This illustrates how resource-saving equations are not always easy for the general public to resolve.

And that leaves aside completely the question of whether there is any need for either the UK/Ireland or Schengenland to demand visas of South African visitors.
Globaliser is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 15:17
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hampshire,England
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uniforms or Civvies

After many years of passing back & forth between LHR & entry points in the USA it always made an impression on me as to how smart the Americans looked whether police or imigration or customs, on coming into LHR the police,customs & security were a scruffy lot, so perhaps we had better leave imigration in civvies.
J.Don. is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 15:32
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Summer
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Globaliser being S.A. a country where a very large part of the population is of very low income, they are seen as potential illegal immigrants hence the visa requirement.
el ! is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 19:01
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 648
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our lot may sometimes look scruffy as posted above but at least, unlike our American cousins - in general are not rude and make all pax feel like a criminal!!
nivsy is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 19:22
  #37 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by el !
Globaliser being S.A. a country where a very large part of the population is of very low income, they are seen as potential illegal immigrants hence the visa requirement.
I can see that argument.

But the UK is probably the European country that is most hysterical about illegal immigration, and we do not have a visa requirement for South Africans. And this is despite the fact that we speak one of the two official South African languages that are of European origin, so would be a natural destination for many South Africans

Clearly, therefore, the fear is not in fact justified.

Moreover, there are many South Africans who have a genuine connection with the UK and for whom a visa requirement would be extremely onerous. I can see this (and similar situations) therefore being a real stumbling block to joining Schengenland and having to bring our visa list into line with the Schengenland list.
Globaliser is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 19:29
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Internal ID checks

For a number of months, I was flying from Cardiff to Belfast and almost without exception, when arriving back in Wales, we were asked to produce ID by, non-uniformed 'officers'. I've deliberately put officers in apostrophes as I have no idea who they were. I asked why we needed to show ID and the response was a frosty, "Security" followed by a few minutes of questionning (even though they had seen me and my passport for weeks before). Actually, thinking about it, sometimes we were asked for ID by the same people flying out of Cardiff.

I wondered why this took place, as I was travelling from one part of the UK to another. I was never asked for ID travelling from Cardiff to London on the train or when flying into City, for example. Was NI singled out due to its history of troubles?

Any ideas?
CWL2YOW is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 19:33
  #39 (permalink)  

Lady Lexxington
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Manor House
Age: 43
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Special branch, standard practice on BFS/BHD flights.
lexxity is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 19:37
  #40 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CWL2YOW
I've deliberately put officers in apostrophes as I have no idea who they were.
Special Branch, I'd guess.

[ETA:] Blast, beaten to it by lexxity.
Globaliser is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.