Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Surprising fare differences between classes...

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Surprising fare differences between classes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Mar 2006, 07:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surprising fare differences between classes...

Reading another link to Airline Business, they quoted the following fare yields for BA London-New York Sector (per km):

1.70p in economy, 33.80p in business, and 59.44p in first.

I wonder how airlines got to a position of there being such a massive difference between basic and luxury services.

For example, I can get a cheap economy hotel room in London for £70, but a luxury 5-star hotel room for maybe £280, a factor of 4:1.

Would any hotel business get away with charging £1400 for a hotel room in London, or even £2500, scaled as per the BA fares?

I'm not particularly complaining, in fact quite in admiration of how a business can get away with establishing such differences as "normal". Is there any other service industry which can boast similar factors between basic/luxury products?

Is it a lack of competition on such sectors that enables such massive yields? i.e. LHR slots all sewn up?
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 10:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AKA Supply and Demand. Lots of hotels and beds in this world, not really that many planes.

Not sure about the yields though, would have thought like for like tickets would put Biz class at about 5 times yield to Economy with First maybe 1.3 times over biz. And given the footprint of a club world bed against an economy seat its per inch occupied going to be very close on price.
manintheback is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 10:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bristol,UK
Posts: 225
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Have you not tried the Royal Suite of the Lanesborough Hotel?, £4,500 per night.
under_exposed is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 10:28
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The yields I got from Airline Business, but no doubt the LHR-New York sector seems to be extremely profitable. My guess is that there is a lot more competition in the Economy class for this sector as it's not so important to fly from LHR.

Anyone know the cabin space area ratios for the different BA classes? As in how much more area Biz takes up over Economy etc.?
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 10:30
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by under_exposed
Have you not tried the Royal Suite of the Lanesborough Hotel?, £4,500 per night.
Ah, but in air travel terms, that's the private 777 with king beds and jacuzzis
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 11:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: He's on the limb to nowhere
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by manintheback
.... given the footprint of a club world bed against an economy seat its per inch occupied going to be very close on price.
If one looks at the BA 747 confurations on seatguru, and get your ruler out, it appears you can fit approximately 80 economy class seats in the same space as you get 32 business class seats.

So, if the 1.7p/km is purely for space rented on the plane, you would expect to pay about 4.25p/km in business. Still a bit to go before you get to 33p. I know it isn't made up by the price of the wine, that's easy to find work out. One can get a "BA club class standard" bottle of wine for less than a tenner at Majestic, and often for around a fiver when they are doing their deals

I would say that 1.7p per kilometer in economy must be one of the best travel bargains to be had. 33.8p in business one of the worst.
slim_slag is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 12:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Y class doesnt pay enough to create a profit!!! Thats why the airlines concentrate on their club/first loads!
apaddyinuk is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 12:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by apaddyinuk
Y class doesnt pay enough to create a profit!!! Thats why the airlines concentrate on their club/first loads!
Then why have Y class at all?

From the same article, 1.70 on BA LHR-NYC is not the cheapest economy price this article mentions. 1.44 on SQ LHR-SYD is yet cheaper.

One assumes that the price of the cheapest seat should be determined by fuel costs. Flying an empty seat rather than filling it at a discount basically burns the fuel needed to deliver the extra payload of one extra passenger.

But if you leave all the seats empty because no one wants a ticket even at the discount price, then you still need to burn a lot of fuel to deliver the empty airframe. Obviously, some passengers should pay more than the marginal cost of delivering them! But who will pay?

If Y class does not create profits and club and first loads pay for the flight then the obvious things to do would be
a) just sell no Y tickets and thereby save fuel
b) then rip out all the Y seats and let your club and first passengers play tennis or have a dance floor or something such there - this way they benefit more than just from their seats
c) give more comfortable accommodation inside the same space, like scatter real full-length mattresses or double beds all across the rear cabin for your club and first passengers
d) save the costs of hauling around the weight and drag of a big airframe, and have a moderate-sized airframe with spacious interior and no Y seats whatever.

It seems that Maxjet and Eos are currently trying d).
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 13:46
  #9 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Part of the difference seems to be accounted for by standard journalistic stunts via selective use of numbers. What are they comparing? Base fares only? Do they include surcharges, taxes, etc? What time frame did they price? How many price points did they use for their survey?

For example, the economy class yield seems to be consistent with current sale fares - ie, fares that are well below the normal published lowest economy fares. However, there may have been no sale or deep discount fares available for business class travel, particularly if they were looking at travel in the relatively near future, and the yield appears to reflect a full or fullish fare business class ticket.

If you look further out, you can buy published business class tickets for about half the yield that the article quotes.

This doesn't account for all of it, but a substantially different picture may emerge as the starting point for the analysis if you take a fair comparison between classes.

The other thing to remember is that there may be more business class passengers travelling on deep corporate discounts off the published fare, whereas economy class passengers may be more likely to be paying the actual published fare. If you calculate yield in each cabin based only on the published fares, you may end up substantially overestimating the yield that the airlines actually get from the premium cabins. That could further reduce the actual margin between Y and J yields.
Originally Posted by chornedsnorkack
Then why have Y class at all?
Because frequency is important for the business traveller. Having a full Y class paying the bills means that you can fly that small business class cabin more often, thus improving the attractiveness of your product.
Globaliser is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 14:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-class pricing is notably 'inelastic' (to use the economist's jargon). Travelling in F is rather like driving a Roller, the point is not cost-justification but to show the rest of the world how rich you are (and I realise that some travellers are on upgrades, spending miles etc.)

My view is supported by the price difference between a basic but practical new car (say £6,000 in the UK), the most expensive car that can be cost-justified in terms of bigger seats, more comfort etc. (I would say £25-30K, your mileage may vary) and the luxury car (£200K up to "how much would sir like to pay?").
Pax Vobiscum is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 18:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cebu, Philippines
Posts: 136
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard in the Far East (CX) a full Y class pays for the operational costs of the flight and the J and F makes up the profit. Not sure if Europe differs.

As Pax says, I think a great deal of F passengers are on upgrades or spending miles as I did this week between HKG and LHR.
HandyAndy is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 21:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Newbury, UK
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MichaelJP59
The yields I got from Airline Business, but no doubt the LHR-New York sector seems to be extremely profitable.
I would say that this route is far from extremely profitable as there is so much competition.

Routes tend to be extremely profitable when you have a monopoly (or near-monopoly) supplier to a relatively popular destination.
patdavies is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 21:48
  #13 (permalink)  
1DC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UK EAST COAST
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The variation is less on the UK to Oz journey. It costs more to fly to Oz in economy and less in business and first than it does to New York.
1DC is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2006, 06:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: He's on the limb to nowhere
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1DC, that certainly paints a different picture. Flights for next month to Sydney work out at about 2p per km in economy, 9p per km in business.

That would go along with the competition/supply and demand argument. There is no effective competitive market out of LHR to NYC, and most of the competition is from the US carriers and their business class service don't command a premium over BA's. So BA can charge a high price.

Out to Australia there is a whole slew of carriers providing one-stop service to Sydney from LHR, and in general their business class products do command a premium over BA. So BA need to cut their prices to get people in their club seats.

About time they totally deregulated Heathrow.
slim_slag is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2006, 07:05
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slim_slag
1DC, that certainly paints a different picture. Flights for next month to Sydney work out at about 2p per km in economy, 9p per km in business.
4.5:1 then; that's more the sort of ratio I would expect given the advantages of the business product over economy. It's clear that the market is distorted in certain sectors.
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2006, 08:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by chornedsnorkack
If Y class does not create profits and club and first loads pay for the flight then the obvious things to do would be
a) just sell no Y tickets and thereby save fuel
b) then rip out all the Y seats and let your club and first passengers play tennis or have a dance floor or something such there - this way they benefit more than just from their seats
c) give more comfortable accommodation inside the same space, like scatter real full-length mattresses or double beds all across the rear cabin for your club and first passengers
d) save the costs of hauling around the weight and drag of a big airframe, and have a moderate-sized airframe with spacious interior and no Y seats whatever.

It seems that Maxjet and Eos are currently trying d).
Maxjet is trying a variant of (d) which also involves dropping fares very considerably compared to normal C class fares. I think the jury is still out on the prospects for long-term success of these two. However a purer example of (d) is Privatair, now operating C-class-only transatlantic services for Lufthansa, Swiss and KLM (e.g. Amsterdam-Houston in a 737!). On routes with good business loads but proportionally little economy demand, they fly an all-business-class configured A319 or 737/BBJ on behalf of the major carrier. Seems to work well for all concerned. But of course only a relative handful of routes fall into that category.
Cyrano is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.