Source of altitude shown on inflight map?
Thread Starter
Source of altitude shown on inflight map?
(I guess this is as good a forum as any for this question)
Most of the inflight map systems show altitude as an exact thousand, to a degree of precision which I'm sure does not reflect reality. However today I flew LHR-NRT with Virgin and the altitude was all over the place, not just a few feet off but often showing several hundred different from a proper flight level - way off what I would personally consider acceptable when I'm the one flying the plane. (Even my relatively cheap GA autopilot can keep altitude to within 20' or so in smooth air).
So I was wondering where they get this data from? I find it hard to believe either:
a) AA, UA, BA etc can really fly to an accuracy of 0.5'
b) VS can't fly to an accuracy of 500'
Any illumination welcome...
n5296s
Most of the inflight map systems show altitude as an exact thousand, to a degree of precision which I'm sure does not reflect reality. However today I flew LHR-NRT with Virgin and the altitude was all over the place, not just a few feet off but often showing several hundred different from a proper flight level - way off what I would personally consider acceptable when I'm the one flying the plane. (Even my relatively cheap GA autopilot can keep altitude to within 20' or so in smooth air).
So I was wondering where they get this data from? I find it hard to believe either:
a) AA, UA, BA etc can really fly to an accuracy of 0.5'
b) VS can't fly to an accuracy of 500'
Any illumination welcome...
n5296s
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you expect Flight Levels to be to an exact multiple of thousands of feet then you're in for a big surprise over Russia. They use flights levels in multiples of 300 metres and everybody flies to whichever multiple of 100ft is closest to it. Hence flying around at 36400ft is perfectly normal.
On a related topic what is the position with Latvia, Estonia etc which such flights cross. Is it only Russia which has retained the old Soviet levels or do all the old Soviet satellite countries now part of the EU still continue with it ?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHBM
Most of the former CIS states have converted to feet (Lativa for example). Last time I flew to Kiev (Ukraine) they used feet down to about FL040 then metres for the final approach. I suspect that in a couple of years or so they could well be totally converted.
Having said that, and despite being brought in using imperial units, it is a bit anachronistic is the 21st century with us using a mixture of knots for windspeed, metres for visibility, feet for altitude, and millibars [hectopascals] for pressure.
In this I exclude the US of A, who if nothing else are at least consistent [in being behind the times]!
Most of the former CIS states have converted to feet (Lativa for example). Last time I flew to Kiev (Ukraine) they used feet down to about FL040 then metres for the final approach. I suspect that in a couple of years or so they could well be totally converted.
Having said that, and despite being brought in using imperial units, it is a bit anachronistic is the 21st century with us using a mixture of knots for windspeed, metres for visibility, feet for altitude, and millibars [hectopascals] for pressure.
In this I exclude the US of A, who if nothing else are at least consistent [in being behind the times]!
