Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Lock suitcase or not if state bound?

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Lock suitcase or not if state bound?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Feb 2006, 05:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think that there are any problems with flights originating outside the US, even if they're going to the US. Locks have always been acceptable and indeed recommended by airlines.

It's only for US-originating flights, where the TSA is responsible for screening, that the TSA recommends that you don't lock your bags because they may want to smash their way inside them if you do.
.......It was a flight to the USA originating at Gatwick (CO 5) and terminating in Houston when the TSA destroyed my bag!!!
bealine is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 09:27
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South England
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've not read the rest of the thread apart from the OP so this is probably a repeat but....

LOCK IT!

Going to the States LOCK IT.

Coming from the States, LOCK IT.

You'll find your airline and your travel insurance will take no responisibility if your bag is unlocked and something goes missing.

The worst that'll happen is the TSA will break your lock.

The TSA are a joke. There's no need for the whole leave your bag unlocked cherade.
striparella is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 10:11
  #23 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
The worst that'll happen is the TSA will break your lock.
... and not reseal it properly, which then allows your goods to be removed. Since the case was unlocked, your insurance will not pay. Yes, the TSA is a joke but the irritation is that they can legally expose you to loss without any liability to themselves. I agree that I will lock my case the next time I go to the USA and be prepared to argue for a long time about any loss.

What makes it the more irritating, it that the next major attack on the USA is highly unlikely to be through an airliner. 'Security' and military agencies are always fighting the last war.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 13:33
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Newbury, UK
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bealine
.......It was a flight to the USA originating at Gatwick (CO 5) and terminating in Houston when the TSA destroyed my bag!!!

If it was a direct flight then the TSA have not been near your bag on the US inbound flight. LGW screening; LGW baggage handling: Houston baggage handling and US Customs.

The TSA only inspect outbound baggage - there is liitle point in screening for an in-flight bomb after the flight has landed.

If your flight was indirect, then the TSA staff at eaxh US intermediate stop will have screened the baggage before it was placed onto the next flight.
patdavies is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 17:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shuttlebus and PAXboy make some very sensible comments. Ever since my mandatory military service in a NATO member Air Force I realized that uniformed officials tend to consider their power as a perk of their jobs.

I heard that the TSA agents are the former private security firms employees who were rehired at a higher paying goverment job. I am not sure if this is true but it makes sence. So they do a sloppy jobs and they don't really care if they ruin people's property -because they have a right to do so and they are accountable for any damage.

I feel that in the area of security goverments want to be seen doing something rather that actually do something effective. So if something goes wrong they can claim we took all the necessary measures...


Regarding pre-screaning in the DELTA Airlines terminal in JFK in 1994 both metal detectors and X-Ray machines were located in the entrances.
Rwy in Sight
Rwy in Sight is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 18:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PAXboy
Paper Tiger Uummm, where do you start considering your clothing as having a 'value'? Is it when they take your M&S underwear, or when they take your Saville Row suit? If I place a swatch of 24 CDs in my hold case - so that my hand luggage will not exceed permitted weight - is that placing something of value in the case?
Perhaps I should rephrase that as never check anything you cannot afford to lose. Theft from bags certainly occurs as does the airlines simply losing it for ever. I have no statistics, but suspect either is a relatively low incidence rate. Doesn't help of course if it's yours.

Most household insurance will cover such losses.

But it was this statement of yours which I did not follow
It's not whether someone can open your case, it whether they leave any evidence of having done so that is more important.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 18:44
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TSA cut off our TSA-approved combo lock, by breaking the zip. Didn't get the lock back.

On a Malaysian domestic flight, another zip was broken.

"Security" is currently costing us a suitcase per trip. It's cable ties for me next time. (Only snag is I need a blade in hand luggage to get it open at the far end)
malanda is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 20:22
  #28 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Paper Tiger
But it was this statement of yours which I did not follow
The quote that you refer to "... whether they leave any evidence of having done so that is more important." was made by Final 3 Greens as the #10 post in the thread.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 20:29
  #29 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
.... and my point is that if anyone has interfered with your luggage, it is far better to be aware of this as soon as retrieving the bag off the carousel.

If one is aware that the bag has bee tampered with then it can be reported to the authorities immediately, for example before clearing customs.
 
Old 6th Feb 2006, 10:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bealine
.......It was a flight to the USA originating at Gatwick (CO 5) and terminating in Houston when the TSA destroyed my bag!!!


If it was a direct flight then the TSA have not been near your bag on the US inbound flight. LGW screening; LGW baggage handling: Houston baggage handling and US Customs.

The TSA only inspect outbound baggage - there is liitle point in screening for an in-flight bomb after the flight has landed.

If your flight was indirect, then the TSA staff at eaxh US intermediate stop will have screened the baggage before it was placed onto the next flight.
I can only restate that the lock was cut, at Houston on an arriving Continental flight from London, by the TSA - this is why a TSA headed letter was placed on top of my clothes explaining that my case had been opened!

Nothing was missing - just irreparable, unclaimable damage to a bl00dy good suitcase!!!
bealine is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 12:48
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They've got it right at PVG... Bags xrayed on the belt as the bag leaves the check in desk, and the operators ARE awake... 75% of the time I get called to the security room at the end of the row and have to prove my pantomine bomb shaped Hugo Boss is really aftershave and not something more sinister.
PVGSLF is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 15:09
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buy a combination locking-strap (such as Samsonite) and lock the strap only. If a TSA agent has to open the bag/suitcase, it will be opened with a master key kept by TSA. This works for me as a frequent visitor to the USA, and your bag/suitcase should remain undamaged.
skiesfull is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 20:28
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South England
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by malanda
The TSA cut off our TSA-approved combo lock, by breaking the zip. Didn't get the lock back.
This is another example of the stupidity of the TSA.

To get into a zip bag, you don't need to break the lock.

All you need is a pen nib through the teeth and you're away.
striparella is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2006, 09:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Back of beyond
Posts: 793
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Don't want to polish FRA's halo, but all Economy checked luggage is x-rayed in a sterile area prior to check-in, with LOTS of bags being opened and physically examined.

Now, if only they'd extend that to First and Business.....
RevMan2 is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2006, 12:29
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is it every other country in the world seems able to organize their security without this hassle yet the good ole US of A (who, don't forget, only discovered airport security a little over 4 years ago) are now literally taking a sledgehammer to crack a walnut?!

America does so many things so very well, but when they get it wrong they get it totally f&%Ģing wrong!
Strepsils is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 06:38
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Back of beyond
Posts: 793
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
It's the histrionics that get me!

Flew out of LAX to BOS recently and - due to the one-way ticket - was classified as a security risk by check-in. (Executive management, been with the organisation for 40 years, but hey, I fit the potential terrorist profile)
Well, what a hullaballoo. I thought the first guy who saw the SSS on the boarding pass was going to hyperventilate - started bellowing cryptic commands to all and sundry, who came rushing (I mean RUSHING) to prevent disaster by separating me from bags and sundry items of clothing. I'm not kidding - 6 or so people were involved.

Probably went home and told the admiring family that they saved America from the threat of terrorism. Or nucular attack. What do I know.

(Out of BOS wasn't much better - Marine drill sergeant wannabe bellowing convoluted instructions to each and every passenger. How about guidelines in pictogram form?) Jeez.
RevMan2 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 09:02
  #37 (permalink)  

Lady Lexxington
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Manor House
Age: 43
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Revman2, LAX is appalling for hysterical security staff. Mr Lexx and I were SSS'd due to my being airline staff (huge risk you see) and told to go stand in the naughty queue. I started asking other people who had been sent there if they were staff, etc Turned out that nearly every person in that queue was either current or retired airline staff on nonrevs. The only one who wasn't was a gentleman in his 50/60s who had purchased his ticket through a travel agent and paid cash, his wife had gone through normal security.

I have no problem being put through additional security, what I do have a problem with is being used to make up numbers*, whilst security potentially miss real threats because they are too busy being rude to SSS pax and causing us to miss flights due to the 40minute wait they put you through before they will deal with you. The staff who have been, apparentely, trained to ignore you when you mention that your flight will be departing soon, are the rudest and most heavy handed I have ever had the misfortune to come across. If I could avoid LAX forever I would, however I have a very good friend who lives there.

* I have asked the TSA at several other US airports and they confirmed that airline staff on duty or pleasure are used to make up the numbers they need to secondary screen.

I find the TSA to be rude, surly and totally out of touch with what it a risk and what isn't. Not impressed.
lexxity is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 11:12
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Newbury, UK
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of interest, what happens to a pax who has checked in in good time, goes straight to security but us delayed by extra screening and therefore miss your flight.

Two points, once through security, the PAX is effectively in no man's land ie airside, but with no flight to go to. Secondly, how does such a PAX actually get hold of their off;loaded baggage and then eventually get to their destination. I can't see many economy holiday PAX having sufficent funds available to purchase a further ticket.
patdavies is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 15:56
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lexxity
If I could avoid LAX forever I would, however I have a very good friend who lives there.
Try LGB; less service but almost (almost !) a pleasure flying in and out of there. SNA is OK TSA-wise but a bit far. Wouldn't recommend BUR though, the goons there are just as bad.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2006, 16:04
  #40 (permalink)  

Lady Lexxington
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Manor House
Age: 43
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pat I have no idea what would happen to a normal pax if they missed a flight due to the pillocks who the TSA employ, luckily when you are nonrev you just go on the next available. Luckily LAX-ORD is a very well served route.
lexxity is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.