Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

7 trolley dollies, one packet of crisps!

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

7 trolley dollies, one packet of crisps!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th December 2005 | 08:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
7 trolley dollies, one packet of crisps!

I've just flown BA Eurotraveller for the first time in a while. LHR-GVA and return. A321. I was gobsmacked to find that it needed 7 cabin crew to serve a packet of crisps and a drink (very nice crisps mind, well done Burts). When I asked, "is that it", I was told that if I travelled earlier in the day I'd have got a butty for breakfast!
I'm sure you are on to it Willie but you could save a shedload on CC if you're not going to give a proper service. By the way, why not try giving a service so you keep the distinction between you and low cost - just an idea!
Docfly is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 08:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: HKG
I've just flown British Midland LHR-CDG. It was pretty uncomfortable and the drinks/sandwich very expensive and very slow, I got mine served at top of descent. I'll fly BA next time, very little difference in cost.
BusyB is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 09:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: The Sunny South
I had a similar experience in the middle of the month returning BA from Basel. To be fair, the CSD and the team did also hand out a nice minature bottle of wine with the packet of salty greasy crisps. On a LoCo, at least I would have had the option of buying a sandwich but there would not be a CSD to oversee the exquisite culinary feast

BA are milking the Gate Gourmet situation, are avoiding picking up food downroute and are laughing all the way to the bank.
Volmet South is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 09:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: London
This I think is the problem the mainline carriers face.

They don't want to look like a loco but they're happy to have a loco standard of service.

At least with a loco you know what you're going to get. Nothing for free but a service where you can buy food if you're hungry.

On mainline if you miss the chance to eat and are hoping to get something on the plane you can be severely disappointed as there is no trolley to buy from.....
Rick Binson is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 09:36
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Yes Volmet, but what fooled me was that BA's website said that full catering and bar service was back on all flights from LHR. Full catering was one small packet of crisps and no provision to buy anything else.
Minimum cabin crew for the 321 is probably 3 or 4 (Idon't know how many seats BA have) so they have the opportunity to save at least 3 CC on these short flights.
I'd rather have nothing and know what the situation is than be insulted with what I did get.
Docfly is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 10:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: UK
BA are milking the Gate Gourmet situation, are avoiding picking up food downroute and are laughing all the way to the bank
BA haven't picked up food downroute for about two years. I guess you haven't flown with them much recently.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 10:01
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 34
From: London,England
Min. legal cabin crew on a A321 is 5 which is what we use now at bmi on flights with no biz. class section, in which case 6. Used to be 8 when we first got them and been whittled down ever since.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 10:37
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
So far as I know, the main reason for having cabin crew there is to provide safety briefings and to assist you in the event of a problem or emergency - in between the (hopefully extremely large) interval between problems and emergencies, the airline often keeps them occupied by serving you food and drink.

If the airline doesn't give them very much food and drink to serve you, it doesn't actually negate their reason for being there.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 10:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: by the river
Its only time and motion chaps

Would have thought this would be a great opportunity for the Gourmet Sandwich companies like Prêt-à-Manger to step up to the tarmac and do a deal with you picking something from a rack as you board (Lufthansa style) - that way you get what you want, and can reduce the CC's to a safety minimum.

But why would airlines wake up - get a think-tank panel of a few long suffering PAX and get it right.

gofer is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 10:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: The Sunny South
BA haven't picked up food downroute for about two years.
That is not the point Carnage, following the failure of BA to manage their catering supplier, they have intentionally made no effort to resolve the situation by picking up catering down-route. The BA brand is being damaged however the bean-counters are happy. What's the difference between Fly.BE and Fly.BA on shorthaul other than a free small bottle of wine and a packet of crisps

.I do fly BA regularly (6 times in the last two months including 2 x 12 hr sectors and will do twice more before the end of the year) however I am often forced to use other carriers where BA choose not to offer any competition but that's another thread altogether
Volmet South is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 11:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 1
From: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
>So far as I know, the main reason for having cabin crew there is to provide safety briefings and to assist you in the event of a problem or emergency - in between the (hopefully extremely large) interval between problems and emergencies, the airline often keeps them occupied by serving you food and drink.

So if the CC are underoccupied, why don't they provide some SERVICE to passengers instead of hiding, chatting in the kitchens?
They could offer head (massage) or sit on my knee and tell me a story to calm my flying nerves. They could even put on a panty-mime (in place of those boring games of charades that precede the flight). I'm sure their talent needn't be wasted.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 11:43
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: England.
Oh-h-h-h-h......no-o-o-o-o......i-i-i-i-i-it......wo-o-o-o-ouldn't.

acbus1 is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 11:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: UK
following the failure of BA to manage their catering supplier, they have intentionally made no effort to resolve the situation by picking up catering down-route
BA moved away from catering downroute two years ago and have no plans to return to it. In order to cater effectively from abroad they'd need long term contracts for each outstation and they would rather not have any catering than pay to reverse the decision. What exactly is it that your complaining about? That BA can't solve their catering problem? That your bag of crisps wasn't loaded abroad? Or that you don't like the fact you only got a bag of crisps? If its the latter as I suspect then it has nothing to do with Gate Gourmet and everything to do with them deciding to downgrade the catering product on offer at that time of day. Next time you fly fill out a GPM and let the beancounters know what you think.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 11:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: sussex
unbelievable! Can't believe the tosh i've just read.
heebeegb is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 13:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
So far as I know, the main reason for having cabin crew there is to provide safety briefings and to assist you in the event of a problem or emergency
NUTS
Rananim is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 13:47
  #16 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 142
From: Under the clouds now
Nuts are orf dear!
brakedwell is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 14:02
  #17 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,395
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
7 cabin crew on a 321 seems excessive, surely? Perhaps some were positioning for other flights?

Since April 2004, Lufthansa has also cut back on cabin service. They now only carry the legal minimum cabin crew on European flights; their cabin crew are frankly embarrassed at the low standards they are now obliged to provide even in Business Class. And yes, nuts are now also orff....

Despite thousands of complaints and the rise in popularity of their lo-co competitors, European mainline airlines seem hell-bent on their downward slide in service standards.

Is this a rumour? No. Is it news? Perhaps because unless airline bean counters wake up to customer dissatisfaction, mainline pilot careers will ultimately be in jeopardy as the lo-co airlines offer similar service but at a fraction of the cost.
BEagle is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 14:16
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: UK
I thought BA's in-flight meals service was back to normal. Am I mistaken?
Jake Russell is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 14:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: UK
7 crew on a 321 seems a bit light for BA, we used to have 6 on a 319 to CDG! I bet they use 8 if they send the big bus to Paris!
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 28th December 2005 | 15:05
  #20 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
I cannot understand why people would want to eat airline food anyway. LHR-GVA...can we not go without food for that long now?
Gonzo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.