Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

United's transatlantic services

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

United's transatlantic services

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Dec 2004, 18:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United's transatlantic services

Hey, I am travelling with United Airlines in January LHR-JFK return. What is their in-flight service like? Can anyone recommend which seats to avoid/try and get in terms of legroom/comfort etc. I am travelling out on a B767 and returning on a B777.

Any tips on how to get an upgrade?!?
phil_2405 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 19:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: He's on the limb to nowhere
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In flight service down the back nothing special, no significant difference between any other transatlantic carrier. Some days it's better than XX, sometimes worse. Have mixture of US and UK flight attendants so will get unpredictable cultural differences in service. Booze is free.

Where United are slightly better that the competion is their Economy Plus section which has maybe 8-10 rows over the wing section of the economy cabin. If you don't have 'status' you might get lucky and be put in those seats when you check in, they have an extra 6" approx of leg room and are good compared to the seats behind. Depends on the load really, the fuller the plane the better chance you have. If it's empty they will block seats out for their frequent fliers to have an empty seat next to them.

Ugrade to bus class without status is pretty unlikely, UA use their business cabin to reward their frequent fliers and without an upgrade certificate or status you will have a lot of others in front of you. Might get lucky of course, op-upgrades can come out of the blue for non-status pax, even on BA!
slim_slag is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 19:53
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our flights have now changed to a B777 both ways, fine by me!
phil_2405 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 12:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my favourite seat on UA's B777: 21H - it's on the aisle at the front of the r/h side of E+, immediately before the crew rest area. lots of leg room and your own adjustable vid screen. ace!

failing that, 30A or 30H (the aisle exit row seats at the front of the main economy cabin) - again, bags of leg room (far more than you could want!) and your own screen. but these are next to the loos, so you can find a small (cross-legged!) gaggle of people in front of you getting tangled in your feet. but very handy for that quick dash before the seat-belt sign goes on for landing
exit.row.junkie is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 17:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: west of the Tamar
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I had a number of transatlantic flights on UA 777's and 767's between 1998 - 2003, all in the back apart from one upgrade to Business Class due to my original flight being cancelled.

I must say, I couldn't fault any aspect of their service, either at check-in or in the air. In flight meals in both classes were excellent, significantly better than BA. On a Washington - Mexico City flight we got excellent Mexican food in more quantity then even I could eat, in economy class.

Regarding UA vs AA, UA win hands down for me on virtually every aspect. Some of the worst airline food I have ever suffered was served on AA. I ask you, a Cheeseburger masquerading as a meal on LHR - LAX!!
kala87 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2004, 11:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have to say i think UA's catering has gone down in the last few years, though in the current climate that shouldn't be a huge surprise. but the second serving lhr->jfk in economy is poor: a ham+cheese roll, a bag of crisps (chips) and a chocolate bar. fat, salt and sugar in abundance, but nary a vitamin in sight, and you can whistle for fibre

but having said that, the english tea serving in biz class on the same route is peachy!
exit.row.junkie is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2005, 20:51
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was fairly happy with United's inflight service in Economy...nothing to shout about particularly but it did the job!!

Only 2 problems:

1. On the return flight, we had to pay for alcoholic drinks (we didn't on the outward flight). Apparently the policy changed while we were away.

2. On both flights they were unable to show all the advertised movies for unknown reasons!! Esp annoying on the inbound flight because I had been looking forward to watching one film in particular!

On the whole though, good job United
phil_2405 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.