Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

BA .v. GB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th March 2004 | 23:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: N/A
BA .v. GB

I'm off to MPL with BA soon but the flight is operated by GB Airways. I know that they offer the 'mainline' BA product (Deli Bag (or whatever it is called this month), interiors etc.) but will there be any noticable difference between them and 'proper' BA?
Wannabe Flyboy is offline  
Old 7th March 2004 | 00:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: UK
No none that you will notice. As I understand it under the terms of the Franchise the service etc has to be the same.

I use GB/BA regularly to AGP and they are excellent.
Angus Meecoat is offline  
Old 7th March 2004 | 02:28
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: N/A
Yeah that's what I thought... different company (a la CitiExpress) but same service. I've never had a bad experience with BA - only a 30 minute delay at LHR due to French ATC striking...!
Wannabe Flyboy is offline  
Old 7th March 2004 | 03:31
  #4 (permalink)  

Pilot of the Airwaves
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Close to the Med
Angus,

From what you say, GB must be in breach of their franchise agreement, as their service is far better than that from BA.

The AGP service is brilliant, shame they have to use Heathrow Terminal 1, which takes some of the gloss off.
IB4138 is offline  
Old 7th March 2004 | 14:09
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 9
From: BHX LXR ASW
IB4138 - you seem to have a grudge against BA. All you do is knock the airline (other forums) Whats your problem???

BA's service and product is still as good as ever. I have never had a bad flight on any flights. Always on time, service has been excellent in all classes.

GB's service is also good and very professional along with smart clean Airbuses. I don't think there is much difference in the service styles, which after all is the object of the product.

Yes I agree terminal 1 is a bit of a hell hole but thats down to the BAA. Lets hope lessons have been learnt when they build Terminal 5.
crewmeal is offline  
Old 7th March 2004 | 16:51
  #6 (permalink)  

Pilot of the Airwaves
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Close to the Med
Crewmeal

I speak as I find.
Perhaps I have been unfortunate with my recent BA experiences, including replies to complaints I have made to senior management.
I say experiences, as you have given Swiss the thumbs down based on one round trip (Swiss v Turkish thread).

BA's new A320/319s are superb to fly on.
After flying around Europe and beyond for over 40 years I am in a position to comment. I have flown on a lot worse airlines than BA in this time.
Regretably the present BA product is not to the standard it use to be. I always used to book on BA when I could.
bmi are also out of favour with me at present, as are easyJet's handling agents at Gatwick..its not just BA.

However I have no complaints about Swiss, as you obviously do.
Each to their own and we can only pass on our experiences.
If you try hard enough you can find a fault anywhere. Unfortunately I have not had to try with BA of late.


Now when it comes to BAA...I could write a book!

Last edited by IB4138; 7th March 2004 at 17:35.
IB4138 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.