Re previous post . The President laid on a flight for all the striking pilots to return to Nauru from Melbourne to negotiate new terms but this was refused on the advice of the then AFAP. Pity because the problem could have been solved to the satisfaction on both sides.
|
Good to see you back Centaurus, I was thinking its been so long a charge of AWOL should be considered. ;)
|
Hear, hear.
|
"In 1988, a strike by Air Nauru pilots for better pay and safety conditions took place" - from your book.
"I was one of the non-strikers and never regretted it." And if the pilots on strike had returned to Nauru "the problem could have been solved to the satisfaction on both sides" Is it then the case that you'd have benefited from the improved pay and conditions without having supported those trying to better things? "I left for a better job a few months later" Why? |
Originally Posted by Centaurus
(Post 11365943)
Re previous post . The President laid on a flight for all the striking pilots to return to Nauru from Melbourne to negotiate new terms but this was refused on the advice of the then AFAP. Pity because the problem could have been solved to the satisfaction on both sides.
And the AFAP involvement you mention is pure fantasy. The AFAP did not dictate, direct or involve themselves in any shape or form except tp provide the use of their offices, moral support and secretarial facilities as they would do for any IFALPA member. The NAPA were grateful to the AFAP but never allowed them to run the dispute. |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 11367868)
Why couldn't new terms be negotiated while the pilots were in Melbourne, they tried for four weeks. Anyway, as you well know, the strike was not about "new terms" or even the appalling safety issues in the airline at that stage. And the AFAP involvement you mention is pure fantasy. The AFAP did not dictate, direct or involve themselves in any shape or form except tp provide the use of their offices, moral support and secretarial facilities as they would do for any IFALPA member. The NAPA were grateful to the AFAP but never allowed them to run the dispute.
|
If they are advertising, why don't you apply, have an interview and find out directly?
Or, at least ring HR etc and ask directly about the T&C's but make sure you get the name right :ok: You don't seem to be getting far here. |
Was anyone hired post the recent advert and interviews
|
Originally Posted by frozen59
(Post 11379037)
Was anyone hired post the recent advert and interviews
|
yep, I know of a few. |
Originally Posted by zanzibar
(Post 11379631)
So, are the T's and C's to your liking?
|
Originally Posted by HappyBandit
(Post 11379765)
not sure why you're being condescending.
You’ve been chasing information and now you claim to know of a few that have been employed there. I’m guessing Zanzibar was suggesting you’d have asked them. |
Goodness me, I ask a straightforward question and I’m accused of being condescending. Wtiwiw has understood my intent.
I had to look it up to see if it was even remotely appropriate: condescending adjective having or showing an attitude of patronising superiority. Can’t see how that fits. Sensodyne might help. |
Originally Posted by HappyBandit
(Post 11379511)
yep, I know of a few.
like if training has started etc, how many have been hired, asking for a friend |
Originally Posted by zanzibar
(Post 11380173)
Goodness me, I ask a straightforward question and I’m accused of being condescending. Wtiwiw has understood my intent. I had to look it up to see if it was even remotely appropriate: condescendingadjectivehaving or showing an attitude of patronising superiority. Can’t see how that fits. Sensodyne might help.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.