Running out of rego’s
So apparently there are well less than 100 GA rego combinations left, reducing at a rate of over 10 per week.
What happens next??? |
Start using VI prefix, I assume?
|
The Civil Aircraft Register currently shows 16003 entries. May or not be up-to-date, after all it is CAsA.
Showing 1 - 30 of 16003 results. Total number of unique combinations of three letter combinations. 26 x 26 x 26 = 17576. = 1573 available registrations? 17576 divided by 10 per week = 157 weeks = 3 years. |
Not really an issue:
B- xxxx will solve the problem! |
Originally Posted by Two_dogs
(Post 11188089)
The Civil Aircraft Register currently shows 16003 entries. May or not be up-to-date, after all it is CAsA.
Showing 1 - 30 of 16003 results. Total number of unique combinations of three letter combinations. 26 x 26 x 26 = 17576. = 1573 available registrations? 17576 divided by 10 per week = 157 weeks = 3 years. |
Australia has the VI- prefix too? Perhaps the CAsA KingAir or whatever they get around in these days could have VI-RUS? Maybe Glen B could grab VI-CTM...
63 available marks you can reserve as of this morning. 17,576 - (16,003 + 63) = 1,510 marks currently "unavailable" for whatever reason, probably already reserved. At least we don't have the scenario they do in the US where some parasite bulk-reserves groups of short N numbers and tries to flog them back to owners at exorbitant rates... |
Why not reuse registration codes?
|
We do reuse them...
|
Originally Posted by oceancrosser
(Post 11188492)
Why not reuse registration codes?
That being said, it would only delay the inevitable as we would run out anyway. |
I vaguely recall a proposal some years ago (maybe mid-90's) to change the Australian prefix from VH- to V-.
The Canadians did this 40-odd years ago, and changed from CF- to C-, thus freeing up thousands of new possibilities. As I see it, starting a VI- prefix would only cause confusion; what if VH-ABC and VI-ABC are on the same frequency at the same time? |
More than likely VM- , this was previously allocated to Australian government aircraft in the 50's-60's, Caribous, Hercs etc. They may not have actually been painted on but they certainly were allocated.
|
“V” won’t help if you’re still using ABC as the callsign.
To avoid all confusion it will have to have a number in it. Making it 4 letters won’t help either as if you miss one, you’ll be confused with a 3 letter callsign. I’m keen to hear the solution for this! Most likely VH-3AD if it has to remain as 3 characters. |
That'd give an extra 6,760 available marks just by going to a letter or number / letter / letter combination..
|
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
(Post 11188525)
“V” won’t help if you’re still using ABC as the callsign.
To avoid all confusion it will have to have a number in it. Making it 4 letters won’t help either as if you miss one, you’ll be confused with a 3 letter callsign. I’m keen to hear the solution for this! Most likely VH-3AD if it has to remain as 3 characters. |
I doubt, very much, that ATC/Centre will wonder whether Cessna 172 Two Golf Bravo 5,500' ASST calling on 124.1mHz is actually a Sydney radio station broadcasting on 873kHz.
|
Get that part, but on the paperwork/legal side of things it will be interesting to see how it would play out
|
Though when 2RN is a VFR reporting point for a major Class D, there might be a problem with a couple of specific callsigns...
|
Lots of software will need to be updated.
|
Sit tight, I've sent the question to CASA Aircraft Registrar. I'm curious about it too.
Would not surprise me if I get back "we're looking into that now." ("now" might be too late!) I did search ICAO info a while ago, found nothing useful about future allocations/series. |
Originally Posted by KRviator
(Post 11188538)
Though when 2RN is a VFR reporting point for a major Class D, there might be a problem with a couple of specific callsigns...
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.