That doesn't happen. However, CASA knew that the type was used for incipient spin training per their Part 61 requirements yet was not approved for intentional spins and did nought about it.

Not really, the requirement is for the test pilot to be able to prevent the wing drop exceeding specified amounts - that is test pilot, not just an instructor let alone a student pilot.

Seems a perculiarly written go-around procedure. Is that a manufacturer's POH or a flying school document? Extending flap in a go-around is most odd. Similarly all this advice about trimming doesn't sound like a manufacturer's language as trimming should be normal airmanship? Also use of 150 ft seems a bit dodgy when most height restrictions are in whole numbers e.g. 200 feet. As for "Repeat circuit pattern and landing" what a strange addition to a go-around procedure that is?

What is the specified limit of amount of wing drop (if any) at the point of stall for LSA certification requirements? Non LSA types? it shouldn't be a case of how cunning a test pilot is to prevent a wing drop. Either an aeroplane drops a wing at point of stall or it doesn't.

Is this at idle power? if not, how much power has to be used to meet certification requirements? Seems to me a grey area when it comes to LSA certification as against non LSA types.

David J Pilkington is online now Report Post

Quite a few configurations and flight states to consider, for example
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....1ff8406be1.png
Of course there was that error in the crew moment arms back then so the actual CG was further aft than determined by the POH.

Not a grey area at all as it seems to me that the requirements are quite clear.

Feel free.

Copy pasted direct from the POH.

Got a good theory instructor (Kris K) who not only was a wealth of knowledge, but straightened me out to get my priorities right. Also finished at a time when the big glut of students passed, we all got along and were determined to finish. Also finished bang on my allotted hours, so wasn’t forced to pay overs like a lot of students.

FAA AC 23-8C, the FAR 23 Flight Test Guide is also a good read.

Be interesting to see if these findings play a role in the class action.

What's the latest rumour in regards to the Class Action against BHI/Soar? everything's gone really quiet on that front, did the mediation in March go ahead?

Foxbat bashing has been soarly missed.

Centaurus, I like everything you say. In my experience a go around from the flare or a bounce usually needs considerable forward stick force as power is applied and airspeed is regained. Quickly followed by adjustment of trim and flap. I doubt this is ever taught.

This does make some sense to me as being a little more prescriptive for novice pilots. Everywhere I've worked at has had bounce and balloon recovery as part of its syllabus pre-solo. One operator had a strict go-around on bounce/balloon policy, due to the threat of tail strike or prop strike from students trying a second attempt on landing. The same operator also had the students recite a go-around procedure of "Going around, full power, right rudder" as the aircraft had a nasty yaw at low speed,full power application (high power, short tail). Reminding pilots to trim, is a constant thing instructors do, this still happens well into some pilots careers. Pretty sure some airline sim instructors have had to remind some quite high time pilots to trim during approaches and go-rounds, I've heard it in many a debrief.

I once witnessed a student conduct 4 go-rounds during a first solo and then land perfectly, he just didn't feel happy with the first few attempts. I had a student on second solo once have crosswind increase slightly above his comfort level, so he went around, and requested the crossing runway to land. It might be assumed a pilot has airmanship, but if an aircraft has a sneaky bite to it, why not include it in the procedure. The wing flaps extend part is the more peculiar statement, but I don't know this type.

The additive "Repeat circuit pattern and landing" says to me, don't attempt to save the landing, just do another circuit. I was never a fan of teaching students to catch balloons/bounces and try to land extending landing distance and increasing the chances of mishaps. Go-round should be part of a solo check as much as each landing is.

Going from A320 to B787, had to learn how to use Pitch trim all over again😂😂