No Drone Zones
I've been fielding questions from family over the last 2 days after the news of the events at Gatwick regarding no fly zones for drones.
Considering that 50% of houses in Sydney are located in a no drone zone, either near the harbour or Sydney airport. Is a kid flying his drone in the front yard at below treetop height an offense? My take of the regulations is flying a drone even 1cm above the ground if you are in a no fly zone could get you into hot water. I called CASA, they said they don't know, and someone will call me back. No one ever called. The local cops believe no fly means, no fly at any altitude, even 1m above the ground, but are not 100% sure. One said he would confiscate any drone until the law is clarified. |
If your drone weighs more than 100g, you must keep at least 5.5km away from controlled aerodromes. Flying within 5.5km of a non-controlled aerodrome or helicopter landing site (HLS) is possible,but only if no manned aircraft are operating to or from the aerodrome. If you become aware of manned aircraft operating to or from the aerodrome/HLS, you must manoeuvre away from the aircraft and land as soon as safely possible.
You must not fly your drone higher than 120 metres (400ft) above the ground. You must keep your drone at least 30 metres away from other people. Link from CAsA website to this. https://droneflyer.gov.au/ What is the dimensions of the front yard? |
The size of the front yard is irrelevant to the question. But to appease the pedantic, lets take my cousins front yard at San Siouci, on the foreshore of Botany Bay and right next to Sydney airport. The front yard measures 17m wide by 9 m deep. There are two 15m tall oak tress in the front yard. On Christmas morning when the kids get their 1kg drones and fly them in the front yard at a hight of 2-3m, if a council ranger, police car or CASA vehicle drive past, will they be charged with an offense.
If you live within 5.5 km of an airport, can you fly a drone "not above 120m".........or not at all. |
If your drone is under 100 grams you can fly it up to 120 meters high with or without oak trees (trees are not part of the law) within 5.5km of the controlled airport.
But yours is 1,000 grams - so in your location you will be breaking the law should you fly it. Council Ranger or CAsA on a Christmas morning would be like winning lotto. So to answer your question it totally depends on the weight. You can and I know was recently done - fly a sub 100 gram drone, inside an open hanger at a busy International Airport. |
On Christmas morning when the kids get their 1kg drones and fly them in the front yard at a hight of 2-3m, if a council ranger, police car or CASA vehicle drive past, will they be charged with an offense. Probably technically illegal. Like drinking wine on the beach. Would you be at any risk of prosecution? Probably not. |
My uncle in law lives in suburban Melbourne and he has resorted to a fishing sinker setup with fishing line to throw at one that hovers over his yard occasionally. It’s not uncommon for them to be flying over your head on the beach. Not really what you want as they definitely go pear shaped occasionally. |
if a council ranger, police car or CASA vehicle drive past, Police, possibly, the location being so close to the airport and particularly if a near neighbour is annoyed/busybody enough and/or aware of the Gatwick business decides to dob you in. As the link provided above says, quoted again: If your drone weighs more than 100g, you must keep at least 5.5km away from controlled aerodromes. |
And to be pedantic, 5.5 km from WHERE in the controlled aerodrome?
Is that 5.5.km from any point on the perimeter fence? From the control tower? End of the runway(s)? There is nothing like a poorly defined (or explained) rule to attract those who like to test the definition. |
Originally Posted by WingNut60
(Post 10342638)
And to be pedantic, 5.5 km from WHERE in the controlled aerodrome?
Is that 5.5.km from any point on the perimeter fence? From the control tower? End of the runway(s)? There is nothing like a poorly defined (or explained) rule to attract those who like to test the definition. http://www.casa.gov.au/aircraft/stan...one-safety-app http://casa.dronecomplier.com/external# FWIW some councils/shires prohibit operations at parks and public areas. https://www.smh.com.au/technology/dr...07-p4yzjz.html |
Originally Posted by WingNut60
(Post 10342638)
And to be pedantic, 5.5 km from WHERE in the controlled aerodrome?
Is that 5.5.km from any point on the perimeter fence? From the control tower? End of the runway(s)? There is nothing like a poorly defined (or explained) rule to attract those who like to test the definition. |
Answer is no you can't. Get the CASA Can I Fly There App, it's free.
|
In NZ they have a shielded operation exemption, you can fly in your front yard ok. Makes sense as any aircraft you might crash into shouldn't really be below the tree or mast near you.
What are the rules for flying shielded?A shielded operation must meet the below requirements:
|
I don't get the "only below 400ft" mantra and the 3mn from airports since CASR101 only aeems to be regulating things above 400ft as far as I read them. Can anyone quote me chapter and verse of the regulations or instruments that prohibit unmanned aircraft of any description (and model aircraft in particular) from flight above 400AGL and within 3nm of an airport?
|
Originally Posted by Andy_RR
(Post 10342842)
I don't get the "only below 400ft" mantra and the 3mn from airports since CASR101 only aeems to be regulating things above 400ft as far as I read them. Can anyone quote me chapter and verse of the regulations or instruments that prohibit unmanned aircraft of any description (and model aircraft in particular) from flight above 400AGL and within 3nm of an airport?
If you fail to understand that, then there is no hope. |
101.075 Operation near aerodromes
(1) A person may operate an unmanned aircraft at an altitude above 400 feet AGL within 3 nautical miles of an aerodrome only if: (a) the operation is permitted by another provision of this Part; or (b) permission has been given for the operation under regulation 101.080. Penalty: 25 penalty units. (2) A person may operate an unmanned aircraft over an area mentioned in paragraph (3)(a) or (b) only if: (a) the operation is permitted by another provision of this Part; or (b) permission has been given for the operation under regulation 101.080. Penalty: 25 penalty units. (3) The areas for subregulation (2) are: (a) a movement area or runway of an aerodrome; and (b) the approach or departure path of a runway of an aerodrome. (4) A person must not operate an unmanned aircraft in such a manner as to create an obstruction to an aircraft taking off from, or approaching for landing at, a landing area or a runway of an aerodrome. 101.085 Maximum operating height (1) A person may operate an unmanned aircraft above 400 feet AGL only: (a) in an area approved under regulation 101.030 as an area for the operation of unmanned aircraft of the same class as the aircraft concerned, and in accordance with any conditions of the approval; or (b) as otherwise permitted by this Part. |
Its an interesting discussion, if there's debate here among people in the aviation industry imagine what the general public must think?
At the end of the day drones are simply not controllable from the authorities POV. Oh there are regulations in place for sure as they need to be but we also have road rules, who obeys them all? NO ONE on the planet! As soon as mankind invents something it gets abused, all the rules under the sun mean zip, fact of life! |
If one starts annoying me at my place, out comes the shotgun. I have a right to privacy and quiet enjoyment of my property. |
imagine what the general public must think? If one starts annoying me at my place, out comes the shotgun. |
What does a 100g drone look like? Sounds like a good christmas present considering its man christmas shopping day!
|
Part of the problem is that the general public can purchase a drone from a retail store and are not made aware (In most cases) that there are rules governing the use of them. If the government advertised the fact that there are rules governing drones, maybe the message would get out a bit better. Commercial television advertises plenty of educational information relating to road safety which appears to have a positive effect particularly for the honest people.
|
Very true.
I just did some quick googling and of the three Australian companies I looked at, only one mentioned the regulatory requirements and even then it was their own text somewhat incomplete and didn't provide links to the app or CASA pages. I guess putting that sort of thing up might discourage sales. |
Last year JB Hifi at Southland had a good but handwritten notice warning about flying drones near airports and some council parks. I might have missed it but its not there this year and I’m not braving christmas eve shopping hell to find out. |
This has been provided to retailers in the past: file:///C:/Users/Kim/Downloads/rpa_brochure_recreational_dl_150dpi.pdf
|
Originally Posted by Sunfish
(Post 10343284)
If one starts annoying me at my place, out comes the shotgun. I have a right to privacy and quiet enjoyment of my property. |
The Australian 24 December 2018: New regulations for drone activity https://outline.com/kgqydy> |
nobody is talking about shooting at polair. The regs say no drones within 30 metres of people. So anyone doing so is breaking the law and by inference creating a safety hazard. Coincidentally that is about shotgun range. Removing the drone with a shotgun is therefore removing a safety hazard and preventing the commission of any further offence. A less drastic solution assuming line of sight flying at my place is video of the drone followed by video of the operator and vehicle plus a call to 000. We live in what is termed a holiday destination and we get a lot of “CUBS” - cashed up bogans with their toys, so a drone incursion is not improbable. We regularly call the police over illegal deer hunting, spotlight shooters, drunken speedsters,unregistered trail bikes etc. as do the neighbors. The police are most attentive at this time of year as we try and prevent them incinerating the neighbourhood, vandalising the infrastructure or killing each other in any number of ways such as throwing butane cartridges into a fire. |
Y shaped thingys with rubber bands and ball shaped mint lollies do a marvelous job as well as tasting nice.
CC |
You may be somewhat misguided Mr Sunfish, but do tell me please, is flying a drone illegally an indictable offence and does your usage of the shotgun fit with your understanding of section 462A of the Victorian Crimes act 1958? CRIMES ACT 1958 - SECT 462AUse of force to prevent the commission of an indictable offenceA person may use such force not disproportionate to the objective as he believes on reasonable grounds to be necessary to prevent the commission, continuance or completion of an indictable offence or to effect or assist in effecting the lawful arrest of a person committing or suspected of committing any offence. |
I know Sqwawk, but this is Pprune:8 |
Often as one takes a lunch break at Southbank one sees a drone tootling around over the Brisbane CBD.
I wonder who and why? Maybe it's rules for some and open slather for others! CC |
Originally Posted by Sunfish
(Post 10343284)
If one starts annoying me at my place, out comes the shotgun. I have a right to privacy and quiet enjoyment of my property. |
Originally Posted by Checklist Charlie
(Post 10343391)
Y shaped thingys with rubber bands and ball shaped mint lollies do a marvelous job as well as tasting nice.
CC As an aside, they are illegal too in in many states. Although some states permit home made ones. I bought my kids one each in Bolivia (same ones the herders use to control their flocks on steep ground) as souvenirs. I’m not sure how customs would view it - depending on which state we entered or lived? |
https://outdoorswarehouse.com.au/wea...d-regulations/
Yet I saw these in a shop the other day, here in Australia. https://www.globalgear.com.au/armoury/replica-guns.html http://www.jasperco.com.au/ |
I'm with Sunfish here.:ok:
Besides; "Prove it was me what shot it down Officer/Yer Honour/whoever...!":}:E |
Originally Posted by Pinky the pilot
(Post 10343593)
I'm with Sunfish here.:ok:
Besides; "Prove it was me what shot it down Officer/Yer Honour/whoever...!":}:E At which point the HDR 4K footage from the drone is played to the court..... |
Originally Posted by no_one
(Post 10343918)
At which point the HDR 4K footage from the drone is played to the court..... Good time to stay out of the sky today guys, lots of drones no doubt given for Xmas pressies...…...of course all new owners know the laws....cough cough cough Merry Xmas to all who believe, to those that don't then it's just another day in Prooon world:-) |
At which point the HDR 4K footage from the drone is played to the court..... I get your point no-one but there are ways and means....:D And a Merry Christmas to you and all fellow Ppruners!:ok: |
Good time to stay out of the sky today guys, lots of drones no doubt given for Xmas pressies...…...of course all new owners know the laws....cough cough cough |
Folks,
An almost insurmountable problem is the very large number of "drones" that arrive mail order from China or elsewhere ---- what percentage of total sales, I do not know, but in numbers it is in the tens, probably hundreds of thousands for quite advanced RPV --- how do I know --- because I was once associated with a company in China, one of who's divisions did huge mail order /E-Bay/Amazon/AliBaba business with Australia, and he was one of many. Getting the message across about rules and restrictions to most of his customers would be a thankless task. Tootle pip!! |
Honest yer Honour, I thought it was just another mosquito! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:38. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.