PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   RV10 VH-BUY Stolen from Bacchus Marsh (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/612866-rv10-vh-buy-stolen-bacchus-marsh.html)

holdingagain 6th Sep 2018 10:59

There was a dead Chieftain at Cairns 18 months ago, looked like IOD

PDR1 6th Sep 2018 11:52

Maybe he was incorporating the AD about emergency flux capacitator fuctionals after that accident in america a few days ago...

Personally I'm of the view that the correct place for metaphorical smelly clothing is the metaphorical laundry. All this thread is doing is showing the downside of shared ownership schemes where one or more of the sharers starts behaving like a prat.

PDR

The name is Porter 6th Sep 2018 14:05


From the sounds of it - oiling the canopy hinges, putting nitrogen in the tyres, topping up thje ashtrays or similar. Just something that one of the "owners" could use to deny the other "owner" any use of their toy by declaring it "undergoing maintenance".
yep, that's it, that's what I was doing.

The name is Porter 6th Sep 2018 14:06


Personally I'm of the view that the correct place for metaphorical smelly clothing is the metaphorical laundry. All this thread is doing is showing the downside of shared ownership schemes where one or more of the sharers starts behaving like a prat.
Why add to the thread then?

The name is Porter 6th Sep 2018 14:08


In case you missed my question, and I'm still curious, what EXACTLY was the unfinished maintenance?
I'll forward you the report that's been sent to the Federal Police if you like?

Aussie Bob 6th Sep 2018 22:27


I'll forward you the report that's been sent to the Federal Police if you like?
Why don't you just tell us briefly?

What is sad about this thread is that it is obvious a partnership has gone sour. Both parties no doubt feel very wronged. I note there is only one party on this thread and am sure the other has some very valid points. I am suggesting you both sit down in guided mediation and work it out correctly. It would be interesting to hear "the other side" and why such a drastic measure was undertaken.

As far as the MR and the non use of ADSB go, IMHO they are both non events that will result in zero in a court.

haydnc 7th Sep 2018 02:00

EAA's Video archive has a good webinar on aircraft partnerships:

KEEPING THE PEACE IN PARTNERSHIPS- A GUIDE TO AIRCRAFT CO-OWNERSHIP

I found it interesting.

Clare Prop 7th Sep 2018 04:13

I remember years ago in a place far, far away a meeting of a syndicate who owned a lovely aeroplane ending when ambulances had to be called to deal with some broken glass related injuries.
A partnership is a ship designed to sink.

Central Skies 7th Sep 2018 07:38


Originally Posted by Clare Prop (Post 10243227)
I remember years ago in a place far, far away a meeting of a syndicate who owned a lovely aeroplane ending when ambulances had to be called to deal with some broken glass related injuries.
A partnership is a ship designed to sink.

Sadly this one was always doomed to fail.

Real shame - looks like a lovely aeroplane.

LeadSled 7th Sep 2018 08:10

Folks,
As a general observation, based on years on the scene, but group ownership of whatever form and legal structure, seem to work quite well in New Zealand, but all too often end in tears, with much financial loss, in Australia.
This is just another for the records.
Tootle pip!!

TBM-Legend 7th Sep 2018 23:33

Personal issues aired in a public forum! Please explain the purpose of this rant as it is possibly a civil/criminal matter..

Central Skies 12th Sep 2018 04:51

The plot thickens....

Looks like VH-BUY (the company) is no longer the owner of VH-BUY (the aircraft)

Alas TNIP....your ship may have sailed

megan 12th Sep 2018 22:52

FLYTECH SOLUTIONS PTY LTD 5 Kyle Way BACCHUS MARSH VIC 3340 Australia
Well, he now knows which door to knock on.

Lead Balloon 12th Sep 2018 22:56

From CASA’s aircraft register FAQs:

An entry in the Australian Civil Aircraft Register or a certificate of registration for an aircraft must not be viewed as conclusive evidence of the existence of a legal or beneficial property interest in the aircraft. This is clearly stated on the certificate of registration and in CASR 47.055. Financial interests in an aircraft can only be confirmed through whatever legal and commercial mechanisms are available outside of CASA. CASA does not require any proof of ownership with an application to become a registration holder. However, the applicant legally declares that they are the owner of the aircraft.

Parties with a financial interest in an Australian aircraft should ensure that they hold legally accepted documents to prove their entitlement to the aircraft (such as bills of sale, financial contracts, etc).

Bksmithca 12th Sep 2018 23:20


Originally Posted by Capt Quentin McHale (Post 10242534)
TNIP,

I'm curious, what exactly was the unfinished maintenance?

McHale. https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/smile.gif

Capt
If he told us here than the other AME would know what needs to be fixed and it could Fly again

BK

The name is Porter 13th Sep 2018 13:04

12,330 views.

Threats of defamation proceedings.

Tip offs of where the RV10 has been hidden. One could ask if party's were acting with integrity or honesty why has it been hidden?

The bell will toll.

megan 14th Sep 2018 00:39

I see FLYTECH are also the registration holder for VH-SIS, an AMERICAN CHAMPION AIRCRAFT CORP 8KCAB, registered operator DANDY AIRCRAFT PTY LTD PO Box 704 BACCHUS MARSH VIC 3340 Australia.

Aussie Bob 14th Sep 2018 08:56


Tip offs of where the RV10 has been hidden. One could ask if party's were acting with integrity or honesty why has it been hidden?
High time you blokes sorted yourselves out. I would bet my good Bose headset that the party that currently holds possession of the aircraft don't think they have stolen it. Without the "other sides" story I remain totally neutral. You don't convince me Mr. Porter.

AbsoluteFokker 14th Sep 2018 13:08

For the last 10 years aircraft are only worth engine+prop value.

Anything else is a bonus to the seller.

Used to be different but economics now prevail.

Aircraft valuations will continue to be a bone of contention between aircraft shareholders/funders and this is probably such a bone. Many bones to be had this year alone.

Horatio Leafblower 14th Sep 2018 14:28

TNIP I know both parties in this dispute and normally would drink with both of you but this is a bad look.

It's unbecoming of both of you. You and the other party need to deal with it out of the public view.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:36.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.