PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Exactly why would/should you buy or not buy a Brumby? (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/555328-exactly-why-would-should-you-buy-not-buy-brumby.html)

On eyre 25th Jan 2015 23:29

Exactly why would/should you buy or not buy a Brumby?
 
Seems a reasonable question for Australia Day - pros and cons please.
Have a good day all.

Ultralights 25th Jan 2015 23:42

all good, just make sure you pick a decent engine..

Squawk7700 25th Jan 2015 23:44

Australia Day you say?

Aren't they made in China or at least shortly will be?

djpil 26th Jan 2015 00:12

It would be good if the Aircruiser was aerobatic, two up.

ForkTailedDrKiller 26th Jan 2015 01:25

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._NoEffects.jpg

Huh? :E

BPA 26th Jan 2015 02:07

If I had the money I'd buy one.

Lsa 26th Jan 2015 02:48

Crap Service, Lousy Workmanship, Just For A Start.

peterc005 26th Jan 2015 02:57

Brumby Aircraft Australia

Which model are you looking at?

Wonder is they've actually produced an "Aircruiser", the images are computer generated not photos?

Turbine version of the Aircruiser seems optimistic given the turbine CT4 went nowhere.

LeadSled 26th Jan 2015 03:27

Folks,
The Brumby 600 is about the only LSA that has been flight tested (by a highly qualified and certification experienced test pilot) throughout the full flight envelope, to the standards of a Normal Cat. CASR/FAR 23, and then some.

This alone is a major recommendation.

Structurally, they beat most of the competition hands down, that is why their empty weight is a bit up on the competition, but "you can't have one without the other", as the old song goes.

The aircraft could be certified in Primary Cat. (much higher AUW) with the only structural change being some minor increases in sheet metal gauge.

Being of aluminium, any repairs are straight forward, unlike, say, carbon fibre.
You have choice of three engines (counting the different models of Rotax as one), I would probably go for the Rotax, or the new version of the Jab., with all the bugs eliminated ---- true, it exists.

The Lycoming option does not have much history behind it, to tell us what it is going to be like in service, and is heavy.

As for the modernised Aircruiser, forget it, a market does not exist -- just add up the new aircraft of similar performance sold last year,world wide, it is a very small number.

Tootle pip!!

Aussie Bob 26th Jan 2015 04:17


or the new version of the Jab., with all the bugs eliminated ---- true, it exists.
I sincerely hope so Leady, I really do ... It would be a great engine.

But back to the question, because you can go to the factory and talk to an Aussie.

Forky, your showing your age. Didn't those things go out of production a couple of decades ago?

tecman 26th Jan 2015 04:26

It's not quite clear from the website if they currently sell anything that is certified. Anyone know?

It'd be interesting to know how the price of the 600 compares with the Rotax powered Tecnam (all-metal) P2002 which is available in a fully certified version and which has, on paper at least, very similar weights, speeds etc. It's a nice little thing to fly and, if someone could produce a similar aircraft for significantly less cost, it'd be a good recipe.

Certification builds confidence but comes at a big cost to the maufacturer. However, while the volume sales may be in the LSA sector, the success of the certified Tecnams (various models) shows there is a market. Good luck to Brumby for having a go and maybe with the Chinese capital they can crack both the LSA and certified markets.

LeadSled 26th Jan 2015 05:08


if they currently sell anything that is certified.
tecman,
Yes, they are certified in the LSA category.
They meet and exceed the Normal category handling standards, including spin recovery, something few other LSA can boast.
They meet the Primary cat. (Part 23) standards up to a gross weight of about 750 kg, with only a small change of gauge in some sheetmetal.
Given my experience of some of the Tecnam, in my opinion the Brumby 600 is structurally superior, and one of the best handling aircraft around, regardless of certification category.
In my opinion, the Brumby aircraft will survive under Australian operating conditions to a far greater extent than other LSA, and some of the smaller Normal cat. aircraft.
Tootle pip!!

Squawk7700 26th Jan 2015 06:16

LeadSled, aren't they making them in or are going to make them in China soon?

LeadSled 26th Jan 2015 06:45


LeadSled, aren't they making them in or are going to make them in China soon?
Sqawk7700,
There was a good article in a recent edition of Australian Flying about the deal with Avic.
As I read the article, a lots of components will be manufactured in China, and I assume that aircraft for the Chinese market will be assembled in China. However, I think aircraft for the Australian and any export markets will be assembled in AU under the Brumby LSA production approvals.
Tootle pip!!

Aussie Bob 26th Jan 2015 07:03


LeadSled, aren't they making them in or are going to make them in China soon?
Sadly this will be on every Aussie manufacturer's mind. In any event some seriously good stuff comes from China these days.

ozaggie 26th Jan 2015 07:22

Not fair Forkie. I happen to know that On Eyre owned one of those.

On eyre 26th Jan 2015 08:46

That I did Ozaggie. Pity they are not still made.
But back to the airborne version, the big question is will potential buyers die of old age while waiting on delivery ?

Lsa 26th Jan 2015 08:55

Would You Like To Wait 2 Years For One And Then Discover A Myriad Of Faults?

Ultralights 26th Jan 2015 11:25

some of the brumbies delivered over 2 years ago are still going strong in the training environment.. the low wing one with the oleo strut undercarriage had some issues with off tarmac runways, but they no longer make that option..

i would happily own one.

peterc005 26th Jan 2015 12:37

I never knew they Brumby picked up the Aircruiser design. Would be great to see it in production, but I think it's along shot.

Interesting to see in the images that they seem to have redesigned the Airtourer wing tips.

Derfred 26th Jan 2015 14:38

From their own web site:

News - Brumby Aircraft Australia


When the joint venture is fully implemented, airframes will be manufactured in China to Brumby specifications and under Brumby’s quality control. The completed airframes will then be sent to the Brumby factory in Cowra, NSW at which time the engine, instruments, radios and any special paint options will be added before the aircraft is finally flight tested, certified by Brumby Australia and released to the customer.

On eyre 26th Jan 2015 18:29

All the spin in the world will not help if you cannot deliver in a reasonable time frame what is no doubt a good product.

tipsy2 26th Jan 2015 23:06

It must be said that the Brumby AirCruiser shares the name only with the Victa designed and built AirCruiser. Additionally the Brumby named one has nought to do with the CT4 either.

There was only ever one AirCruiser built by Victa that eventually went to NZ and from that the CT4 morphed.

THE AirCruiser is again Australian owned and domiciled.

Tipsy

Squawk7700 27th Jan 2015 00:17

Tipsy are you referring to their page wording below?


Brumby engineers are currently working on the final design of the new AirCruiser and while only one AirCruiser has been produced to date, the highly successful military air training aircraft known as the CT-4 was derived from the AirCruiser design but up-graded to aerobatic standard. The CT-4 is used by the Royal Australian Air Force, the Royal New Zealand Air Force and the Royal Thai Air Force for ab initio flight training.

I'd be surprised if these figures were achieved, as in, often adding 100hp doesn't always add a stack of knots.


n its basic 210 hp piston configuration, the AirCruiser will have a cruising speed similar to or exceeding speeds of well-respected Cessna and Piper models such as the Piper Archer III and the Cessna 172s.

The 310 hp Continental will deliver cruising speeds and useful load capabilities similar to the highly successful Cirrus SR22 but at a significantly reduced capital cost.

tipsy2 27th Jan 2015 01:04

I was making the point of historical accuracy.

The wording on the website is deceptively ambiguous.

You are totally correct when you say "adding 100hp doesn't always add a stack of knots".

Tipsy

Stanwell 27th Jan 2015 01:38

Does anybody know, then, what relationship (if any) Brumby's projected AirCruiser has to Henry Millicer's Aircruiser design?

tipsy2 27th Jan 2015 02:15

Stanwell, Brumby Aircruiser P/L of Cowra NSW are the Type Certificate Holders of T/C VA520. This is the latest incarnation of the original Victa owned Type Certificate 34-4 from 1967.

As to a relationship with Henry's original design, I think the photo's on the website answer that pretty clearly.

Tipsy:suspect:

peterc005 27th Jan 2015 03:34

If you look at the Aircruiser wing it becomes apparent where the CT4 came from.

Would be wonderful if the Aircruiser was produced.

Stanwell 27th Jan 2015 04:18

Thanks, Tipsy.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:35.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.