so, its more than 12 months now, how are those 912IS's going? good it seams.. ECU and sensor issues sorted. all is good with the world again... amazing what a bit of customer service and feedback achieves...
now, the new 135Hp Rotax in a J230 airframe will be a top seller, indestructible well performing aircraft.. not to mention a decent service ceiling to boot with 100% power available up to 15,000 ft. |
Putting a rotax 915 in a jabiru J230 would be serious over capitalization.....
|
I suspect the installed-weight of any of the Rotax 912-family engines in a Jabiru airframe requires significant compromises in either fuel or crew-weights.
I've heard of Rotax installations in Jabiru airframes. I have actually met someone who claims to have flown one. I have seen a photograph of a J160 purporting to have Rotax 912 installed in it...but I have never actually seen one of these aeroplanes, nor have I seen any review of the performance (or possible lack of it), or the pros and cons of the installation, etc etc etc. Additionally, it is only an option (if it is viable) for home-builders. Putting any Rotax engine into a Jabiru airframe isn't a simple task. Attractive? Yes. Simple? No. |
Originally Posted by criticalmass
(Post 9092055)
I suspect the installed-weight of any of the Rotax 912-family engines in a Jabiru airframe requires significant compromises in either fuel or crew-weights.
I've heard of Rotax installations in Jabiru airframes. I have actually met someone who claims to have flown one. I have seen a photograph of a J160 purporting to have Rotax 912 installed in it...but I have never actually seen one of these aeroplanes, nor have I seen any review of the performance (or possible lack of it), or the pros and cons of the installation, etc etc etc. Additionally, it is only an option (if it is viable) for home-builders. Putting any Rotax engine into a Jabiru airframe isn't a simple task. Attractive? Yes. Simple? No. |
Putting a rotax 915 in a jabiru J230 would be serious over capitalization..... How many old C172's or Cherokees are over capitalised? |
I doubt that the new rotax 915 will be $40k. The 914 is 28k US and the new 915 will be at least $5k more. add shipping, GST and convert to aussie and you will be north of 50k.
Add a prop to deal with the new power, the cost to install it all and you will endup with a very expensive aircraft. A 912s on the other hand makes some sense. |
Originally Posted by no_one
(Post 9092123)
I doubt that the new rotax 915 will be $40k. The 914 is 28k US and the new 915 will be at least $5k more. add shipping, GST and convert to aussie and you will be north of 50k.
Add a prop to deal with the new power, the cost to install it all and you will endup with a very expensive aircraft. A 912s on the other hand makes some sense. http://www.aircraftkits.com.au/jabiru_conversion.html Should be adequate for the J230@600kg however. The 915 and CSU prop are a ridiculous amount of money for any aircraft. They make the Lycomings look cheap as chips. |
I've heard of Rotax installations in Jabiru airframes. I have actually met someone who claims to have flown one. I have seen a photograph of a J160 purporting to have Rotax 912 installed in it...but I have never actually seen one of these aeroplanes, nor have I seen any review of the performance (or possible lack of it), or the pros and cons of the installation, etc etc etc. Additionally, it is only an option (if it is viable) for home-builders. Mind you, this was a single hour lesson 4 years ago so my memories might not be completely unbiased. My memories of it are definitely better than my current experience of J160s (underpowered). |
Two engine failures in one flight, the second one to the ground (airfield)
So, I had an interesting day with a 'new' plane (microlight) - and am trying to figure out what might have happened. Help appreciated. I'll bullet point the bits I think important... Avid Flyer 4, in great condition. Jabiru 2200, in great condition. Flight across Alps, south to north. Average altitude 9000, maximum 12K. 4 hours. Took off as normal, but only after a weird whistling on the comms stopped by removing the aircraft power supply and relying on the 9v battery inside. After 3 hours, engine started running roughly, occasionally. Carb icing suspected but carb heat had no effect. Suspected choked/choking mags (no leaning option on this one) so attempted to lean with fuel tap. Fairly difficult several donkey stops before I found the point on the tap (only 90 degrees between open and closed!) but again, no real change/improvement. Problem increasing so I increased RPM (from 2600 to 3000) and engine ran faster than for a normal cruise but smoothly, EGT etc. all okay. Then, silence. Long let down to valley floor (doing all the usual things) engine restarted (by itself) at about 500 agl Id have made my field I think Nearest airfield 10 minutes away (long 10 minutes!), engine running smoothly. Made a very tight circuit and once on base reduced power engine cut. Landing made. Tried to start engine immediately, but barely turned over then clicking from starter (typical weak battery noise). Pushed plane to taxiway and apron Closer analysis with a multimeter, battery reading 12.1V and once engine started with external power there was no change to this figure with RPM movement. The aircraft has no electrical system indicators. 30 years flying, and I get two engine failures in one flight! Answers on a postcard? Fly safe, Sam. |
A bit of the 'pucker factor' in that experience, was there, Sam?
Not being a techie, I'm not able to contribute but I'll watch this one with interest. Good to hear it ended without tears. |
I love a good mystery!
"whistling" = AC voltage from failed or partially failed alternator rectifier? little or no battery charging? gradually weakening battery voltage reduces sparks at plugs? After shutdown, battery has enough time for recovery just enough to give you sparks again at 500'? Why not at least an ammeter light? Alternative: failing ignition module? |
Suspected choked/choking mags |
Hi Sam,
A few notes for you... Carb icing suspected but carb heat had no effect. Suspected choked/choking mags (no leaning option on this one) so attempted to lean with fuel tap. Fairly difficult – several donkey stops before I found the point on the tap (only 90 degrees between open and closed!) – but again, no real change/improvement. Problem increasing – so I increased RPM (from 2600 to 3000) and engine ran faster than for a normal cruise but smoothly, EGT etc. all okay. Then, silence. Long let down to valley floor (doing all the usual things) engine restarted (by itself) at about 500’ agl – I’d have made my field I think… Closer analysis with a multimeter, battery reading 12.1V and once engine started with external power there was no change to this figure with RPM movement. The aircraft has no electrical system indicators. 30 years flying, and I get two engine failures in one flight! Consider fitting an AMPS meter or a volts meter as a minimum. There are plenty on EBay, in fact some simply plug into a cigarette lighter socket - can't get much easier than that. If you are regularly going to fly at high altitudes and you already have EGT gauges, I recommend fitting a Hacman mixture controller. It's a needle valve on the dash with a couple of plastic hoses - one is tapped into the carby vent line and the other to the vacuum under the carby. You will then be able to lean your mixture at higher altitudes which will not only keep the EGT's the same as sea level, but also reduce fuel consumption and premature wear (as above). I have one and it works brilliantly. Very easy to fit and if you buy their version perhaps around $200. You could do it yourself by using hose and a dentist style needle valve with tap - all available from Ebay. |
so jabs have mag coils, does this exonerate the battery?
|
The Jabiru engine has dual ignition coils. It does not have traditional magnetos. As the magnets on the flywheel pass the coils, a spark is generated. In theory no battery power is required, however the battery is required (a flat battery is ok) to complete the circuit. As this aircraft is not a Jabiru (only it's engine) a few questions come to mind:- Why cruise at 2,600 RPM when Jabiru recommends 2,850 - 2,950 RPM ? Jabiru does not recommend cruising at 2,600 revs You can run it at higher than 2,950 revs but it will chew fuel. Does the aircraft cruise fast enough to provide adequate cooling? Are cooling tubes installed to direct cool air onto the ignition coils as called out in Jabiru aircraft? If you don't have them the coils can overheat and run intermittently. When you went to 3,000 revs did you return the fuel tap to full flow? If you didn't the fuel flow wouldn't have been enough to keep the engine going. |
First part is correct. Second part is not unless this particular aircraft has a non Jabiru wiring arrangement. On a standard Jabiru the battery can fall out of the plane and the engine will run normally till the fuel runs out. I had discounted the coils breaking down because they generally don't go U/S at the same time. I find with dodgey ones that they start to run rough about 5 minutes after takeoff (and over a certain RPM - around 2,800+ usually) and even though they are redundant, you can still notice things aren't going well when one of them is misbehaving. The issue described smells like the stator but I'm at a loss to know why it would have stopped the engine. Doesn't sound like fuel, but does sound a little like coils, but being redundant... not sure. |
Warning. Thread drift but still relevant.
Over the last 12 months for various reasons there has been dramatic increase in compliance to the Service bulletins/ Letters and maintenance procedures issued by Jabiru This combined with Jabiru engine training workshops has resulted in fewer incidents and has put Jabiru engines well ahead of Rotax for reliability, the standard by which CASA based their aggressive actions. |
does anyone have numbers for the Jab fleet in the last 2 years?
|
Majority of engines with problems were in flight training........all maintained by L2 or LAME
Self maintained others saw very few problems. Older versions even less I heard 7000 engines, 2000 Jab airframes |
Majority of engines with problems were in flight training........all maintained by L2 or LAME Self maintained others saw very few problems. Older versions even less Using a Jab engine daily seems to be good for reliability. Ones that sit in hangers for weeks or months at a time don't seem to last many hours. Outdoor storage with infrequent use is a recipe for early failure. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:06. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.