PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Jetgo (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/500877-jetgo.html)

falconx 19th Nov 2012 23:14

Jetgo
 
anybody no how these guys are going, heard there new aircraft arrive in Darwin last week................

Barry Mundy 23rd Nov 2012 03:40

No replies..

Must be busy working and making money.

hiwaytohell 23rd Nov 2012 06:12

From what I have seen a very professional operation

skurgler 23rd Nov 2012 19:17

Centre and All Stations in the xyz area this s JTG a VFR Regional Jet etc

Is not consistent with

'From what I have seen a very professional operation'

hiwaytohell 23rd Nov 2012 20:19

So what is not professional about VFR in appropriate circumstances??? Don't these guys operate to a number of remote mining strips?

Stacko 23rd Nov 2012 21:17



So what is not professional about VFR in appropriate circumstances??? Don't
these guys operate to a number of remote mining strips?
What IS professional about it?

Can fly into remote mining strips but must remain clear of cloud.... Hmmm.

Please, don't be so naive.

Gunger 24th Nov 2012 10:12

You've obviously got no idea mate. :ugh:

hiwaytohell 24th Nov 2012 11:10

Gunger if your comment was at me I can tell you after 36 years flying all over the world I bloody well DO have half an idea!

Stacko... I have had a little bit to do with these guys recently.. If you have real dirt dish it up.... from what I have seen they are a very professional outfit.

What is your story? Are you an ex employee with some issue????? Do you have have some grudge against JR?

If you have real evidence post it!

Otherwise get off their case... seems like a good operation with a chance of making a go of it!... anyone prepared to put their balls on the line to create jobs is admirable!

compressor stall 24th Nov 2012 14:01

I don't have anything to do with jetgo or their opposition but, if true, I can't think of one sound reason why one would elect fly a regional sized jet VFR on commercial ops.

Knowing mining companies, I'd be surprised if their aviation auditor allowed it.

hiwaytohell 24th Nov 2012 20:28

CS... I think the comment made re VFR was a bit of sh!t stirring...

At the altitudes they are flying they are obviously not VFR!!!

As I said we have had a little bit to do with these guys recently and from first hand experience they seem to run a very good operation.

Cactusjack 25th Nov 2012 08:54


As I said we have had a little bit to do with these guys recently and from first hand experience they seem to run a very good operation.
Oh please spare us. You are actively trying to promote JetGo and that is fine, but as soon as somebody raises a point that may be negative you cut them down. Time to grow up and take the good with the bad. If you don't like it then you should take to conventional methods and advertise JetGo in the correct media forum and pay for it from your pocket rather than seek free plugs on pprune.

Jabawocky 25th Nov 2012 11:58

VFR is a perfectly legitimate flight regime, just as IFR.

OCTA, in VMC, apart from "no reported IFR traffic" and a SAR which is surely being held exactly what is the difference.

For example, repositioning from a mine site to YBMA for fuel, what is the difference?

Clogging up the system?:ugh:

Some of you guys need need to get in the real world just a few times a year.

One mate who flies commercially now but flew fast military jets in Europe and the UK is still pissing his pnts over ths topic........he wonders how on earth he survived all those years. Outback Australia must be a lot more dangerous than sandy war zones and other hostile European destinations :ooh:

compressor stall 25th Nov 2012 12:14

Digression. Nothing to do with Jetgo
 
You answered your question in your second paragraph. No one said it can't be done.

I've spent many years flying VFR and IFR in the outback so am pretty familiar with the real world, if that's what you want call it.

Give me one good reason why you wouldn't fly a turboprop or jet IFR on commercial/awk ops in outback Oz? Even on short positioning flights from the mine to say Isa or Laverton.

Jabawocky 25th Nov 2012 12:27

If I answered it in the second paragraph, then..... Why would I fly it IFR either? :hmm:

Chicken/ Egg?

Makes no difference and more the point, one is no more "professional" than the other.

The inference was doing the odd VFR leg, for goodness knows what reason s a sign of gross unprofessional operations. Now Stallie, you surely know that ain't true?

Is the glass half full or half empty.......some would complain that the glass is a birt grubby. Others might say the glass is too big.

Just sayin.... :ok:

compressor stall 25th Nov 2012 12:38

I never mentioned, nor implied, anything about gross unprofessionalism.

The cold fact is that VFR is less safe than IFR.

If I heard a commercial operating jet operating from a to b OCTA under the VFR I'd think that odd. There could be a perfectly valid reason for it, but I can't think of one that would offset the reduction in safety from a risk management point of view. No one else has replied either with one.

Mining companies mostly have higher requirements than CASA in general for aviation operations. The ones I've dealt with over the years insist on all ops (even OCTA and with two separate independant satellite tracking systems on board) being IFR.
For a reason.

DBTW 25th Nov 2012 19:29

Fact or fiction?
 

The cold fact is that VFR is less safe than IFR.
Sounds like a personal anxiety problem!

...is it still called agoraphobia when a person is scared of even looking at the outside world when nobody else is around?:)

compressor stall 25th Nov 2012 20:10

Cheers. I'll pass that on to my therapist. :D :D

hiwaytohell 26th Nov 2012 11:03


Time to grow up and take the good with the bad. If you don't like it then you should take to conventional methods and advertise JetGo in the correct media forum and pay for it from your pocket rather than seek free plugs on PPRuNe.
Ouch! A prickly cactus!!! No I am not seeking to promote Jetgo in anyway, instead provide a little positive input from my observations.

90% of the time the comments made on PPRuNe about many operators have been reasonably consistent with what I have seen, the good, the bad and the ugly.... but on this thread and a previous thread saw some posts that were very negative against these guys but are very different from what I have seen and heard in the air... so what gives?

Why is there a group set on these guys in particular, but say other FIFO operators like Skytrans & Alliance are a protected species (who btw I also think are mostly professional operators).

If someone raises a negative point fine, but back it up!

I knew JR years ago and from what I see he is a guy having a go, and putting his nads on the line. They are creating more flying jobs in what looks like some good equipment!

I sincerely hope they are a success.

flying-spike 26th Nov 2012 19:25

VFR or Visual, Conspiracy or F@#K UP
 
I would be giving them the benefit of the doubt. As they say: "If faced with either a conspiracy or a a f@#k up I would put my money on the latter" Or words to that effect.
I would suspect they meant to say "visual" and "VFR" came out. By the sounds of it it was a broadcast and rather than expect traffic to translate their positions from visual references to a position relative to a navaid they were letting any potential traffic know that they were aware of their position with reference to the ground.

Barry Mundy 26th Nov 2012 21:46

No I dont work for them but knowing the CP, JR and AM i can vouch for their professionalism. The operation would be professional run, they have a lot on the line give them a go.


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:27.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.