PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   QF Direct Entry / Flight Deck Visit (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/401376-qf-direct-entry-flight-deck-visit.html)

rodrigues 12th Jan 2010 00:06


You would be VERY lucky to get into QF in the next few years with 500hrs
That's exactly what I'd thought. Good point raised by Capt Nomad, if one was to apply at 1000+ hours, surely they would question why you didn't apply at the base prerequisite.

Guess it can be hard to differentiate between what they advertise, and what they really want.

Trent 972 12th Jan 2010 02:15

Rod,
What they do consider is, if your total hours are commensurate with your age. 500 hours command is sufficient if you're aged in your teens but if you're a bit older with minimal hours, you'd have to have a bloody good 'Song and Dance' act to impress the panel.

b_sta 12th Jan 2010 03:49

500 hours command in your teens? Slight exaggeration there I would think!

As for being 'a bit older' with less hours, one would expect that most older pilots with hours on the lesser end of the spectrum would have such out there reasoning as, you know, having been working in a previous career :ugh:

Trent 972 12th Jan 2010 05:19

Thankyou for your correction b_sta. I'll let the 19 year old with 900 hours that I had dinner with recently know that he is a superstar. Bye the bye, I was one of those late starters in QF at just over 30 years of age, but then I had 10,000+ hours by then. I can't think of too many QF drivers who joined with a low hours to age ratio after having a previous career (excepting military pilots). There may be a few but I guess they had a good 'Song and Dance' routine. (They probably didn't fail BAK TWICE either, hey b_sta. Here's one :ugh: just for you.)

b_sta 12th Jan 2010 06:24

Lesson 1: Anecdotal evidence does not constitute a population sample, Trent 972. Perhaps you should have spent a few of those years before you turned 30 getting a tertiary education. :rolleyes:

Trent 972 12th Jan 2010 06:39

OK you win b_sta, your d!ck's bigger than mine.
Pity it's in the middle of your forehead.

.......the spectrum would have such out there reasoning as,......
????????? Try a little of your own advice.
*b_sta: It’s not sarcasm, it’s illiteracy, you knob.
**Now you're calling me "son". I didn't realise it was you mum, sorry.
*** Intelligent discussion -sure, just let me know when you're about to start.

Captain Nomad 12th Jan 2010 06:45


You would be VERY lucky to get into QF in the next few years with 500hrs, contrary to some posters here indicating they know people who have.
If you read my post carefully, I was NOT suggesting that you would necessarily get into QF with 500hrs, only that one should probably APPLY when they meet the minimums.

I personally don't know anyone who DID get into QF with 500hrs but as I said I do know of a couple of pilots who did get in a number of years ago with not a whole lot more than that. One of them was an 'older' applicant who HADN'T put in an application when he first met minimums and was subsequently questioned on that point.

Information to be added to the thought process - that's all I'm offering. I'm more than willing to add emphasis to the point that you would have to be naive to think you will get an airline job with 500hrs as that is extremely rare and entirely dependant on the state of the industry and an individual's suitability and timing.

What recruiters do like to see though, is an application with susequent updates showing how you are advancing yourself even before you get a shot with them.

rodrigues 12th Jan 2010 06:53

Captain Nomad - Gotcha...

I'm turning 23 this year, perhaps be 24/25 by the time I'd apply...

b_sta 12th Jan 2010 07:01


?????????
Try a little of your own advice.
That quote of mine would be sarcasm, you idiot. Clearly most with a late start in accumulation of hours are likely to have been working in non-aviation careers previously, unless you're under the impression that the unemployed of 10+ years magically materialise the cash for flying training out of nowhere.

The point I was getting at is that although you may know some teens with hours in the high hundreds, that's certainly not the norm. And with regards to older age/lower hours acceptance into QF, I was not stating that it's a likely scenario - only that many 'older' pilots would have a very good reason for not having started flying fresh out of grade 10 (though that said, there have been a number of posts on this very forum as of late detailing pilots with late starts in the industry who, despite this, are now driving jets).

Captain Nomad 12th Jan 2010 07:01

You would still be 5+ years younger at application than the 'older' applicant that I mentioned. Definitely not too old to have that as a goal. However, as other posters have pointed out, it can be tough and unfortunately, no matter how good you are, it also depends on a lot of other factors as to whether you 'get lucky' or not.

Have goals but also be realistic and have some other backup plans. You can also spend a very long time on 'hold' files too, so work on other ways to progress your career in the meantime.

Trent 972 12th Jan 2010 07:19

Rod, The average 24/25 year old that started in QF in the last round a couple of years ago, had, around 1,500 to 2,000 hours experience, but as others have said there is no hard and fast rule. It depends on the individual candidate and all their other attributes.
Good Luck

ps.
Go away b_sta, you're an annoying little twerp.

rodrigues 12th Jan 2010 07:37

Appreciate the realistic advice guys, many thanks...

One thing I forgot to put out there is the nature of those hours...Single Instructional time? But I guess at anything below 1000hrs, it'd be unrealistic to expect more than Single time...

b_sta 12th Jan 2010 07:42


b_sta: It’s not sarcasm, it’s illiteracy, you knob.
Well, it certainly is illiteracy on your behalf, I suppose.


ps.
Go away b_sta, you're an annoying little twerp.
Intelligent discussion a little too tough for your feeble mind, son?

Trent 972 12th Jan 2010 08:10

Single time is fine Rod. QF spend a lot of time and money in the sims to give you the skills you'll need.
(There is not a single or light twin out there that will give you the feel for a 747/330/380.)

On second thought
A380 = Cessna 172
747 = Mack truck
A330 = a large bowl of jelly

clear to land 12th Jan 2010 09:04

For b-sta's benefit, by the time I was 20 I had 1600hrs, and was working with 6 guys who had over 2000 by their 20th! (and that was in 1988.)

seavenom 12th Jan 2010 10:07

Movement at QF
 
Two guys that I know have recently been called up by QantasLink for FO gigs. They didn't get the call by not putting in their applications!!! Go for it and good luck.

morno 12th Jan 2010 10:51

b_sta,
I had 1,000hrs when I turned 20, and I'm now 24 with over 3,000hrs. Know quite a few others who are in similar boats.

morno

rodrigues 1st Mar 2010 07:41

Sorry to dig this one up again guys...

Just reviewing the QF Direct Entry criteria (They're not recruiting at the moment, I know, I know) and noticed there's no mention made of ATPL subjects. Is this no longer a pre-requisite?

flyplane83 4th Mar 2010 05:26

do the time
 
My experience is that those that dont do the time and learn to fly planes before they get into an airline as an FO cant think for themselves. They then potentially become very incompetant Captains down the track! Being a very inexperienced FO in an airline is going to give you seniority over someone who went out in GA did the time and came in with a few thousand hours on top of you...

ules 4th Mar 2010 13:03

great thread guys .. enjoying and learning. :ok:


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.