PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Ftdk Jet (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/332870-ftdk-jet.html)

Jabawocky 27th Jun 2008 11:15

FTDK Jet
 
Now we know why Forkie has been in the USA!:}

The roll out of the first one, Picture courtesy of AVweb.....

http://file040b.bebo.com/5/large/200...139271778l.jpg

Howard Hughes 27th Jun 2008 12:15

If only I could afford one...:{

ForkTailedDrKiller 27th Jun 2008 14:39

Geeez Jaba! I wouldn't fly something as ugly as that!

Dr :ooh:

blueloo 27th Jun 2008 23:29

Wonder if it has a parachute for the deep stall..............?

ZEEBEE 28th Jun 2008 01:23


Geeez Jaba! I wouldn't fly something as ugly as that!
I don't think it's ugly at all. And it does have V-Tail :ok:

It would be interesting though to see what effect ground running would have on the tail feathers. prob OK until you're parked with a decent x-wind. :(

LUCKY-1 28th Jun 2008 01:34

Wonder if it has the same yaw tendencies of the other ubiquitous beech forkies? Trap for the new players! (weight of one toe on either pedal i seem to remember works quite well...) :}

ForkTailedDrKiller 28th Jun 2008 02:43


I don't think it's ugly at all
Looks like a toad tadpole!

Dr :8

PS: Ya can see how fuglies get laid!

Peter Fanelli 28th Jun 2008 02:56

That thing is butt fugly!


This is much better :)

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s...7/piperjet.jpg

Green gorilla 28th Jun 2008 03:28

V tails have been around for years in jets works very well but sure looks different.

Chimbu chuckles 28th Jun 2008 05:04

Its ugly...period.

I wouldn't be seen dead in one.

flyinggit 28th Jun 2008 05:32

is that Piper jet a reality? Looks nice. Fuselage looks like a Chieftan too

'V' tail jet looks like a pregnant pasty:bored:

toolowtoofast 28th Jun 2008 06:05

big difference is the FTDK(J) is actually sitting on its own wheels.

Howard Hughes 28th Jun 2008 07:57


is that Piper jet a reality?
Not yet, but not far away...;)

http://www.avweb.com/newspics/piperj...n_01_large.jpg

flyinggit 28th Jun 2008 09:23

WOW that's fantastic! Great pixs tnxs

ZEEBEE 28th Jun 2008 12:02


Looks like a toad tadpole!
Nope, I still reckon it looks good and I'll bet that in the flesh it looks even better.

Where I DO have issues is with single engines on high performance jets.:=

They do still stop occasionally and while a V35 only has one, the difference is in the speed of the forced landing. probably twice what you can bring a V35 or C210 in at.

The difference in Kinetic energy is pretty fearsome.

Peter Fanelli 28th Jun 2008 12:42


They do still stop occasionally and while a V35 only has one, the difference is in the speed of the forced landing. probably twice what you can bring a V35 or C210 in at.
As far as I am aware there are no special rules for jet aircraft.
Here in the USA a single engine aircraft has to have a stalling speed of less than 61 kts. Therefore forced landing speed will not be any different for a single engine jet compared to other high performance singles, piston or turboprop.
Stalling speed can be higher than 61 kts but it requires greater crashworthiness in the cabin thus more weight.
FAR 23.49 is the reference if anyone wants it.


Why is it that people think that when you slap a jet engine on something it automatically loses it's gliding ability?

ZEEBEE 28th Jun 2008 15:55


Why is it that people think that when you slap a jet engine on something it automatically loses it's gliding ability?
Quite the contrary, Peter. The actual gliding ability of most jet powered machines (including airliners) beats the heck out of any of the standard piston machines, not counting the new breed of powered gliders, of course.

I guess it's just that the pursuit of speed imposes some compromises in the low end envelope, since few jet aircraft are marketed as STOL machines.

Also, the Jet machines are required to operate over a much wider flight envelope than the old bangers we've become accustomd to.

Looking at the wing section of the Cirrus jet for example, it just LOOKS like it wouldn't be happy below 80 or 90 knots and the paraphernalia that you can hang on a piston engine machine to allow it to fly slowly exacts a toll at higher speeds of th jet.
Consequently, when the fire goes out, the driver has got less choices insofar as where he/she is going to park the said machine.
On the other hand, I s'pose it's also true that if it goes quiet at FL370 you can probably glide to a serviceable strip, but then the management of the approach phase sans burner is probably going to be the tricky bit.

I'm sure that if you got one of thse new jets on an ILS glide slope it would pretty much stay on it with a bit of judicious airbrake, but a succssful forced landing on field or off may be another matter.

Peter Fanelli 28th Jun 2008 16:11

I recall way back, I think it was my first attempt at SCPL Flight Planning there were a couple of people in the class who were convinced that a jet powered aircraft would not glide and would in fact fall like a brick should the engines all fail.

Bevan666 28th Jun 2008 22:56

This one is more my style

http://www.bja.com.au/ext/DSC_1493.jpg

The Bevan666Jet.

Maggott17 28th Jun 2008 22:58

Does the country from which these students came still have mud huts or are they ex-Mirage jocks?

When the ATAR stopped the pilot threw a brick 'out the window' and flew formation on it to achieve the best glide angle. Ejection mandatory if not at high key (10,000ft AGL) within 1nm of THR though.:O


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.