Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Ftdk Jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jun 2008, 11:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FTDK Jet

Now we know why Forkie has been in the USA!

The roll out of the first one, Picture courtesy of AVweb.....


Last edited by Jabawocky; 28th Jun 2008 at 22:59.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 12:15
  #2 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If only I could afford one...

Last edited by Howard Hughes; 28th Jun 2008 at 00:14. Reason: Because I can't tell the difference between a Cirrus & Eclipse...
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 14:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Geeez Jaba! I wouldn't fly something as ugly as that!

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 23:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wonder if it has a parachute for the deep stall..............?
blueloo is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 01:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Perth
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geeez Jaba! I wouldn't fly something as ugly as that!
I don't think it's ugly at all. And it does have V-Tail

It would be interesting though to see what effect ground running would have on the tail feathers. prob OK until you're parked with a decent x-wind.
ZEEBEE is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 01:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep North
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wonder if it has the same yaw tendencies of the other ubiquitous beech forkies? Trap for the new players! (weight of one toe on either pedal i seem to remember works quite well...)
LUCKY-1 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 02:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't think it's ugly at all
Looks like a toad tadpole!

Dr

PS: Ya can see how fuglies get laid!
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 02:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,233
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
That thing is butt fugly!


This is much better

Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 03:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: west
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V tails have been around for years in jets works very well but sure looks different.
Green gorilla is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 05:04
  #10 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Its ugly...period.

I wouldn't be seen dead in one.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 05:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is that Piper jet a reality? Looks nice. Fuselage looks like a Chieftan too

'V' tail jet looks like a pregnant pasty
flyinggit is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 06:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Godzone
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
big difference is the FTDK(J) is actually sitting on its own wheels.
toolowtoofast is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 07:57
  #13 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
is that Piper jet a reality?
Not yet, but not far away...

Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 09:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOW that's fantastic! Great pixs tnxs
flyinggit is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 12:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Perth
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a toad tadpole!
Nope, I still reckon it looks good and I'll bet that in the flesh it looks even better.

Where I DO have issues is with single engines on high performance jets.

They do still stop occasionally and while a V35 only has one, the difference is in the speed of the forced landing. probably twice what you can bring a V35 or C210 in at.

The difference in Kinetic energy is pretty fearsome.
ZEEBEE is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 12:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,233
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
They do still stop occasionally and while a V35 only has one, the difference is in the speed of the forced landing. probably twice what you can bring a V35 or C210 in at.
As far as I am aware there are no special rules for jet aircraft.
Here in the USA a single engine aircraft has to have a stalling speed of less than 61 kts. Therefore forced landing speed will not be any different for a single engine jet compared to other high performance singles, piston or turboprop.
Stalling speed can be higher than 61 kts but it requires greater crashworthiness in the cabin thus more weight.
FAR 23.49 is the reference if anyone wants it.


Why is it that people think that when you slap a jet engine on something it automatically loses it's gliding ability?

Last edited by Peter Fanelli; 28th Jun 2008 at 16:05.
Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 15:55
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Perth
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is it that people think that when you slap a jet engine on something it automatically loses it's gliding ability?
Quite the contrary, Peter. The actual gliding ability of most jet powered machines (including airliners) beats the heck out of any of the standard piston machines, not counting the new breed of powered gliders, of course.

I guess it's just that the pursuit of speed imposes some compromises in the low end envelope, since few jet aircraft are marketed as STOL machines.

Also, the Jet machines are required to operate over a much wider flight envelope than the old bangers we've become accustomd to.

Looking at the wing section of the Cirrus jet for example, it just LOOKS like it wouldn't be happy below 80 or 90 knots and the paraphernalia that you can hang on a piston engine machine to allow it to fly slowly exacts a toll at higher speeds of th jet.
Consequently, when the fire goes out, the driver has got less choices insofar as where he/she is going to park the said machine.
On the other hand, I s'pose it's also true that if it goes quiet at FL370 you can probably glide to a serviceable strip, but then the management of the approach phase sans burner is probably going to be the tricky bit.

I'm sure that if you got one of thse new jets on an ILS glide slope it would pretty much stay on it with a bit of judicious airbrake, but a succssful forced landing on field or off may be another matter.
ZEEBEE is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 16:11
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,233
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
I recall way back, I think it was my first attempt at SCPL Flight Planning there were a couple of people in the class who were convinced that a jet powered aircraft would not glide and would in fact fall like a brick should the engines all fail.
Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 22:56
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 477
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
This one is more my style



The Bevan666Jet.
Bevan666 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2008, 22:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Capricorn
Age: 57
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does the country from which these students came still have mud huts or are they ex-Mirage jocks?

When the ATAR stopped the pilot threw a brick 'out the window' and flew formation on it to achieve the best glide angle. Ejection mandatory if not at high key (10,000ft AGL) within 1nm of THR though.
Maggott17 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.