PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Still to many Pilots? (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/269705-still-many-pilots.html)

remoak 31st Mar 2007 08:07

Puff


Interesting you also state that the BAe146 isn't much of a jump to the 737/A320. When Ansett was around a lot of pilots struggled and failed command courses and lateral promotions on both of those a/c types and ended up back on the quadrapuff. Most that did make it stated it was a big jump. FMC was a big hurdle for a lot it seemed.
Funny then how the Euro experience is completely different. Interesting that all the UK locos are more than happy to take 146 guys as DEC, and they don't have a lot of training failures. Same goes for Emirates and others.

More to the point, if Ansett were binning people because they didn't get the FMC, then there must have been some other issue going on. You teach the FMC in the classroom, not the sim. Under the Euro system, from memory, you don't even need to use the FMC for a proficiency check. Any airline that had a candidate who possessed good handling skills but was a little slow with the FMC, and canned them om that basis, has a very odd way of looking at training.

podbreak


so what makes you think the operators should have a DEC req?
I didn't say that they should, necessarily, except where there is a clear experience shortfall in the LHS - I was responding to the point about CASA allegedly requiring VB to hire DECS for that reason.


Remoak made the point that the fact they aren't hiring LHSeaters has left a gaping hole of experience.
No, I didn't. I suggested that this COULD happen. Others obviously think it already IS happening (ie VB).


Is multicrew TP experience relevant? It certainly is
Not necessarily. Banging around in a Conquest or a King Air, even multi-crew, doesn't prepare you for the speed and inertia of most jets, never mind the different handling characteristics. Using that logic, lots of 152 time must be a good preparation for a turborop, especially if you take a mate along to handle the radios.

In my time in check and training, the people we chopped the most of were the light twin drivers with an overdose of "look at me, I'm flying big planes" about them...


There is a relative shortage of pilots in Australia
I thought about it for half an hour, and I still have no idea what that means...

Metro man


At 48 years old with a 146 on your licence, even with substantial good experience you are not gods gift to the airlines accept that.
It isn't the only type on my licence, but thanks for the insult.

So in your career, you have gone from command (of a Chieftain?), to F/O of a jet, then you propose to up sticks and move to Qatar, and then to Emirates? That might be your dream career, but it certainly isn't mine.


The longer you leave it, the harder it gets. Do it now while the time is ripe or you will be in your fifties with an obsolete type on your licence and no one will look at you.
Really? I had no idea it worked like that... :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Metro man... yeah, really...:rolleyes:

Wizofoz


I don't feel in the least entitled to go over the head of incumbent FOs if there are enough to cover the positions.
Nor do I, and I have already said so. It is only where there is a clear experience issue in the LHS. My point is that the Euro airlines recognise the problem and deal with it, but the Aus/Kiwi airlines will do anything to avoid hiring a DEC. Unions 1 - Safety 0.

metro752


Upgrading based on merit or some other bullsh1t doesn't fly here in the U.S.

Seniority is how you upgrade, you blow your checks while getting an upgrade and your usually throw out. There's your merit and skills test.
Yeah and let's look at the state of US airlines... most either in, or have recently been, in Chapter 11... heavily unionised by militant unions... pay and conditions that have closed some airlines, and which are now dropping through the floor as everyone realises that they were never viable... etc etc etc.

And you also have wonderful stuff like furloughs... never see that in Europe. Thanks, but you can keep your "real world", it is one of the least progressive airline environments on the planet.

Chimbu


through life's circumstances
I'm just guessing here, but a lot of Aussies use that phrase... you are referring to 89, right? An event that goes a long way to proving my point. And when you say "taken a job as an SFO on widebody", what you really mean is that you have been forced to go and fly in Asia somewhere, probably on of the less glamourous carriers, in order to get a foothold back on the ladder - right?

I'm not saying that is wrong, or bad, or anything, it's the choice you made. Personally, I would rather live in nice, civilised (for the most part) NZ and get to play with my kids, than have to do what you are doing to keep flying. I don't love flying more than my family, and for that reason I haven't gone down that road - although I was within a whisker of accepting a DEC offer on the 767ER with Air Japan (who don't seem to have a problem with the quadrapuff).


LHS of possibly a VERY substantial aeroplane.
Who cares? Once the cockpit door is shut, they are all pretty much the same. I don't want to fly an automated marvel that records my every input and scolds me if I attempt to deviate from the somewhat rigid rules. I don't particularly want to sit there for eight hours watching the thing fly itself. YMMV.

Personally, I have started my own aviation business, with an earning potential many times that of any airline in this part of the world. I do the occasional contract in Euroland to keep my hand in, and I fly small things when I feel like it. It's a better life (for me)... I haven't even bothered applying to any Oz or NZ airlines - for those who think that this is all sour grapes. Too much arse-licking and grovelling required.

I just believe that the processes and practices down here suck. They are parochial and blinkered. Get away from these shores, and things are very different.

YMMV, and that's fine.

Chimbu chuckles 31st Mar 2007 13:05

You couldn't be more wrong.

podbreak 1st Apr 2007 11:50

Remoak this has gone on long enough, I think your mind is made up and your perception of our industry isn't going to change, however;


except where there is a clear experience shortfall in the LHS - I was responding to the point about CASA allegedly requiring VB to hire DECS for that reason
There isn't, the CASA aren't.


I suggested that this COULD happen
Yes, but it hasn't yet. Hence they don't want/need you.


Not necessarily. Banging around in a Conquest or a King Air, even multi-crew, doesn't prepare you for the speed and inertia of most jets
No, thats why they become FOs first, but as you said command qualities can be gained without the 'speed and inertia', or more specifically REGARDLESS OF TYPE.

I was within a whisker of accepting a DEC offer on the 767ER with Air Japan
What about the inertia? Faster and bigger than the 146...


I thought about it for half an hour, and I still have no idea what that means...
Its pretty clear, there are fewer pilots to jobs now then there was before.


It is only where there is a clear experience issue in the LHS. My point is that the Euro airlines recognise the problem and deal with it, but the Aus/Kiwi airlines will do anything to avoid hiring a DEC
For the third time; We are nowhere near where Europe is/was. If you worked with us you'd know that.


I don't want to fly an automated marvel that records my every input and scolds me if I attempt to deviate from the somewhat rigid rules. I don't particularly want to sit there for eight hours watching the thing fly itself.
Now i'm confused, you want to stay in the regionals then, well they ARE hiring, doesn't sound like you want to fly an A320/737.


I haven't even bothered applying to any Oz or NZ airlines
Now I really feel like i've wasted my time, check out your original post. No one hiring captains, shouldn't matter to you then...

This is a pointless thread drift....:ugh:

Metro man 2nd Apr 2007 04:00

I get to live in a nice civilised place over here. I can walk to the beach in 15 minutes, work is only half an hour away. As all the flying is out and back I get to see more of my kids than I did in Australia. If I want I can afford a full time maid and a new car. Overseas holidays twice a year. This is on an F/O salary.

Recently I had the opportunity to move back to Oz flying the same type, I didn't take it. At the moment I take home about the same as a Captain in DJ/J* when I get upgraded in another year or two I get a 50% pay increase.

When I move on there are plenty of possibilities, not just QATAR or EK. I don't really fancy the sandpit just using them as examples.

Being in Asia is not a hardship I put up with just to keep flying or save money.

Actually you are right I did fly a Chieftain for a while and was overqualified for it having an ATPL 4000+ hours and turbine time but it beat being out of work. It also led me into another job which led me into this. I put my head down and got on with it rather than complain about it being beneath me and waiting for something better which might never arrive. It was worth it in the end.;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.