Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

When to call?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Apr 2003, 07:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: aust
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry When to call?

After a number of near misses at entry points to GAAP and controled aerdromes, it frustrates me when people call up when they have not yet reached the reporting point. If you say you are over some place you should be there not a half a mile west or north of it. When is the correct time to call inboud or request a clearance?
toohey is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2003, 08:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Not the beach
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toohey:

I gather you may be eluding to Bankstown, but any GAAP would be the same.

GAAP entry points can be a bottle neck. Our policy (way back when) was to call as we “approached” the entry point, (the tower at the time preferred this). It gave you (and the tower) plenty of time to sight and orientate other traffic. If you call on top of it (over the radio tower at BY for instance) – and everybody does the same, it gives you very little chance to sight traffic and avoid them, I am not surprised that you have had a few near misses. Be sensible and be alert was the message then and would stand today.
"Approached" was usually within a mile or less of the entry point.
Beech Boy is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2003, 08:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 477
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
On a busy day it can also be dictated on when you can get a word in. Usually still within a 1/2 mile of the reporting point though.

What also ps$$es me off is people going outbound over an inbound approach point at the same altitude as inbound traffic.. I saw three aircraft do that when coming back into MB from the avalon scareshow. I have no farking idea what they were thinking.

Bevan..
Bevan666 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2003, 17:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: here
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really do not think near misses in this situation is really a position reporting problem by that I mean look at what happens if multiple pilots are inbound and do give their position report at the correct time and PLACE and all eta are exactly the same what allows you to advoid a collision "your eyes". time for a story inbound one day 4 planes at an entry point within 30 secs of each other all except me calling either early or late the only problem was with ATC clearing people into the circuit in the wrong order. Only took one situationally aware pilot to clarify the situation.
The Spin Doctor is offline  
Old 1st May 2003, 06:05
  #5 (permalink)  
QNIM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Had one of many scares lately just about to call inbound GAAP when another A/C calls inbound same point, looking above and below without altering coarse, advise the tower we are in the same position, the other A/C advises that they are 1 mile to our 6 o'clock as it takes their students that long to get the call out. THANKS. See post What English is required? Q
 
Old 1st May 2003, 17:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: aus
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If calling at an approach point and you are over head you would call at that point. If still 1/2 mile away wouldnt the call be approaching the point. If this word was included in a large number of situations i have been in it would have saved a lot of confusion.
Spin Doc been in a lot of times via approach points when there are 4 or so aircraft at that point at the same time and had no problems to. Its when you have some one that doesnt know whats going on or cant speak english that creates problems.
high talker is offline  
Old 1st May 2003, 18:31
  #7 (permalink)  
QNIM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey H.T thanks I seem to need a little support here, If they can get the call out as you say approaching the point, it would save a fair bit of laundry. Cheers Q
 
Old 2nd May 2003, 08:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Distance & Bearing????

Would it not be easier if you gave distance & bearing to/from the reporting point to allow everyone an easier time.

If a couple of aircraft are close to the same point at the same time a "...half mile north of BY, 1000' ..." and the next was futher back eg. ".... 1 mile north west of BY, 1100' ..." then all concerned (ATC, PIC's ) would have a better situational awareness, allows ATC better flow control etc...

It is easy to teach the student etc to look at the DI to work out what direction they are approaching a point from ( Bottom of the DI is the direction you are approaching from).

Having survived some horrendous flights into and out of Ardmore, NZ when it was the busiest GA airfield in Australiasia this was common practice and appeared to work fine.

S2K
Sqwark2000 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.