Wikiposts
Search

Notices
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Clearance ambiguity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd December 2002 | 01:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Oz
Clearance ambiguity

G'day all,
Got this clearance today (in Australia) and am a little confused. Was passing FL130 on descent and had traffic 10 miles away co-level, which we had sighted. We were descending OCTA and ATC told us to "leave control area on descent, visual".
Does this mean you must remain visual on descent, ie clear of cloud etc, or does it mean you are responsible for your own visual terrain clearance. Why would he give us this clearance?

Look forward to someone clearing this up for me.

Cheers
Cougar is offline  
Old 22nd December 2002 | 13:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane
If you can recall the other details of the conversation it might be a little easier to work out, but on face value the ATCO could have meant for you either to keep the traffic in sight, or to maintain 8km VIZ, 1500m lateral and 1000ft vertical seperation from cloud AND clear of terrain.

Visual when appended to an instruction in CTA is straight-forward, but confusing when OCTA.
2daddies is offline  
Old 22nd December 2002 | 14:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, ACT
"Visual" assigns terrain clearance to the pilot.
Blue Heeler is offline  
Old 22nd December 2002 | 21:22
  #4 (permalink)  

Just Binos
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
From: Mackay, Australia
Unless the lowest safe altitude was above the base of control area the "Visual" comment, which does transfer responsibility for terrain clearance to the pilot, seems superfluous. Sounds a little to me as though the controller was covering his ass re the traffic. Covering of arses is, unfortunately, becoming the first and overriding criterion of air traffic control these days.
Binoculars is offline  
Old 22nd December 2002 | 22:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Oz
Thanks Binos, no the lowest safe was lower than the CTA steps. This was what caused the confusion. I was quite confused as to what the term visual meant in this regard and thought i might be missing something. Thanks for the input. Good to see ATCO's helping us out when needed
Cougar is offline  
Old 24th December 2002 | 00:06
  #6 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Annecy
I'm puzzled as to why you didn't ask the controller. After all, you're required to read back clearances. This implies that you have copied and understood the clearance. How could you have done that if you didn't fully understand it?
Bellthorpe is offline  
Old 24th December 2002 | 18:12
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Very Good question BT!
weasil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.