Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Tesla of the skies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Oct 2023, 11:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: sierra village
Posts: 675
Received 115 Likes on 60 Posts
Tesla of the skies

https://zeroavia.com/in-house-tech/


Dornier drivers must be wetting their pants!


Seriously, this looks like a starter and Twiggy looking like he might be on to something.
lucille is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2023, 19:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not where I want to be
Posts: 521
Received 49 Likes on 32 Posts
I wanted to find out more about "silicon carbide inverters which biodirectionally convert high-voltage DC into three phase AC" (my underlining) but the site failed to produce when I tried to download further information...

IMV pretty much all the tech is mature enough and available for reliable electrically powered aircraft, the only real impediment being the energy source/density. Once that's resolved (and I'm not personally keen on 'fuel cells') things should move apace, but as I see it we're still some distance from that. Certainly don't see biology assisting much with things!

FP.
First_Principal is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2023, 21:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,217
Received 71 Likes on 38 Posts
Stick with the Cessna C209!
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2023, 22:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,304
Received 426 Likes on 213 Posts
At least they refrained from using the 'game changer' cliche. 'Step change' is accurate.
Lead Balloon is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2023, 22:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 866
Received 214 Likes on 118 Posts
If only hydrogen was easy to store and transport and didn't embrittle many metals and had decent energy density by volume. Running a B737 or A320 is fine but what about the A380 sized tanker that goes along with it? Maybe a plane shaped like the Super Guppy? Liquefied, it has 1/4th the energy per unit volume of kerosene. Where the difference might be made up is efficiency at conversion, but liquid hydrogen is a huge jump. There is some advantage in energy per unit mass, as long as the weight of the containment system can be ignored.

Best of luck to them but the same factors have been a limitation for a long time. Hydrogen storage has been the difficult part.
MechEngr is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.