Alternate Aerodrome requirements
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alternate Aerodrome requirements
Hi all,
Just catching up with IFR Charter (Part 135) after the rule changes. Regarding instrument approaches; has the requirement for two in the air or two on the ground (two independent means to conduct an approach) gone with the regulation changes? Beating my head against the wall trying to find the reference, any help would be amazing!
- Cheers
Just catching up with IFR Charter (Part 135) after the rule changes. Regarding instrument approaches; has the requirement for two in the air or two on the ground (two independent means to conduct an approach) gone with the regulation changes? Beating my head against the wall trying to find the reference, any help would be amazing!
- Cheers
Originally Posted by AIP ENR 1.1
11.7.3 Radio Navigation Aids
11.7.3.1 A flight which is planned to be conducted under the IFR on the
last route segment to its destination must provide for a suitable
alternate aerodrome, unless:
a. for Regular Public Transport and Charter operations:
(1) the destination is served by a radio navigation aid for
which an instrument approach procedure has been
prescribed and the aircraft is fitted with two independent
and separate radio navigation systems, each of which is
capable of using the aid; or
(2) the destination is served by two radio navigation aids for
which independent and separate instrument approach
procedures have been prescribed and the aircraft is
fitted with independent and separate radio navigation
systems capable of using these aids;
11.7.3.1 A flight which is planned to be conducted under the IFR on the
last route segment to its destination must provide for a suitable
alternate aerodrome, unless:
a. for Regular Public Transport and Charter operations:
(1) the destination is served by a radio navigation aid for
which an instrument approach procedure has been
prescribed and the aircraft is fitted with two independent
and separate radio navigation systems, each of which is
capable of using the aid; or
(2) the destination is served by two radio navigation aids for
which independent and separate instrument approach
procedures have been prescribed and the aircraft is
fitted with independent and separate radio navigation
systems capable of using these aids;
Well, I've been flying in the UK for the last 20 years, so it was the result of a quick Google. I thought it had 2020 or so on it, and that seemed recent enough.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks ControlLock! That's about where I got up to with my document search. As far as I can tell there is no requirement for an alternate as long as you are equipped with a single means to conduct an approach (down from a minimum two means prior to the reg changes). I've attached ENR 10.7.2.10 which also seems to confirm that you now only need a single means to conduct an approach. Basically a single TSO-C146 GPS and a VOR (for part 135 certification) is all you seem to need these days to operate without an alternate, provided weather is above alternate minima and the other criteria are met. Have I missed something here?
You’re on the right track for a Part 91 operation, but for Part 135 you need to also consider the Part 135 MOS. For your particular question, have a look at Section 11, especially 11.09.
Essentially yes, you still need 2 receivers in the aircraft, but the requirement is actually that you ensure you have redundancy, rather than telling you exactly how to achieve it.
If you are actually working for a Part 135 operator, their exposition may include company procedures will would hopefully cover the legal requirements in a more user-friendly manner.
Essentially yes, you still need 2 receivers in the aircraft, but the requirement is actually that you ensure you have redundancy, rather than telling you exactly how to achieve it.
If you are actually working for a Part 135 operator, their exposition may include company procedures will would hopefully cover the legal requirements in a more user-friendly manner.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: California
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bump with a related question: I remember a requirement for a destination airport to have multiple usable runways in addition to all other requirement to not file an alternate. Is this a Rule? Who's rule and where can I find it?
Found this-
Destination alternate
At least one destination alternate aerodrome must be designated and specified in the both operational and ATS flight plans if a flight under IFR is going to be made unless one of the following applies:
after taking all relevant factors into account, it is reasonably certain that VMC will prevail for the approach and landing
there is more than one independently useable runway is available which can be expected to be useable at the ETA and at least one of those runways has an instrument approach procedure
the aerodrome is isolated, in which case a destination alternate is not required and instead additional fuel must be carried. a Point of No Return (PNR) must be determined and this must not be passed unless an assessment of the prevailing weather, traffic and other operational conditions indicates that a safe landing can be achieved at the ETA.
Here: https://www.skybrary.aero/articles/alternate-aerodrome
Found this-
Destination alternate
At least one destination alternate aerodrome must be designated and specified in the both operational and ATS flight plans if a flight under IFR is going to be made unless one of the following applies:
after taking all relevant factors into account, it is reasonably certain that VMC will prevail for the approach and landing
there is more than one independently useable runway is available which can be expected to be useable at the ETA and at least one of those runways has an instrument approach procedure
the aerodrome is isolated, in which case a destination alternate is not required and instead additional fuel must be carried. a Point of No Return (PNR) must be determined and this must not be passed unless an assessment of the prevailing weather, traffic and other operational conditions indicates that a safe landing can be achieved at the ETA.
Here: https://www.skybrary.aero/articles/alternate-aerodrome
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: California
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like here:
ICAO Annex 6 Part 1 4.3.4.3 based on a post I found on ProPilotWorld. Still would like to figure out if it is a applicable rule or just a guidance and a good idea.
ICAO Annex 6 Part 1 4.3.4.3 based on a post I found on ProPilotWorld. Still would like to figure out if it is a applicable rule or just a guidance and a good idea.
As a basic guide to the new regs - almost nothing about what we can do has changed, but the page count is about 10 x larger, and a few things have changed names.
So it about 10 x harder to find something, or justify an action.
So it about 10 x harder to find something, or justify an action.
part 121 Alternate Requirements have significantly changed to bring them in line with ICAO (roughly).
Last edited by compressor stall; 5th Mar 2023 at 09:11.
Don't forget that suitable alternates usually include the rwy you took off from so, unless you've botched your planning REALLY badly, you should always be able to turn around and go home...
And if you are single engine whats the point of being able to conduct an approach back in after an engine failure?