Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Charter versus government owned aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Charter versus government owned aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2020, 01:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 429
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
A number of posters seem to be overlooking the fact that Mr Corman is a private citizen. He’s no longer a Senator. He’s no longer a politician. He’s a private citizen.

34SQN has a lot better things to do for the benefit of Australia than transporting a jobseeker trying out for a sinecure.
Centrelink requires you attend interviews as part of your "mutual obligation" if you want to keep the Jobseeker allowance. I assume he is just trying to do the right thing.
jonkster is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2020, 06:43
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,887
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by jonkster
Centrelink requires you attend interviews as part of your "mutual obligation" if you want to keep the Jobseeker allowance. I assume he is just trying to do the right thing.
Mathias tweeted the formal job interview was over last week in Europe. He said he had a “few more meetings” and flew to the Azores and on to South America. Then home via Honolulu today.

To those who say the Govt jet would have been doing something and it was positive the crew ticked off a few countries on the log book, well, you’ve missed the point of the thread.


The public should be told the cost of all the extras.

Te secondary point is what is the commercial value of the flights to Mathias? For instance, the army engineers build an extension to your home, the cost to the taxpayer is negligible, but the increase in value to your home is not.


Why didn’t this private citizen spend his own dollars, which could have gone to private charter companies and (non salaried?) civilian pilots?
Nov 7th Canberra-Perth -Muskrat-Anarka-Copenhagen-Berlin-Zurich-Bern-Ljubljana-Bern-Luxembourgh-Brussels-Madrid-Lisbon-Vienna-Budapest-Le Bourget -Geneva-Ponta Delgada (Azores)- Bogata-Santiago -Bogata-Cartagena-Honolulu-Canberra Dec 10

Mjb

mickjoebill is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2020, 07:54
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Peninsula
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bodie ! There was recent article a few W/E Auatralians ago whe Ergas? Kenny ? gave a spiel on exactly this subject and the gist was the OECD in Europe will lead to the life of abject luxury for this now private citizen and that the return on investment to the Oz taxpayer will be ZILCH. Whether he gets the job or not
It really just reinforces the view that bureaurats and pollies just LOVE to spend other peoples money any which way.. Its a life style thing...we're entitled.!
For every article that takes this line, there'd be one that takes the opposite line I reckon.
Bodie1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.