Integrated vs Non Integrated CPL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Queensland
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Integrated vs Non Integrated CPL
Hey all,
Yep, one of these threads again. I did use the search before considering this post but it seems like the last searchable discussions were in 2005. Guys & Girls in the industry, what are your thoughts on pilots coming through the 150hr vs 200hr course? Are they equally employable afterwards? I'm 30 years old, don't particularly want to go to the airlines and already have a degree so don't fancy going back to uni either. My local flight school does the 200 hour course which I'm considering. It's a big commitment for my wife and I but she's on board and we can afford it. We know the first job will probably be somewhere remote and that's fine too.
Jo.
Yep, one of these threads again. I did use the search before considering this post but it seems like the last searchable discussions were in 2005. Guys & Girls in the industry, what are your thoughts on pilots coming through the 150hr vs 200hr course? Are they equally employable afterwards? I'm 30 years old, don't particularly want to go to the airlines and already have a degree so don't fancy going back to uni either. My local flight school does the 200 hour course which I'm considering. It's a big commitment for my wife and I but she's on board and we can afford it. We know the first job will probably be somewhere remote and that's fine too.
Jo.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can’t offer much advice, however I have noticed many advertised jobs require 250 hours minimum, so forget the cost saving of 200 (Part 141 school) vs 150 (Part 142) flying hours.
In my opinion, the benefit of the non-integrated course is you may have more flexibility around the time you wish to fly. I commenced in integrated but think I’m soon going to switch to non-integrated. The quality of the instruction is far more important to me than paying minimum cost.
Some interesting relevant reading here:
https://aerocircus.com.au/snag-in-sausage-factory/
In my opinion, the benefit of the non-integrated course is you may have more flexibility around the time you wish to fly. I commenced in integrated but think I’m soon going to switch to non-integrated. The quality of the instruction is far more important to me than paying minimum cost.
Some interesting relevant reading here:
https://aerocircus.com.au/snag-in-sausage-factory/
I would say do the 200 hour CPL at a small to medium sized school. The big integrated schools have no real contacts with any GA operators. Most just claim that they can get you into Qlink.
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do the 200h and find somebody to hire an aircraft and negotiate a preferential rate dry or wet but on flight switch. Don't hire the aircraft through the school.
Here with Moorabbin figures assuming you get your PPL around the 75h mark and a C172
Integrated 150h, leaving 75h at VDO rate at $280/h => $21,000. However note that some of those 75h left will be at dual rate which will be around $380/h.
Nonintegrated 200h, leaving 125h at a FS rate of $200/h (wet). That adds up to $25,000. However total flight time includes ground time and ground time is on average total time – 0.2, hence a further saving. Including myself, I know of two other blokes here who did the maths and made the same decision. The flight switch rate that you'll get from private hires will usually be dry and will hover around the $130/h mark. If you commit to hiring over many hours, you'll always have a strong argument to negotiate a bulk discount.
If you're not looking into VET loans and can afford to self fund your training, the nonintegrated is definitely a very interesting option, especially as Stickshift3000 mentioned, it gives you greater flexibility. You will probably not get your CPL for considerably less money but you'll definitely have around 50 additional hours PIC, most cross country, which you would anyway require for your IR. And, indeed, quality of teaching far surpasses any savings considerations you should have.
Here with Moorabbin figures assuming you get your PPL around the 75h mark and a C172
Integrated 150h, leaving 75h at VDO rate at $280/h => $21,000. However note that some of those 75h left will be at dual rate which will be around $380/h.
Nonintegrated 200h, leaving 125h at a FS rate of $200/h (wet). That adds up to $25,000. However total flight time includes ground time and ground time is on average total time – 0.2, hence a further saving. Including myself, I know of two other blokes here who did the maths and made the same decision. The flight switch rate that you'll get from private hires will usually be dry and will hover around the $130/h mark. If you commit to hiring over many hours, you'll always have a strong argument to negotiate a bulk discount.
If you're not looking into VET loans and can afford to self fund your training, the nonintegrated is definitely a very interesting option, especially as Stickshift3000 mentioned, it gives you greater flexibility. You will probably not get your CPL for considerably less money but you'll definitely have around 50 additional hours PIC, most cross country, which you would anyway require for your IR. And, indeed, quality of teaching far surpasses any savings considerations you should have.
Many of my staff instructors are ex-Integrated schools and they tell me that all but the most talented trainees need 180-220 hours to get the CPL anyway. The "savings" in a 150 hour course are illusory.
As Okihara says, you can do plenty of Night, IF, Aeros, Tailwheel and other things in the 160 hours between PPL and a 200-hour CPL.
As Okihara says, you can do plenty of Night, IF, Aeros, Tailwheel and other things in the 160 hours between PPL and a 200-hour CPL.
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Non integrated hours
As others have suggested, non integrated seems to be the way to go for flexibility and cost savings. There are private owners out there willing to rent their more complex machines to the right people. Most are not interested in casual hours but a bulk hire block can usually be negotiated. Feel free to PM for suggestions. 
Integrated courses, by and large, are a shambles... just look at the thread surrounding one of Australia’s “largest” flying schools as a more extreme example of the money-grabbing culture of the sausage factories...
Plus, history shows that the “admin fees” etc to support those courses outweigh the cost of the additional 50 hrs flying. Better to spend the cash on numbers into your logbook / additional training and experience.
i know for a fact a 200 hr CPL (all done in “real” aeroplanes, completed in C210) with SE NVFR can be done for $80,000...
+1 from me for every comment made above.
Plus, history shows that the “admin fees” etc to support those courses outweigh the cost of the additional 50 hrs flying. Better to spend the cash on numbers into your logbook / additional training and experience.
i know for a fact a 200 hr CPL (all done in “real” aeroplanes, completed in C210) with SE NVFR can be done for $80,000...
+1 from me for every comment made above.
Integrated courses, by and large, are a shambles... just look at the thread surrounding one of Australia’s “largest” flying schools as a more extreme example of the money-grabbing culture of the sausage factories...
Plus, history shows that the “admin fees” etc to support those courses outweigh the cost of the additional 50 hrs flying. Better to spend the cash on numbers into your logbook / additional training and experience.
i know for a fact a 200 hr CPL (all done in “real” aeroplanes, completed in C210) with SE NVFR can be done for $80,000...
+1 from me for every comment made above.
Plus, history shows that the “admin fees” etc to support those courses outweigh the cost of the additional 50 hrs flying. Better to spend the cash on numbers into your logbook / additional training and experience.
i know for a fact a 200 hr CPL (all done in “real” aeroplanes, completed in C210) with SE NVFR can be done for $80,000...
+1 from me for every comment made above.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Queensland
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lots of good feed back here, thanks heaps. I think I'll go with my gut and do the 200 hour course, It'll be fun flying around Australia building hours too. There's really only the one place to hire a 172 in my (small) town. Solo rates are $265/hour which doesn't seem unreasonable.
Thanks again!
Jo.
Thanks again!
Jo.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course you could go overseas.
I know a young lady who went to the USA, completed her CPL, Multi IR in around 8 months, all for considerably less than you could in OZ.
She aint coming home anytime soon, got herself a slot with a regional over there and is living the dream. There are alternatives to Australia's screwed up system.
I know a young lady who went to the USA, completed her CPL, Multi IR in around 8 months, all for considerably less than you could in OZ.
She aint coming home anytime soon, got herself a slot with a regional over there and is living the dream. There are alternatives to Australia's screwed up system.
Many ways to skin a cat.
Do your PPL, get the command hours (night and day) to do your ME CIR and then do your CPL, no NVFR
Will be over 200 hours, however, you will learn to fly better early in your career.
Will be over 200 hours, however, you will learn to fly better early in your career.
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course you could go overseas.
I know a young lady who went to the USA, completed her CPL, Multi IR in around 8 months, all for considerably less than you could in OZ.
She aint coming home anytime soon, got herself a slot with a regional over there and is living the dream. There are alternatives to Australia's screwed up system.
I know a young lady who went to the USA, completed her CPL, Multi IR in around 8 months, all for considerably less than you could in OZ.
She aint coming home anytime soon, got herself a slot with a regional over there and is living the dream. There are alternatives to Australia's screwed up system.
South Africa, however things look quite different. I know of this school http://www.mbsf.co.za which quotes CPL + ME IR for R 394,000 or A$ 39,000 at today's exchange rate. And that is no bogus school.
However, that doesn’t detract from my point - and to get back on track and reiterate my point despite the confusion I may have created...
Integrated training, by and large, is a shambles. The concept is fine, in theory, but the execution in industry by the sausage factories is poor. Reducing the minimum flight experience requirement to qualify for CPL by 25% simply because a trainee does their theory in a certain sequence doesn’t really make sense - and doesn’t work when most of the instructors at the sausage factories are really junior pilots themselves, with little or no commercial experience, often simply graduates of the previous course... Nowadays they are being mentored by “senior” instructors who have worked at the school for a year or two - and nowhere else. This doesn’t lend itself to quality “integrated” training - which would / should heavily rely on the context that only experienced and well trained instructors can give. Sorry to be harsh, but that’s the state of the industry now...
Related to this, VET FEE is one of the worst things that ever happened to flight training in this country. Again, the idea is great - helping those who would otherwise struggle to afford flight training - but the sausage factories often use it as a vast money grabbing scam to the detriment of those the scheme is supposed to help. Further, these kinds of operators may go beyond potentially being grubby little opportunists and may soon possibly start hurting people. What did I hear happened yesterday? Bloody lucky not to have ended in tears, in my book...
Plus, with the increasing difficulty and cost to insure GA charter aircraft of all sizes, very few will employ a 150-170 hour CPL graduate of the sausage factory. Certainly, I won’t.
So...
Do a 200 hr CPL. Do it in an aircraft that will set you up for what you will likely fly in industry. Do it with a school that has dedicated instructors who care - and preferably are current in flying commercial operations outside of the circuit / training area... these schools are still out there, and likely still will be long after certain others have gone by the wayside. Perhaps that school might have contacts that will help you get a start (as a pilot, not an instructor) after you finish training.
Last edited by Flying Bear; 13th Dec 2019 at 02:37.
Of course you could go overseas.
I know a young lady who went to the USA, completed her CPL, Multi IR in around 8 months, all for considerably less than you could in OZ.
She aint coming home anytime soon, got herself a slot with a regional over there and is living the dream. There are alternatives to Australia's screwed up system.
I know a young lady who went to the USA, completed her CPL, Multi IR in around 8 months, all for considerably less than you could in OZ.
She aint coming home anytime soon, got herself a slot with a regional over there and is living the dream. There are alternatives to Australia's screwed up system.
I’m assuming something along the lines of F1 or M1 visa to work as an instructor and the E3 with a regional?
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
She's been there three years, have no idea how she built hours, I know she was working as an FO on corporate shuttle for a while.
From our brief chat she said there was plenty of work there though.
From our brief chat she said there was plenty of work there though.
Just dont want the wannabes or fresh CPL's to think that they can just hop over tp the USA and start working or training.
Far to often I hear people say they just "went to Europe" or "USA" to work without letting people know they are a dual citizen or Greencard holder.
Far to often I hear people say they just "went to Europe" or "USA" to work without letting people know they are a dual citizen or Greencard holder.
E3’s are there for guys that meet FAA ATP Mins already, but being in the USA prior to that to build up 1500 hours is a whole different ball game.
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's a waiver to the work restriction on the M1 visa. How far that gets you in terms of loggable hours must be answered by someone else.
Alternatively, if you've got resources, you can also get a B2 visa valid and fly happily for six months in the US.
Alternatively, if you've got resources, you can also get a B2 visa valid and fly happily for six months in the US.
Flying Bear
I must beg to differ on this:
There is nothing "nowadays" about that - it was certainly rife in the Hunter Valley in the late 80s/early 90s. All 4 flying schools between Cessnock and Maitland suffered the same malaise.
100% well said that man.
I must beg to differ on this:
Nowadays they are being mentored by “senior” instructors who have worked at the school for a year or two - and nowhere else.
Do a 200 hr CPL. Do it in an aircraft that will set you up for what you will likely fly in industry. Do it with a school that has dedicated instructors who care - and preferably are current in flying commercial operations outside of the circuit / training area... these schools are still out there, and likely still will be long after certain others have gone by the wayside. Perhaps that school might have contacts that will help you get a start (as a pilot, not an instructor) after you finish training.