Integrated vs Non Integrated CPL
Fleet Manager

Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,445
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
it was certainly rife in the Hunter Valley in the late 80s/early 90s
Sad to hear that. I did my PPL at RNAC in the 60s (Stan Hone, Jack Blackwell, BJ, and their fine colleagues). Certainly not a case of junior newbies having much clout back then.
Sad to hear that. I did my PPL at RNAC in the 60s (Stan Hone, Jack Blackwell, BJ, and their fine colleagues). Certainly not a case of junior newbies having much clout back then.

Joined: Aug 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 847
From: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
(as a pilot, not an instructor)

There is always this suggestion that instructors are too much "by the book", that they have no sense of "commercial reality". This implies that they are too "careful and slow" in normal opertions and don't accept the "requirements of the real word". This I assume meaning: carrying defects without writing them up, flying overweight and ignoring flight & duty limits.
Then elswhere you will find posts about dodgy GA operators, paying nothing and "forcing" pilots to fly overweight, with defects and out of F&D limits....

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 215
Likes: 69
From: In God's Country
In what way are instructors not pilots? 
There is always this suggestion that instructors are too much "by the book", that they have no sense of "commercial reality". This implies that they are too "careful and slow" in normal opertions and don't accept the "requirements of the real word". This I assume meaning: carrying defects without writing them up, flying overweight and ignoring flight & duty limits.
Then elswhere you will find posts about dodgy GA operators, paying nothing and "forcing" pilots to fly overweight, with defects and out of F&D limits....

There is always this suggestion that instructors are too much "by the book", that they have no sense of "commercial reality". This implies that they are too "careful and slow" in normal opertions and don't accept the "requirements of the real word". This I assume meaning: carrying defects without writing them up, flying overweight and ignoring flight & duty limits.
Then elswhere you will find posts about dodgy GA operators, paying nothing and "forcing" pilots to fly overweight, with defects and out of F&D limits....
My point was not to differentiate between pilots and instructors being as you suggest - but to identify that the first job should be as just a pilot. Consolidate and concentrate on your new skill, before trying to teach it.
In the words of my mentor “How can one possibly hope to teach a skill that they have not yet themselves mastered...”
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 481
Likes: 58
From: USA
Checkboard, that’s not at all what I was inferring! I am a proud Flight Instructor and have built my career on developing pilots - and have a diversity of experience in doing so.
My point was not to differentiate between pilots and instructors being as you suggest - but to identify that the first job should be as just a pilot. Consolidate and concentrate on your new skill, before trying to teach it.
In the words of my mentor “How can one possibly hope to teach a skill that they have not yet themselves mastered...”
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara
but the reality shows that the blind leading the blind method does work as evidenced by just about every country pumping out pilots this way.




