Do you need PPL to become an ATC
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you need PPL to become an ATC
So people were telling me, for both Hong Kong and Australia these days to become eligible for an air traffic controller you need to pass all PPL tests/acquire a ppl?
If that's what I have to do to pursue things I won't stop there but just wondering if it's an actually legitimate that you need PPL
If that's what I have to do to pursue things I won't stop there but just wondering if it's an actually legitimate that you need PPL
This forum is for Airline and RPT matters, so it would be best to continue posting in your thread enquiring about ATC recruitment on the GA & Questions forum.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 76
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a retired Air Traffic Controller, who has worked in Australia (18 years) and Hong Kong (27 years), I can confirm that a PPL is not a requirement. Also having been an instructor in both places, I can also confirm that it definitely doesn't hurt to have the knowledge that comes from having a PPL. In addition, Hong Kong is one of the only places in the world that gives you the opportunity to do flying training as part of your ATC course.
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Might weed out some of those that think a 787 can hover for a start. A lesson in aerodynamics required right there.
It wasn’t long ago that ATCOs used to jump seat to get an idea what it was like from the other side on the radio. Pretty easy to demonstrate issues with some of Australian ATC if that were still the case. Sadly it’s not any more and we’re all the poorer for it.
It wasn’t long ago that ATCOs used to jump seat to get an idea what it was like from the other side on the radio. Pretty easy to demonstrate issues with some of Australian ATC if that were still the case. Sadly it’s not any more and we’re all the poorer for it.
Sorry to disappoint, but in years gone by, quite often.
And Qantas mandated it as part of training of new recruits, and encouraged pilots to visit such as the Center in Honolulu, Singapore and (as it was then) the New York IFR Common Room -- to learn about really serious movement rates.
And I remember the days when DCA paid for up to a PPL for ATC recruits who didn't have a PPL, for some reason, in those days, ATC knowing something about practical aircraft operation was regarded as a "good thing".
Tootle pip!!.
And Qantas mandated it as part of training of new recruits, and encouraged pilots to visit such as the Center in Honolulu, Singapore and (as it was then) the New York IFR Common Room -- to learn about really serious movement rates.
And I remember the days when DCA paid for up to a PPL for ATC recruits who didn't have a PPL, for some reason, in those days, ATC knowing something about practical aircraft operation was regarded as a "good thing".
Tootle pip!!.
Maybe the question should be reworded. How many times since lets say, 2001 have you sat, plugged in and monitoring, at an ATC position?
I agree it would be great if someone paid all ATCs to get a PPL. Sadly I can't see that happening. I'd settle just for an AFR
I agree it would be great if someone paid all ATCs to get a PPL. Sadly I can't see that happening. I'd settle just for an AFR
It used to be a license requirement to fly a famil flight in your area of control once every year(could be extended to 2years) IIRC.
This and other jump seat opportunities were scrapped after 9/11.
This and other jump seat opportunities were scrapped after 9/11.
