Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

ATSB investigation for this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jan 2019, 08:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 556
Received 79 Likes on 38 Posts
ATSB investigation for this?

This aircraft appears to have landed with tailwind resulting in overrunning the runway by one metre. No damage to aircraft, no injury. Four months to come up with the report. Is this a waste resources for an organisation that is struggling to get serious reports out on time? I would have thought all that was needed would have been a chat with the chief pilot and a bit of ICUS for the pilot involved.

Runway excursion involving Cessna 207, VH-MIA, East Wallabi Island, WA on 16 September 2018
The aircraft overflew the island and the pilot reported that she observed the windsock was indicating an easterly wind, which was a crosswind for both runways. She decided to join runway 36 on the mid-crosswind leg of the circuit. The pilot reported that she touched down on the runway abeam the taxiway (see Figure 2), which normally gives her enough runway length to stop the aircraft. However, on this occasion, she could not stop the aircraft and overran the runway end by approximately 1 metre (Figure 1). The aircraft was not damaged and there were no injuries to the pilot or passengers.
Cloudee is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 08:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,305
Received 426 Likes on 213 Posts
Female pilot.

The precautionary principle demands that the authorities presume that female pilots aren’t as competent as males, until the females have proved otherwise. It’s about safety.
Lead Balloon is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 09:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
then what about the SR22 aborted downwind takeoff that I observed last year that did result in an overrun and damage? Where is the ATSB report on that?
Sunfish is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 10:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought all that was needed would have been a chat with the chief pilot and a bit of ICUS for the pilot involved.
From the report:

The pilot reported that she touched down on the runway abeam the taxiway which normally gives her enough runway length to stop the aircraft... The pilot reported that the approach and landing appeared normal....The pilot reported that she used the position of the taxiway along the runway as her decision point as to whether she was going to conduct a go-around. As everything felt normal at that stage, she did not conduct a go-around....
The 'taxiway' is halfway down the runway. I would have thought that the operation whose pilot believes a landing half way down a 637m strip is normal, has issues with its training and supervision..

Last edited by oggers; 30th Jan 2019 at 12:15.
oggers is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 13:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 97
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Meanwhile a Chieftain (on crosshire no less) flown by a less than reputable company has a decent propstrike at Hotham and there’s no investigation

Last edited by evilducky; 31st Jan 2019 at 07:47.
evilducky is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 15:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ._..._...
Posts: 312
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
then what about the SR22 aborted downwind takeoff that I observed last year that did result in an overrun and damage? Where is the ATSB report on that?
I'd assume the 207 incident with passengers was a charter and the SR22 was just a leisure flight, so they are going to put more effort in to the charter.
vee1-rotate is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 02:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 73
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by evilducky
Meanwhile a Chieftain (on crosshire no less) flown by a less than reputable company has a decent propstrike at Hotham than reputable operator and there’s no investigation
The issue is ATSB aren’t aware of the incident unless you put a report in. The fact they flew home after said prop strike makes me think one was never submitted.
CAVOK92 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 12:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 97
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by CAVOK92


The issue is ATSB aren’t aware of the incident unless you put a report in. The fact they flew home after said prop strike makes me think one was never submitted.
It was submitted, it appears in the ATSB summaries as reference number 201805469. The incident summary says:

"During the pre-flight inspection, evidence of a propeller strike from a previous flight was detected."

Report went in, but exactly what it detailed and exactly what happened we'll never know.
evilducky is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 17:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oggers
From the report:



The 'taxiway' is halfway down the runway. I would have thought that the operation whose pilot believes a landing half way down a 637m strip is normal, has issues with its training and supervision..
yes that is the disturbing part, one has to wonder about previous training when that is considered 'normal'! Brakes must be cheap! Hate to imagine how many I incidents like this and others occur out there out of sight out of mind that go unreported?
machtuk is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 21:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Machtuk:
Hate to imagine how many I incidents like this and others occur out there out of sight out of mind that go unreported?
...and the poor quality of ATSB reports and the capricious responses of CASA, as evidenced in the Forsyth review, will only increase the unreported numbers. So much for safety.

Two safety lessons from the Sunfish collection that as far as I know were not reported or published as lessons learned:

- Don’t stuff rags or paper in aircraft orifices to temporarily plug them, use bright red approved covers if required.

- Don’t try demonstrating STOL landing techniques by carrying out a touch and go.


Sunfish is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.