Avgas quality concerns ... helicopters
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lost, but often Indonesia
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TEL (the "lead") is added to a gasoline to increase its octane rating or resistance to detonation. It is not added for any other purpose. The TEL doesn't alter the combustion characteristics of the fuel, it's there to prevent detonation from occurring. The actual amount of TEL in the fuel doesn't matter providing the fuel meets the octane quality specified. (lean rating >100 MON, rich rating >130 P.N. in the case of Avgas 100LL). So if higher octane blendstock is used, less TEL is required for the fuel to meet the octane requirements.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 59
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tio540
Megan, CASA did not forbid operation above 40 deg C. The correspondence stated "a pilot must not operate an aircraft outside the limits set out in the AFM".
Read CAO 20.7.4 again.
Read CAO 20.7.4 again.
“ Therefore, unless a declared emergency exists, if ambient conditions exceed the limitations set out in the AFM, including the range for which performance data is provided, the aircraft must be grounded.”
The TEL doesn't alter the combustion characteristics of the fuel, it's there to prevent detonation from occurring.
TEL reduces the probabilities of detonation occurring by altering the combustion characteristics of the fuel.
How else could adding TEL to fuel “prevent detonation from occurring” if, as you state, TEL doesn’t alter the combustion characteristics of the fuel?
eddie:
That is because the regulator claims to have "safety" as their imperative to the point of draconian penalties and capricious enforcement practices.............yet when this obviously safety related event surfaces, they are no where to be found.
Considering that well funded oil companies are involved, rather than relatively poor private citizens, Might one perhaps think that CASA are institutional cowards?
]Major issue with piston engines in our mustering helicopters turns into another diatribe against the regulator.
Considering that well funded oil companies are involved, rather than relatively poor private citizens, Might one perhaps think that CASA are institutional cowards?
Detonation is the spontaneous combustion of the fuel air mixture ahead of the flame front. The remaining part of the mixture in the combustion chamber explodes prematurely due to the cylinder pressure increase, not as intended via the spark plug. That is what gives the "knocking" or "pinking" (the latter usually known as "pinging" if you're in USA).
In the past I explained it to a rugby playing student by likening it to someone in a match trying to jab him away with a fist, rather than pushing him smoothly out of the way with the palm of a hand. The same energy is expended, but the first one hurts and does physical damage. He understood that.
TEL also forms lead salt deposits on the valve seats and mating surface of the valves themselves. This prevents one or both wearing away prematurely by preventing metal to metal contact. I believe this was a lucky side effect of the initial intention to prevent detonation and wasn't fully understood until some years later when older engines became damaged by the use of the newer, supposedly "greener, low lead" fuels.
The above is also why mag drop checks are done - build up of lead salts can foul spark plug contacts. It's also why car engines needed regular "de-coking" in the days of 4 and 5 star fuel, now a thing of the past. In the 1970s I ran a tuned BSA motorbike with a 12.5 to 1 compression ratio. It needed 4 or 5 star fuel. Decoking the valves on that needed a small chisel - the deposits on them were like toughened glass.
In the past I explained it to a rugby playing student by likening it to someone in a match trying to jab him away with a fist, rather than pushing him smoothly out of the way with the palm of a hand. The same energy is expended, but the first one hurts and does physical damage. He understood that.
TEL also forms lead salt deposits on the valve seats and mating surface of the valves themselves. This prevents one or both wearing away prematurely by preventing metal to metal contact. I believe this was a lucky side effect of the initial intention to prevent detonation and wasn't fully understood until some years later when older engines became damaged by the use of the newer, supposedly "greener, low lead" fuels.
The above is also why mag drop checks are done - build up of lead salts can foul spark plug contacts. It's also why car engines needed regular "de-coking" in the days of 4 and 5 star fuel, now a thing of the past. In the 1970s I ran a tuned BSA motorbike with a 12.5 to 1 compression ratio. It needed 4 or 5 star fuel. Decoking the valves on that needed a small chisel - the deposits on them were like toughened glass.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A.E.F.R says:
Really? If the lead salt deposit you're talking about is lead oxybromide how does it deposit on those mating surfaces? Lead oxybromide melts at 703.4*F. The engine exhaust is between 750*F and 1,650*F so it is in liquid form. The exhaust gas exits through the open valve at better than 600 km/h The valve head is heated to close to the exhaust gas temperature. Under those conditions I don't think anything would stick to to mating surfaces.
The most convincing argument for me that it is an old wives tale that lead is a lubricant and /or cushion is the result when natural gas or propane gas is used in internal combustion engines instead of leaded fuel. The engines last just as long if not longer and there is not an atom of lead in either gas.
TEL also forms lead salt deposits on the valve seats and mating surface of the valves themselves. This prevents one or both wearing away prematurely by preventing metal to metal contact.
The most convincing argument for me that it is an old wives tale that lead is a lubricant and /or cushion is the result when natural gas or propane gas is used in internal combustion engines instead of leaded fuel. The engines last just as long if not longer and there is not an atom of lead in either gas.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 59
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rutan around
A.E.F.R says:
Really? If the lead salt deposit you're talking about is lead oxybromide how does it deposit on those mating surfaces? Lead oxybromide melts at 703.4*F. The engine exhaust is between 750*F and 1,650*F so it is in liquid form. The exhaust gas exits through the open valve at better than 600 km/h The valve head is heated to close to the exhaust gas temperature. Under those conditions I don't think anything would stick to to mating surfaces.
The most convincing argument for me that it is an old wives tale that lead is a lubricant and /or cushion is the result when natural gas or propane gas is used in internal combustion engines instead of leaded fuel. The engines last just as long if not longer and there is not an atom of lead in either gas.
Really? If the lead salt deposit you're talking about is lead oxybromide how does it deposit on those mating surfaces? Lead oxybromide melts at 703.4*F. The engine exhaust is between 750*F and 1,650*F so it is in liquid form. The exhaust gas exits through the open valve at better than 600 km/h The valve head is heated to close to the exhaust gas temperature. Under those conditions I don't think anything would stick to to mating surfaces.
The most convincing argument for me that it is an old wives tale that lead is a lubricant and /or cushion is the result when natural gas or propane gas is used in internal combustion engines instead of leaded fuel. The engines last just as long if not longer and there is not an atom of lead in either gas.
It's pretty well documented that there were a lot of problems with rapid valve seat recession when lead was removed from gasoline. You're may right that "lubrication" may not be the best word for what the lead was doing something . How would you describe what the lead was doing to prevent that? Because I think you're going to have a pretty tough battle convincing anyone that valve seat recession wasn't a problem when automobiles were switching to unleaded fuel.
You (and many others) confused correlation for causation.
Removing the lead from the fuel meant that the lead was no longer in the fuel. That caused an increase in the probabilities of detonation in engines that were not designed to run on unleaded fuel. Detonation causes a disruption of the boundary layer inside cylinders that usually helps to insulate them from being exposed to all of the heat generated by the combustion event. That’s why ‘heavy’ detonation causes an increase in CHT (and is what is causing the problem in mustering chopper engines).
I think you’ll find that what actually caused the rapid valve seat recession in car engines when lead was removed from MOGAS was detonation/high CHT.
Removing the lead from the fuel meant that the lead was no longer in the fuel. That caused an increase in the probabilities of detonation in engines that were not designed to run on unleaded fuel. Detonation causes a disruption of the boundary layer inside cylinders that usually helps to insulate them from being exposed to all of the heat generated by the combustion event. That’s why ‘heavy’ detonation causes an increase in CHT (and is what is causing the problem in mustering chopper engines).
I think you’ll find that what actually caused the rapid valve seat recession in car engines when lead was removed from MOGAS was detonation/high CHT.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What Lead Balloon said.
The cylinders and valves are not hurt by natural gas or propane because their octane rating is above 100
The cylinders and valves are not hurt by natural gas or propane because their octane rating is above 100
Last edited by rutan around; 3rd Oct 2018 at 21:43. Reason: Forgot the last line
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: In my Swag
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Connedrod
FYI. It is affecting fixed wing aircraft. Not as bad as the R22 but there is damaged engines, in fact i have one back a manufacture now being debated on why it is damaged.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Adeliade
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
You (and many others) confused correlation for causation.
Removing the lead from the fuel meant that the lead was no longer in the fuel. That caused an increase in the probabilities of detonation in engines that were not designed to run on unleaded fuel. Detonation causes a disruption of the boundary layer inside cylinders that usually helps to insulate them from being exposed to all of the heat generated by the combustion event. That’s why ‘heavy’ detonation causes an increase in CHT (and is what is causing the problem in mustering chopper engines).
I think you’ll find that what actually caused the rapid valve seat recession in car engines when lead was removed from MOGAS was detonation/high CHT.
Removing the lead from the fuel meant that the lead was no longer in the fuel. That caused an increase in the probabilities of detonation in engines that were not designed to run on unleaded fuel. Detonation causes a disruption of the boundary layer inside cylinders that usually helps to insulate them from being exposed to all of the heat generated by the combustion event. That’s why ‘heavy’ detonation causes an increase in CHT (and is what is causing the problem in mustering chopper engines).
I think you’ll find that what actually caused the rapid valve seat recession in car engines when lead was removed from MOGAS was detonation/high CHT.
Damage to car engines valve seats when lead was removed was that most cars up to that period didn’t have hardened valve seats as they were part of the head casting and machines out of the parent material.
To get around this problem hardened valve seats were used in both alloy and cast iron heads. It had nothing to do with high cht as the water cooling system in a car is far more efficient than air cooling.
Stick to your day job !!!!!
The trouble with your day job is that it has been just about the same day, over and over again, and you’re incapable of learning anything new.
You failed to explain what caused the problem that was solved by using hardened valve seats. It couldn’t have been the absence of lead. As has already been explained, ‘unleaded’ propane or natural gas didn’t cause valve recession.
You failed to explain what caused the problem that was solved by using hardened valve seats. It couldn’t have been the absence of lead. As has already been explained, ‘unleaded’ propane or natural gas didn’t cause valve recession.
Something old is new again?
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%202701.html
When leaded fuel was first introduced, associated valve problems using the aluminium bronze inserts then commonly used..
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%201389.html
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%202701.html
When leaded fuel was first introduced, associated valve problems using the aluminium bronze inserts then commonly used..
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%201389.html
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Something old is new again?
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%202701.html
When leaded fuel was first introduced, associated valve problems using the aluminium bronze inserts then commonly used..
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%201389.html
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%202701.html
When leaded fuel was first introduced, associated valve problems using the aluminium bronze inserts then commonly used..
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarch...0-%201389.html
Tootle pip!!
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Adeliade
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie Dean
Hey mate, which engine aircraft combination was that engine out of. Also what operation was the aircraft carrying out?
