Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

VH- vs. RA-Aus and CASA license vs. RPC, can help connect the dots?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

VH- vs. RA-Aus and CASA license vs. RPC, can help connect the dots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Feb 2020, 10:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: singapore
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it possible to achieve PPL on a recreational aircraft (RPC, sling)?... I suspect RPC aircraft will need to be VH registered...? As I saw some school advertise possibility of achieving CPL on a recreational aircraft....!
ppl5505 is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2020, 02:29
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, as long as the aircraft is on the VH register, then you're good to go. For a CPL flight test you'll need a TAS of at least 120 kts though, which is usually beyond what recreational aircraft are capable of.
Okihara is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2020, 19:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara
Yes, as long as the aircraft is on the VH register, then you're good to go. For a CPL flight test you'll need a TAS of at least 120 kts though, which is usually beyond what recreational aircraft are capable of.

... and a CSU?
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2020, 08:03
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara
Yes, as long as the aircraft is on the VH register, then you're good to go. For a CPL flight test you'll need a TAS of at least 120 kts though, which is usually beyond what recreational aircraft are capable of.
Yep and as long as the book says it can crack 120...who gives a damn what it will actually do.
BigPapi is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2020, 11:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To qualify for CPL flight test, you need and aircraft with a cruising speed of 120KTS and a Manually Adjustable Pitch Control (MAPC).
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
Keith Gray is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2020, 22:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith Gray
To qualify for CPL flight test, you need and aircraft with a cruising speed of 120KTS and a Manually Adjustable Pitch Control (MAPC).
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
Errr... no. Not correct sorry. There are plenty that fit that criteria. The fact that they aren’t VH is a different kettle of fish and a different conversation.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2020, 23:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oops... my typo... Archer should read Arrow.

I would look at CASR Part 61, section I (India) for requirement on VH.
Keith Gray is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2020, 01:30
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,316
Received 233 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith Gray
To qualify for CPL flight test, you need and aircraft with a cruising speed of 120KTS and a Manually Adjustable Pitch Control (MAPC).
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
I think you'll find there is no Archer that meets those specifications either
Clare Prop is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2020, 01:36
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Clare Prop
I think you'll find there is no Archer that meets those specifications either
My mistake... I meant to type Arrow
Keith Gray is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2020, 02:00
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Sydney
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith Gray
To qualify for CPL flight test, you need and aircraft with a cruising speed of 120KTS and a Manually Adjustable Pitch Control (MAPC).
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
What you'll find is the schools using RA-Aus aircraft for CPL operate in the following manner

RA-Aus aircraft used to achieve RPC + Nav Endorsement.
RPC+Nav is converted to RPL+Nav and flight review to activate.
Student completes Command building in RA or VH aircraft
VH registered complex (MPPC+120kts) aircraft used for around 30 hours of dual CPL training, and final flight test.
pilotbm is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2020, 13:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't even need MPPC. People do CPL's in DA42's and Cirrus that don't have a blue pitch lever. The DA42's don't even have a mix lever and still valid for CPL tests.
Stretch06 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.